I have done this by creating a new extension. In the xml file i have manipulate the presentation of some classes (see attached file). Ich have copied the sections from original File datamodel.itop-config-mgmt.xml
The result looks fine
But i have a problem with objects like IP Phone - these are objects that belong to a subclass.
I don´t know, how to manipulate the new ci, to show my new fields from FunctionCI.
There is no area\class in the file datamodel.itop-config-mgmt.xml, where the appearance of the ipphone is described.
I think they're defined in another module, but are indeed children of FunctionalCI.
You'll indeed need to add the fields to the presentation -> details of that specific class too.
Hint: I often look at iTopfolder/data/datamodel-production.xml ; which is a compiliation of all XML files defining classes.
Last edit: Jeffrey Bostoen 2021-10-20
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hey,
i have added 5 new fields to the FunctionCI.
I have done this by creating a new extension. In the xml file i have manipulate the presentation of some classes (see attached file). Ich have copied the sections from original File datamodel.itop-config-mgmt.xml
The result looks fine
But i have a problem with objects like IP Phone - these are objects that belong to a subclass.
I don´t know, how to manipulate the new ci, to show my new fields from FunctionCI.
There is no area\class in the file datamodel.itop-config-mgmt.xml, where the appearance of the ipphone is described.
I hope, you understand, what my problem is.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Holger
I think they're defined in another module, but are indeed children of FunctionalCI.
You'll indeed need to add the fields to the presentation -> details of that specific class too.
Hint: I often look at iTopfolder/data/datamodel-production.xml ; which is a compiliation of all XML files defining classes.
Last edit: Jeffrey Bostoen 2021-10-20
Hello Jeffrey,
you are right. I found this solution this morning in an other discussion.
Thanks for your reply!!!
Holger