From: David S. <dp...@dp...> - 2012-02-22 18:34:00
|
Hi, Get yourself some Intel NIC cards... There are a few on ebay for around $10... They will make a big difference.... Dave *************************************************************************** On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Rick Kunath wrote: > Comments inline... > > On 02/22/2012 11:37 AM, David Meed wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Rick Kunath<k9...@ch...> wrote: > >> upgrading my current red/green P3 -500 MHz PCI based 10/100 NIC (2 PCI > >> in cable connectivity speeds to a 100 down/5 up connection. > >> > >> I'm maxing download out now at about 36 megs, so need some additional > >> headroom. I don't need full gigabit speeds to the Internet but I do need > >> to exceed 100 Mbps for some headroom. > > > > I'm curious what tools you are using to test that connection? Is > > there a chance that the other end (or the internet in between) is your > > speed limitation on that download? I understand that many ISPs > > throttle downloads after a short while to spread bandwidth around (ie- > > first couple of megabytes come at wire speed, then the remainder is > > throttled to allow other traffic room to fit in there). > > My ISP has a test server on their internal network. I've been using > that. I had been getting some 80 to 95 meg speeds to the older test > server they had in place. This machine had a 100baseTx port. It was > replaced with a faster machine at another location. I never got anything > better than 36 megs from that machine, or from any Speedtest.com site. I > still don't know why there would have been the speed difference between > the machines. But at least as far as speeds out to the Internet, I was > never seeing more than the 35 megs approximately I was seeing from the > newer internal est server. > > I then jacked a gigE laptop direct into the cable modem and boom, 100 > meg speeds. Back to the IP Cop box and again I'm at 35 to 36 megs. I > can't explain why. > > > Are you able to get higher speeds without IPCop in place? (direct > > connect to a test pc?) > > Yes. Full speeds I expect. 100 megs. > > > I was using a similar box (P3/633 mhz/128MRam) on a 3mbps connection > > and someone thought the ipcop box was slowing us down. Then we got a > > cable connection (at least 30/2) and I've seen burst numbers as high > > as 75 mbps (using speedtest.net) on the exact same box. Sustained test > > results over 50, but a lot depends on the time of day and how busy the > > rest of the internet is. I don't worry much about IPCop being a > > bottleneck now. > > > > > > Are you running any addons besides the vanilla IPCop? > > No. Pure stock IP Cop 2.0.4 and I'm not seeing any swap or low memory or > high CPU utilization on the IP Cop box. > > > I did have another box with DansGuardian (CopPlus) installed that > > would slow down considerably even on that 3mbps connection until we > > added more memory. > > I can't explain why I wouldn't get at least 80 megs or so with the IP > Cop box in place with the one test server, but did with the older one. > > The NIC cards are Linksys LNE100 cards and they are connected at 100 > megs. SHould be a 33 MHz PCI buss as far as I recall on the IP Cop box. > > I'd sure appreciate any thoughts before I go pick up 2 new GigE PCI > cards for the box and still have issues. > > This couldn't be an IP Cop config issue could it? > > TIA, > Rick Kunath > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ > _______________________________________________ > IPCop-user mailing list > IPC...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user > |