Re: [Iverilog-devel] timescale warning too dumb?

[Stephen W. <st...@ic...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Cary R. wrote:
> --- On Mon, 2/23/09, Stephen Williams <st...@ic...> wrote:
> 
>> That's a good point, although it may be a little bit
>> tricky to
>> implement. Hmm...
> 
> My thought was some modification of elaborate_delay_expr().
> I believe all delays must be processed there so it is a
> good single point to look for problems. You certainly need
> some static state information and I have only thought about
> this conceptually, so there may be other issues lurking in
> the shadows.

You have to look for all the places where the elaborator does
timescale conversions. Sometimes the expression is non-constant
and different code it invoked to do the scaling, but it may not
be all that hard to find all the spots.


- --
Steve Williams                "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com           But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com         and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com       And lines to code before I sleep."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJowQtrPt1Sc2b3ikRAlcKAKCZ+wiVi3yADWUnUDCLcjSj6fZXmQCg7cvT
WGJ4cdPcR0S7wGBU0OnzNUo=
=pP5/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----