|
From: Mian H K. <Has...@hu...> - 2003-12-29 05:03:16
|
Chris: My mistake; my reply below should have been sent to the entire list. Jon: Would you clarify on the IPAudit-Web situation as outlined in my reply below? Regards, Hasan -- May God shower His peace and blessings unto you. ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Green <cm...@do...> Date: Sunday, December 28, 2003 10:51 pm Subject: Re: [Ipaudit-devel] merry christmas and a happy new website > you only replied to me. So I'm leaving the reply intact without > chopping it apart and doing the reply at top format rather than > inline. > > It really bothers me that the website was redesigned ( and we're > splitting hairs over graphics and general statistics on a project that > does not appeal to a majority user... ) when the content isn't > understood. > > Oh well, back into the wordwork. > > Mian H Khalil <Has...@hu...> writes: > > > Chris, > > > You are absolutely correct; IPAudit-Web is in fact one of > > those top-left sidebar sites, which is not congruent with the new > > IPAudit site layout. The reason a top-left sidebar layout works well > > for the IPAudit-Web site is that (a) the header is relatively small, > > unintrusive, and center-aligned, and (b) the left sidebar is > > unintrusive. By unintrusive, I mean specifically, in this case, that > > the font is small and there are no images that draw particular > > attention. > > > > The sidebar is not present on any pages with no child > > links. If the majority would like this changed, please let us > > know. Lina and I discussed adding the sidebar to all pages and > decided> against it because of the feeling of unnecessary clutter > it brought to > > the site. We keep regularity throughout the site by placing the > > sidebar on all pages with no child links. Perhaps you would be more > > satisfied with the 'Related' text changed to something more > indicitave> of child pages? I feel that this may make a positive > difference to the > > site. Suggestions, anyone? > > > > Most internet users today do not have a scroll wheel on their > > mouse, as of 2003 W3C surveys. Chris Meyer, a design expert, notes > > that scrolling should be avoided because of this. Regardless of the > > fact that this statistic is changing rapidly, I feel that the design > > principles applied to the site should be those built on majority > > statistics, rather than speculation statistics. If there are any > parts> of the site that the majority feel should be combined into > one page, > > please let us know. > > > > Because I have not touched the IPAudit-Web package at all, I > > know nothing about what version of IPAudit need be used with it. > I am > > not responsible for any IPAudit-Web development as far as I > > know. Chris: if you know this for certain, please let me know > > immediately (you asked it as a question, so if you're certain just > > drop me a line and I'll fix the site). Otherwise, Jon: would you > > clarify on this? I will make changes to the site as soon as > > clarification is given. > > > > Thanks, > > Hasan > > > > > > May God shower His peace and blessings unto you. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Green <cm...@do...> Date: > > Saturday, December 27, 2003 8:56 pm Subject: Re: [Ipaudit-devel] > merry> christmas and a happy new website > > > >> Mian H Khalil <Has...@hu...> writes: > >> > >> > Neither Lina nor myself felt that we wanted to continue that > >> > trend, which, from a graphic design point of view is not > >> > optimal. So to answer your question, yes it is possible, but I > >> > don't foresee it being done anytime soon. Nevertheless, if we get > >> > numerous complaints on the user-level from this, IE non > >> > developmental staff, then we will reconsider. > >> ipaudit-web is one of those top-left sidebar designs so > clicking on > >> screenshots makes the eye retrain with each click. Please don't > >> take this as a suggestion to redesign ipaudit-web. > >> > >> Since we're getting into human feel, a sidebar where the related > >> pages for one section will link to another page with no related > >> pages provides a faux navigation. > >> > >> Eg: http://ipaudit.sourceforge.net/documentation/index.html has > >> related links to how it works... but the > >> http://ipaudit.sourceforge.net/documentation/howItWorks.html isn't > >> related to the man pages. > >> > >> > By tailoring the content to graphic design standards, rather than > >> > development standards, we aim to provide a site that is more > >> > easily navigated by all, including but not limited to developers. > >> If there were 100s of pages of content, dividing > >> upcompartementalization makes sense. > >> > >> I'm in favor of having something meaningful to not use the scroll > >> functionality for the initial page load to make sense. > >> > >> However, scrolling is a very cheap user operation with mousewheels > >> but clicking with the foward/back button forces the user to > maintain>> lots of navigational state. > >> > >> The more I click a mouse, the more likely my hand pains are to > flare>> up. That's a hard thing to think about when designing a > web site. > >> > >> Biggest Nit: Isn't the right ipaudit for people to be using the one > >> that's shipped as a part of ipaudit-web? Neither the main page or > >> the ipaudit-web page or downloads page indicate thtat ipaudit is > >> part of ipaudit web and you really only need 1. > >> > >> Cheers, Chris -- Chris Green <cm...@do...> "Yeah, but you're taking > >> the universe out of context." > >> > > -- > Chris Green <cm...@do...> > I have no ability to read string handling code in a gaim window > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for > IBM'sFree Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to > sys admin. > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Ipaudit-devel mailing list > Ipa...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipaudit-devel > |