Re: [Iverilog-devel] Xilinx/Vivado vs. SIMBUS

[Stephen W. <st...@ic...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


So isim is derived from ModelSim? I did not realize that. But
ModelSim is fairly complete and I thought it would have supported
VPI. I guess isim/xvlog is a castrated version?

On 06/06/2013 04:27 PM, Jared Casper wrote:
> I just spend a little while playing with Vivado.  The Vivado
> simulator appears very much like isim (and thus ModelSim), but they
> do brand it differently (the executables are "xelab", "xvlog"
> "xsim", etc.). After playing with it for a while, I'm fairly
> confident that, like isim, it does not support VPI.
> 
> Jared
> 
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Stephen Williams
> <st...@ic...> wrote:
> 
> I'm looking at the possibility of trying to integrate Xilinx
> Vivado simulation with simbus so that I can mix Xilinx tools and
> Icarus tools. For this to work, though, I need VPI on the Xilinx
> tools. I can't seem to find any word on whether that is supported.
> I'm pretty sure isim does not have VPI support, but Vivado seems
> to have a different simulator and I have no idea what it supports
> on that front.
> 
> So, anyone have any direct experience here? Thanks,

- -- 
Steve Williams                "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com           But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com         and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com       And lines to code before I sleep."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlGxHEwACgkQrPt1Sc2b3inEUQCfVnc8K1AC3lgLnaOBsQdWxqq6
P0EAnAzgYOORBE1f5Tlcv5yYXiQ1gBSV
=wPgQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----