From: Fernando P. <fe...@in...> - 2003-02-24 18:24:46
|
Thank you for the response. I was just asking because the last relese was August 2001. And I have to wonder, did it reach it's goal or vision, or do you feel it still has somewhere to go? Any improvements/enhancements that you would like to see? Also, another person on this list suggested to have a lookat Jisp, http://www.coyotegulch.com/algorithm/jisp/ , as an alternate to JDBM. It looks pretty good, but that looks like a one person show, not a community. Any thoughts on this? On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Alex Boisvert wrote: > > Hi Fernando, > > Consider this a pong for your ping. :) > > To answer your question, there is a small community around JDBM but > we're kind of quiet. The project is alive but it's not the kind of > project which gathers much attention due to its limited scope. > > Let me give a try for your pros/cons: > > Pros > -Simple > -Small > -Fast > -Transactional > > Cons > -Not a DBMS (no query, no SQL, no database schema, no JDBC driver) > -Exclusive access (no reader/writer locks, not client-server) > > Looking at the cons, I would say they are really (intended) limitations > of the design to meet the original goals, which are effectively listed > in the pros. > > My advice to you is to make sure you have clear requirements for your > software project and to see if JDBM fits those requirements. Additional > features can be built on top of JDBM (such as client-server operation) > so you might want to consider that as well. > > cheers, > alex > > Fernando Padilla wrote: > > Hi. My name is Fernando Padilla, and this is a general message for the > > developers of this project. I am working on Xindice ( > > http://xml.apache.org/xindice ), and have been looking into available > > implementations of persistence code, like BTree, which JDBM seems to > > provide nicely. > > > > So this is a general ping, to see if there is a JDBM community. To hear > > first hand from its developers on JDBM's pros and cons. Etc, Etc. > > > > Hope this message finds all of you well. > > > > Fernando > > > |