java-gnome-developer — For people using the bindings to write their own applications

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Question: TreeView & TreeStore and Listeners

[Mark H. <mh...@ca...>]

Have you looked at selection for each function? It will execute a method
for each selected row of a tree.

Iterating over all rows is likely to be quite slow since it uses many
jni calls. The selection for each method does not.

Gtk 2.3 and hence java-gnome 2.5 will have a much nicer api for doing
this - there is a TreeIter[] getSelectedRows() method.

On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:20:28PM +0100, Alex Moreno wrote:
> The last days i've been working with trees.
> 
> I've found a way of getting selected rows. I don't know is this is a
> correct way of doing it. I'd much appreciate corrections o opinions. The
> way which i'm discovering which row is selected is iterating over the
> tree until i foun the row. Then, i make all the desired work:
> 
> TreeIter iter = tree.getModel().getFirstIter();
> Boolean exit = Boolean.False;
> do{     
>   //if the searched row is equals the actual row
>  if (win.tree.getSelection().getSelected(iter)) {
>    System.out.println(tree.getModel().getValue(iter,win.dataBlock));
>    exit = Boolean.TRUE;
> 
>  }
> }while(tree.getModel().moveIterNext(iter) && !exit.booleanValue()))
> 
> where 
> 	DataBlockString dataBlock = new DataBlockString();
>         [....]
> DataBlock data[] = new DataBlock[] { dataBlock, dataBlock2, ...}
> 
> 
> As I said, corrections a comments are wellcome :-).
> 
> I wish it can help you.
> Greetings
> -- 
>   Alex Moreno
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> java-gnome-developer mailing list
> jav...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-developer
> 

-- 
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `'  http://www.tildemh.com 
   `-   mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... 

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Question: TreeView & TreeStore and Listeners

[Luca De R. <pie...@li...>]

Il mar, 2004-02-03 alle 21:20, Alex Moreno ha scritto:
> The last days i've been working with trees.
> 
> I've found a way of getting selected rows. I don't know is this is a
> correct way of doing it. I'd much appreciate corrections o opinions. The
> way which i'm discovering which row is selected is iterating over the
> tree until i foun the row. Then, i make all the desired work:
> 
> TreeIter iter = tree.getModel().getFirstIter();
> Boolean exit = Boolean.False;
> do{     
>   //if the searched row is equals the actual row
>  if (win.tree.getSelection().getSelected(iter)) {
>    System.out.println(tree.getModel().getValue(iter,win.dataBlock));
>    exit = Boolean.TRUE;
> 
>  }
> }while(tree.getModel().moveIterNext(iter) && !exit.booleanValue()))
> 
> where 
> 	DataBlockString dataBlock = new DataBlockString();
>         [....]
> DataBlock data[] = new DataBlock[] { dataBlock, dataBlock2, ...}
> 
> 
> As I said, corrections a comments are wellcome :-).

I would simply use:

if ((event.getType()) == TreeSelectionEvent.Type.CHANGED) {							
	TreeIter anIter = treeStore.getFirstIter();
	while (!(anIter == null && selection.getSelected(anIter))) {
		anIter = treeStore.getNextIter(anIter);  
	}
	if (anIter != null) {								
		rowSelected = Integer.parseInt((treeStore.getPath(anIter)).toString());
	       //System.out.println("row n." + rowSelected + " selected");
	} else
		rowSelected = -1;							
}				

So you can get the selected row simply getting the rowSelected int.

Also note that since the CHANGED event is only a hint, you have to
expect that it's possible that 0 rows are actually selected.
I haven't tried your code, but for the above reason it could launch a
NullPointerException when it reaches the end of the tree rows without
finding a selected one (or when performed on an empty treeview), so you
have to check that anIter != null.

I also have a smart algorithm to remove multiple selected rows from a
treeview. It  is:

public void removeButtonClicked() {
	TreePath path = new TreePath("0");
	//stop at the end of the list
	while (store.getIter(path) != null) { 
		//remove contiguous selected rows
		while (mySelection.getSelected(path))
			store.removeRow(store.getIter(path));
		//step ahead until an unselected row or null is found
	   	while (!mySelection.getSelected(path) && store.getIter(path) != null)  
			path.next();
		}
	}


As you can see there are 3 while cycles in it.
Does anyone have a nicer/faster algorithm ?

-- 
Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...>

[Java-gnome-developer] Question: TreeView & TreeStore and Listeners

[Alex M. <ale...@gl...>]

The last days i've been working with trees.

I've found a way of getting selected rows. I don't know is this is a
correct way of doing it. I'd much appreciate corrections o opinions. The
way which i'm discovering which row is selected is iterating over the
tree until i foun the row. Then, i make all the desired work:

TreeIter iter = tree.getModel().getFirstIter();
Boolean exit = Boolean.False;
do{     
  //if the searched row is equals the actual row
 if (win.tree.getSelection().getSelected(iter)) {
   System.out.println(tree.getModel().getValue(iter,win.dataBlock));
   exit = Boolean.TRUE;

 }
}while(tree.getModel().moveIterNext(iter) && !exit.booleanValue()))

where 
	DataBlockString dataBlock = new DataBlockString();
        [....]
DataBlock data[] = new DataBlock[] { dataBlock, dataBlock2, ...}


As I said, corrections a comments are wellcome :-).

I wish it can help you.
Greetings
-- 
  Alex Moreno

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] how do the makefiles work?

[Mark H. <mh...@ca...>]

On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:29:16PM +0100, Nicolas Mommaerts wrote:
> Ok, I thought ./genMakefile.in was executed somewhere during the build.
> 
> I'm a Java developer, I know *nothing* about Makefiles, autoconfig or
> build's on Linux in general. But I do want to have 0.8.2 working on my
> system that's why I'm making those patches (and learning about it in the
> process), so my patches are probably the most un-elegant solutions you
> can imagine.

I'm sure they'll be useful. We have already made quite a lot of
improvements to the build system in cvs. Jeff has been spending today
making sure the 0.8 branch has all of these and works correctly -
hopefully 0.8.3 will be a big improvement on 0.8.2

-- 
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `'  http://www.tildemh.com 
   `-   mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... 

[Java-gnome-developer] RE: TreeView & TreeStore and Listeners

[Jeff L. <jef...@ho...>]

The getSelected( ) method is not implemented as you would expect.  It maps 
to
the ...is_selected( ) call in C.  There is a forEach( ) mechanism that 
allows you to
iterate over the selected rows in a TreeSelection.  Mark Howard uses it in

http://www.tildemh.com/sw/debbuggtk/index.shtml

I think there should be an isSelected( ) mapped to ...is_selected and a 
getSelected( )
mapped to ...get_selected( ).  I modified TreeSelection to do this, and it 
seemed to work.
I did not try to pass back the model, as ...get_selected( ) does.  There is 
no reverse
mapping from the C GtkTreeModel handle to the Java TreeModel.

Looks like this is a problem elsewhere, too.  For instance, a call to
Container.getChildren( ) returns a list of Widgets.  New, generic Widgets.  
I can't do
much with them because they can not be downcast to their actual types.

Is there a global mapping from handle back to Widget?  Couldn't find one, 
but it
seems like this is the only real answer to wrapping API calls that return 
widgets.
Something like (not complete):

GObject.java...

public GObject(int handle) {
  this.handle = handle;
  revMap.put( new Integer( handle ), this );
}

Container.java...

public Widget[] getChildren() {
    int[] hndls = gtk_container_get_children(handle);
    if (null == hndls)
        return null;
    Widget[] widgets = new Widget[hndls.length];
    for (int i = 0; i < hndls.length; i++) {
        widgets[i] = (Widget)revMap( new Integer( hndls[i] );
    }
    return widgets;
}



- Jeff

_________________________________________________________________
Find high-speed ‘net deals — comparison-shop your local providers here. 
https://broadband.msn.com

[Java-gnome-developer] [ java-gnome-Bugs-860508 ] text label glade exception

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #860508, was opened at 2003-12-15 14:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kuzman
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=860508&group_id=1522

Category: None
Group: defect
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alex Moreno (alexmoreno)
>Assigned to: Jeffrey S. Morgan (kuzman)
Summary: text label glade exception

Initial Comment:
I've tryied to include a gtk image an when i compile
the sources iget this:


(First:2570): GLib-CRITICAL **: file gutils.c: line 574
(g_path_get_dirname): assertion `file_name != NULL' failed

(First:2570): GLib-CRITICAL **: file gstrfuncs.c: line
232 (g_strconcat):
assertion `string1 != NULL' failed

(First:2570): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: file
gdk-pixbuf-io.c: line 729
(gdk_pixbuf_new_from_file): assertion `filename !=
NULL' failed

An unexpected exception has been detected in native
code outside the VM.
Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0x4D47B589
Function=glade_xml_set_value_from_string+0x54D
Library=/usr/lib/libglade-2.0.so.0

Current Java thread:
	at
org.gnu.glade.LibGlade.glade_xml_new_from_buffer(Native
Method)
	at org.gnu.glade.LibGlade.<init>(LibGlade.java:117)
	at org.gnu.glade.LibGlade.<init>(LibGlade.java:88)
	at org.gnu.glade.LibGlade.<init>(LibGlade.java:60)
	at MyFirstGlade.<init>(MyFirstGlade.java:79)
	at MyFirstGlade.main(MyFirstGlade.java:100)

Dynamic libraries:
08048000-0804e000 r-xp 00000000 03:02 201975    
/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/bin/java
0804e000-0804f000 rw-p 00005000 03:02 201975    
/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/bin/java
40000000-40013000 r-xp 00000000 03:02 2878138   
/lib/ld-2.3.2.so
40013000-40014000 rw-p 00012000 03:02 2878138   
/lib/ld-2.3.2.so
[....]

the line which produces the exception is this one:

libglade = new LibGlade(GLADE_FILE,this);

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jeffrey S. Morgan (kuzman)
Date: 2004-02-03 10:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=90843

Do you have the example code that produced this error?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=860508&group_id=1522

[Java-gnome-developer] [ java-gnome-Bugs-889277 ] Should build using only GCJ

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #889277, was opened at 2004-02-02 16:15
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kuzman
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889277&group_id=1522

Category: build
Group: defect
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Assigned to: Jeffrey S. Morgan (kuzman)
Summary: Should build using only GCJ

Initial Comment:
The GCJ package (part of GCC and included on most linux
distros) can compile and execute standard java byte
codes, that is, it includes the ability to compile Java
sources to *.class files and run then. Besides it
includes jar and other standard command-line tools from
Sun Java2 SDK.

So it should be possible to compile java-gnome using
just GCJ, without the need for a Java2 SDK, which is
best suited for free-software operating systems. This
does not imply generating native code which depends on
libgcj. The generated class files could be run on Sun
Java2 SDK or Kaffe.

Actually Red Hat uses GCJ to compile Tomcat, Ant,
PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, Eclipse and other Java-related
apps included on RHEL3


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Howard (howama)
Date: 2004-02-03 03:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=189107

I did try to use autoconf-archive macros for java detection.
Unfortunately they did not set an includes variable for
compiling the c libraries. We really need help from an
autoconf expert.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889277&group_id=1522

[Java-gnome-developer] [ java-gnome-Bugs-889394 ] ability to specify location/name of libgcj.jar at configure

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #889394, was opened at 2004-02-02 18:43
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kuzman
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889394&group_id=1522

Category: build
Group: enhancement request
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nicolas Mommaerts (mr_dfuse)
>Assigned to: Jeffrey S. Morgan (kuzman)
Summary: ability to specify location/name of libgcj.jar at configure

Initial Comment:
Libgcj.jar is not named like this on all distro's, nor
is it always in the locations where configure looks. An
option to specify where to look and how this file is
named for configure would be useful.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889394&group_id=1522

[Java-gnome-developer] [ java-gnome-Bugs-889400 ] db2html is called docbook2html on some distro's

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #889400, was opened at 2004-02-02 18:50
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kuzman
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889400&group_id=1522

Category: build
Group: defect
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nicolas Mommaerts (mr_dfuse)
>Assigned to: Jeffrey S. Morgan (kuzman)
Summary: db2html is called docbook2html on some distro's

Initial Comment:
When generating the doc's, db2html is used, but on some
distro's this file is called docbook2html. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889400&group_id=1522

[Java-gnome-developer] [ java-gnome-Bugs-889519 ] configure should look for db2html

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #889519, was opened at 2004-02-03 01:12
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kuzman
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889519&group_id=1522

Category: build
Group: defect
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Sébastien Moran (sebz)
>Assigned to: Jeffrey S. Morgan (kuzman)
Summary: configure should look for db2html

Initial Comment:
Unpacking java-gnome-0.8.2 and doing :

./configure
make

I obtain 2 compilations' errors.
Then, db2html is not found on my system, why it is not
required by the 'configure' ?

The errors are in the attached file.





----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Howard (howama)
Date: 2004-02-03 08:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=189107

The configure script needs to be updated to find db2html.

From the attached file:
PasswordDialog is a known problem, will be fixed in 0.8.3

gconf problems are also known. I think they're also fixed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889519&group_id=1522

[Java-gnome-developer] [ java-gnome-Bugs-889519 ] configure should look for db2html

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #889519, was opened at 2004-02-03 06:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by howama
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889519&group_id=1522

Category: build
Group: defect
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 7
Submitted By: Sébastien Moran (sebz)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Summary: configure should look for db2html

Initial Comment:
Unpacking java-gnome-0.8.2 and doing :

./configure
make

I obtain 2 compilations' errors.
Then, db2html is not found on my system, why it is not
required by the 'configure' ?

The errors are in the attached file.





----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Howard (howama)
Date: 2004-02-03 13:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=189107

The configure script needs to be updated to find db2html.

From the attached file:
PasswordDialog is a known problem, will be fixed in 0.8.3

gconf problems are also known. I think they're also fixed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889519&group_id=1522

RE: [Java-gnome-developer] pixbuf and glade??

[Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...>]

> On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 19:08, Luca De Rugeriis wrote:
> > Il mar, 2004-02-03 alle 00:40, Ray Auge ha scritto:
> > 
> > > 
> > > This comes directly from the examples provided with JG 0.82,
> > > (tree/TreeExample.java)
> > This was known and it's a weird error. Code similar to it 
> works without
> > any problem. I can't remember if Jeff fixed it in cvs.
> 
> Thanks, but unfortunately I can't move to the CVS-HEAD right now cause
> I'm working on my thesis, plus I'm on Yellod Dog 3.0.1.(so gnome 2.2)
> I'd need to go through the whole Gnome 2.3.x dance, which 
> would probably
> take a good chunk out of my semester, and might leave me without the
> tools I need to finish off my work. ;).

I have written soo much code in the past two months that I
can not remember for sure but I think I did address this
problem.  I will investigate and try to include any fix in
the 0.8.3 release that I am trying to complete this week.

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] how do the makefiles work?

[Mark H. <mh...@ca...>]

Hi,

If you change the Makefile.in.in files, you have to run
./genMakefile.in. These generate Makefile.in files, which are then
turned into makefiles by configure
 
Similarly for configure.in.in -  you need to run ./genconfigure and then
autoconf to get the configure script

Please send us any changes you make - the build scripts could do with a
lot of tlc. If you know about autoconf, please let me know - there are a
few specific things we would like doing to the configure scripts.

-- 
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `'  http://www.tildemh.com 
   `-   mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... 

[Java-gnome-developer] [ java-gnome-Bugs-889277 ] Should build using only GCJ

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #889277, was opened at 2004-02-02 21:15
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by howama
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889277&group_id=1522

Category: build
Group: defect
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Should build using only GCJ

Initial Comment:
The GCJ package (part of GCC and included on most linux
distros) can compile and execute standard java byte
codes, that is, it includes the ability to compile Java
sources to *.class files and run then. Besides it
includes jar and other standard command-line tools from
Sun Java2 SDK.

So it should be possible to compile java-gnome using
just GCJ, without the need for a Java2 SDK, which is
best suited for free-software operating systems. This
does not imply generating native code which depends on
libgcj. The generated class files could be run on Sun
Java2 SDK or Kaffe.

Actually Red Hat uses GCJ to compile Tomcat, Ant,
PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, Eclipse and other Java-related
apps included on RHEL3


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Howard (howama)
Date: 2004-02-03 08:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=189107

I did try to use autoconf-archive macros for java detection.
Unfortunately they did not set an includes variable for
compiling the c libraries. We really need help from an
autoconf expert.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889277&group_id=1522

[Java-gnome-developer] how do the makefiles work?

[Nicolas M. <ni...@be...>]

Hey,
I patched Makefile.in.in to get around the install errors, but that
doesn't seem  to work as the Makefile doesn't seem to take over these 
changes although the header of the file says it is generated by
./genMakeFile.in from Makefile.in.in

If I change something to the Makefile after unpacking and before
./configure, in what file do I have to change it?

[Java-gnome-developer] [ java-gnome-Bugs-889519 ] gnome and gconf module build errors

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #889519, was opened at 2004-02-03 07:12
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889519&group_id=1522

Category: build
Group: defect
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sébastien Moran (sebz)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: gnome and gconf module build errors

Initial Comment:
Unpacking java-gnome-0.8.2 and doing :

./configure
make

I obtain 2 compilations' errors.
Then, db2html is not found on my system, why it is not
required by the 'configure' ?

The errors are in the attached file.





----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889519&group_id=1522

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] pixbuf and glade??

[Ray A. <ra...@do...>]

On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 19:08, Luca De Rugeriis wrote:
> Il mar, 2004-02-03 alle 00:40, Ray Auge ha scritto:
> 
> > 
> > This comes directly from the examples provided with JG 0.82,
> > (tree/TreeExample.java)
> This was known and it's a weird error. Code similar to it works without
> any problem. I can't remember if Jeff fixed it in cvs.

Thanks, but unfortunately I can't move to the CVS-HEAD right now cause
I'm working on my thesis, plus I'm on Yellod Dog 3.0.1.(so gnome 2.2)
I'd need to go through the whole Gnome 2.3.x dance, which would probably
take a good chunk out of my semester, and might leave me without the
tools I need to finish off my work. ;).

I'll do without, it was just for eye-candy anyway.

BTW, I think I might just have that killer app that really makes the
tools noticed. I just can't reveal it 'till around April. It'll still be
pretty raw, but usable.

Wish me luck, (and thanks for the great libs)

Ray Auge

[Java-gnome-developer] Question: TreeView & TreeStore and Listeners

[Ray A. <ra...@do...>]

Hello All,

I've attached a sample TreeListenerTest class to demonstrate a problem
I'm having with the TreeView Object.

The code is pretty self explanatory, but what I'm trying to do is obtain
the value of a selected row in one tree and have it appended to the
second tree.

Thanks for any help,

Ray Auge

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Ant v Makefile

[Nicolas M. <ni...@be...>]

Hmkay just wanted to know for the dependencies of the ebuild of 0.8.2.
0.8.1 still depended on ant and I copied that part without thinking.

On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 00:52, Luca De Rugeriis wrote:
> Il mar, 2004-02-03 alle 00:24, Nicolas Mommaerts ha scritto:
> > 'We were using ant until 0.8.2 (if I'm right).'
> > 
> > Does this mean 0.8.2 was the last release that depends on Ant or the
> > first that doesn't?
> 0.8.2 doesn't need ant (always if I'm right). You could try to download
> 0.8.1 version, but to stay sure there is the 0.8 too.
> You also find a message from Mark Howard about this in the hackers list.
> (when we have changed our cvs to match the gnome-bindings guidelines).

[Java-gnome-developer] [ java-gnome-Bugs-889400 ] db2html is called docbook2html on some distro's

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #889400, was opened at 2004-02-03 00:50
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889400&group_id=1522

Category: build
Group: defect
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nicolas Mommaerts (mr_dfuse)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: db2html is called docbook2html on some distro's

Initial Comment:
When generating the doc's, db2html is used, but on some
distro's this file is called docbook2html. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889400&group_id=1522

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Ant v Makefile

[Luca De R. <pie...@li...>]

Il mar, 2004-02-03 alle 00:24, Nicolas Mommaerts ha scritto:
> 'We were using ant until 0.8.2 (if I'm right).'
> 
> Does this mean 0.8.2 was the last release that depends on Ant or the
> first that doesn't?
0.8.2 doesn't need ant (always if I'm right). You could try to download
0.8.1 version, but to stay sure there is the 0.8 too.
You also find a message from Mark Howard about this in the hackers list.
(when we have changed our cvs to match the gnome-bindings guidelines).

-- 
Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...>

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] No libgcj.jar

[Bob F. <bob...@ea...>]

Just softlink your libgcj-3.3.2.jar to libgcj.jar.  Then set gcj-root
(or whatever it's called) in the java-gnome configure script to /usr. 
It should all work then.

-- Bob

On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 18:40, Luca De Rugeriis wrote:
> Il lun, 2004-02-02 alle 23:06, Andrew|dev ha scritto:
> > I'm wondering how I could not have libgcj.jar?
> > find / -name libgcj.jar returned nothing. I am trying to ./configure the
> > CVS sources, but obviously it fails!
> I' ve got only libgcj-3.3.2.jar not libgcj.jar and it's located in
> /usr/share/java (on fedora).
> Have you got gcj installed? If not install it or try 
> ./configure --without-gcj-compile
> but it will not compile the gcj related libraries (doesn't matter if you
> don't use gcj to compile your apps).

[Java-gnome-developer] [ java-gnome-Bugs-889394 ] ability to specify location/name of libgcj.jar at configure

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #889394, was opened at 2004-02-03 00:43
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889394&group_id=1522

Category: build
Group: enhancement request
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nicolas Mommaerts (mr_dfuse)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: ability to specify location/name of libgcj.jar at configure

Initial Comment:
Libgcj.jar is not named like this on all distro's, nor
is it always in the locations where configure looks. An
option to specify where to look and how this file is
named for configure would be useful.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101522&aid=889394&group_id=1522

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] No libgcj.jar

[Luca De R. <pie...@li...>]

Il lun, 2004-02-02 alle 23:06, Andrew|dev ha scritto:
> I'm wondering how I could not have libgcj.jar?
> find / -name libgcj.jar returned nothing. I am trying to ./configure the
> CVS sources, but obviously it fails!
I' ve got only libgcj-3.3.2.jar not libgcj.jar and it's located in
/usr/share/java (on fedora).
Have you got gcj installed? If not install it or try 
./configure --without-gcj-compile
but it will not compile the gcj related libraries (doesn't matter if you
don't use gcj to compile your apps).

-- 
Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...>

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Ant v Makefile

[Nicolas M. <ni...@be...>]

'We were using ant until 0.8.2 (if I'm right).'

Does this mean 0.8.2 was the last release that depends on Ant or the
first that doesn't?

On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 00:01, Luca De Rugeriis wrote:
> Il dom, 2004-02-01 alle 18:52, ACJT ha scritto:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > No argument, just wondering the reason, thought it might be related to
> > bindings work. I had the thought it would make porting to windows easier.
> We were using ant until 0.8.2 (if I'm right).
> For the windows platform it shouldn't be an issue since however it
> requires a plethora of tools to be installed.
> Maybe you could grab an older java-gnome version and see how the ant
> build was working.