From: Andrew M. <Andrew.McGlashan@AffinityVision.com.au> - 2002-11-30 12:23:44
|
IPCop 0.2 Release -2.4 Kernel (with LIDS? Grsecurity?) -IPTables -XMLRPC backend/frontend -Rewrite of almost all code ! -Backup / restore config to/from xml -Firewall rules through webinterface -Wireless networking -Squidguard (with automatic updating??) -Allow connections from green to red interface (if possible) _Replacement for IPAC_ -DHCP to DNS -IPSec Masq (If available by release date!) -Website translation interface / reports Given how lonnnnnnggggg 0.1.2 has been coming......, I guess that 0.2 will be about at least a year or so away, so you might be safe using IPAC for awhile, but it is not a longer term solution. What is the replacement for IPAC that is scheduled? Andrew McGlashan Mobile: 04 2574 1827 Fax: 03 8790 1224 Affinity Vision Australia Pty Ltd ABN 91 099 273 855 www.affinityvision.com.au -- Retail discounts for existing and new consultancy clients! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Heinemans" <ni...@he...> To: "'Barclay McInnes'" <ba...@mo...> Cc: <ipc...@li...> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 9:29 AM Subject: RE: [IPCop-user] Traffic monitoring of specific workstations. > Well, I was thinking... Ipac (which is included in Ipcop) can do the > trick. Check out this page: http://www.daneben.de/ipacfaq.html, I'm sure > it will put a smile on your face ;) I have no experience with this > though, perhaps someone else on the list? > > Gr, Nick > > -----Original Message----- > From: Barclay McInnes [mailto:ba...@mo...] > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 8:39 PM > To: 'Nick Heinemans' > Subject: RE: [IPCop-user] Traffic monitoring of specific workstations. > > > Thanks for the info. You know, MRTG didn't even occur to me, but that's > a great idea! Almost nobody here even knows what SNMP is, so if I put > it on all their machines they wouldn't mess with it... And if they did, > I'd know about it by the missing stats :). > > Thanks > Barclay McInnes > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nick Heinemans [mailto:ni...@he...] > > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 10:56 AM > > To: 'Barclay McInnes'; ipc...@li... > > Subject: RE: [IPCop-user] Traffic monitoring of specific workstations. > > > > > > Hi Barclay, > > > > I'm currently playing around with iptraf (find it on google), > > which can count total traffic per MAC address. That's > > probably what you want. I don't use it on Ipcop (but on Clark > > Connect), so I can't help you to get it running on Ipcop. > > Also, MRTG might be a solution to monitor traffic on your > > workstations, though they must have SNMP enabled. > > > > Regards, Nick > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ipc...@li... > > [mailto:ipc...@li...] On Behalf Of > > Barclay McInnes > > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 7:38 PM > > To: ipc...@li... > > Subject: [IPCop-user] Traffic monitoring of specific workstations. > > > > > > Hi there; > > We have a network that has a fairly large cap on our > > traffic for a flat fee, but above that cap we have some > > fairly hefty charges per gig should we exceed that. Over the > > last couple of months, we've had some stations believing that > > the bandwidth here is an all-you-can-eat buffet, so we > > actually didn't just creep over our limit, we jumped over it > > with rocket boots. A couple grand of charges later (our > > first hint of this was the bill we got the other day which > > was <cough> a little bigger than normal), I laid down the law > > and so far have buy-off from everyone. So far. But you all > > know how it works, all it takes is 5 or 10 people to think > > "Well, everyone else is being quiet, what if I just do a > > little of this" and before you know it we're back up there. > > Our business use of it takes about 60- 70% of our cap > > normally, so it's not like we have a huge safety margin anyway... > > My questions is: Does IPCop have something built-in > > that can do logged statistics based on Green network IPs for > > traffic, other than just the traffic stats on the admin web > > page? Or if not, can someone recommend something I can slap > > in there that will? I can't use a sniffer on the network > > itself to monitor traffic, as my predecessor at this place > > chose to buy unintelligent switches with no management > > capability, so a promiscuous port for traffic monitoring on > > the inside is quite out of the question, sadly.. > > > > Thanks > > Barclay McInnes > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T > > handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en > > _______________________________________________ > > IPCop-user mailing list > > IPC...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/i> pcop-user > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T > handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en > _______________________________________________ > IPCop-user mailing list > IPC...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user > |