Re: [IPCop-user] Is this a bug?

[Marco v. B. <mva...@su...>]

I suspect this is because of the port number being higher than 1024, and
therefore open by default. It might be that you are simply adding an IP
address to something that is already open. Using ports over 1024 for
services is always problematic.

Regards,

Marco.

----- Original Message -----
From: <jo...@b2...>
To: "iPCop User list" <ipc...@li...>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:28 AM
Subject: [IPCop-user] Is this a bug?


> v0.1.1
>
> I presume not...
>
> External service access: I specify an ip address for a port above
> 1024 and it ignores the ip address, ie treats it as ALL. Is this correct
> behaviour?
>
> TIA
>
> John--
>
> Hi there!  This is just a note from me, to you, to tell you, the person
> reading this note, that I can't think up any more famous quotes,
> jokes,
> nor bizarre stories, so you may as well go home.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> IPCop-user mailing list
> IPC...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user
>