[swig#] Re: SWIG Csharp module

[Peter G. <p_...@ho...>]

Neil,

Sorry my late answer! 

No, just go ahead. I haven't done any changes so far.

Peter
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Neil Cawse" <ne...@ge...>
To: "'Peter Gloor'" <p_...@ho...>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: SWIG Csharp module


> Peter did you make any changes to the source?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Gloor [mailto:p_...@ho...] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:17 AM
> To: James Michael DuPont
> Cc: Neil Cawse; and...@in...
> Subject: Re: SWIG Csharp module
> 
> James,
> 
> Yes, please add me to the project. My user id is pgloor.
> 
> Putting all the changes under GPL is no problem for me.
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Michael DuPont" <mdu...@ya...>
> To: "Neil Cawse" <ne...@ge...>; "'Peter Gloor'"
> <p_...@ho...>;
> <and...@in...>
> Cc: "'James Michael DuPont'" <mdu...@ya...>
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:27 AM
> Subject: RE: SWIG Csharp module
> 
> 
> > Guys,
> > I will host this project on introspector.sf.net untill savannah comes
> > through. Please sign up at sf.net, get a user id, and I will add you
> to
> > the project. We will make a new mailling list as well.
> >
> > Do you have any problem putting all the changes under GPL?
> >
> > mike
> > --- Neil Cawse <ne...@ge...> wrote:
> > > Mike DuPont has submitted a request to http://savannah.nongnu.org/
> to
> > > host the project. We will put the project under CVS so we can all
> > > make
> > > changes and improve it. There have been a couple of changes various
> > > people have made and with a small amount of work we could correct
> > > some
> > > of the remaining issues. I never got as far as doing the call backs,
> > > but
> > > creating a delegate and passing that shouldn't be much problem.
> > > Swig doesn't have a problem supporting callbacks, just that I didn't
> > > do
> > > the conversion.
> > > I think modifying the java version is the right way to go because as
> > > the
> > > swig guys improve their product, it would make it much easier to
> port
> > > their changes if we wanted to. I even left the same java names for
> > > the
> > > variables for this reason.
> > > I spent some time looking at the easiest way of using a c++ library
> > > from
> > > c# and as of now, there is nothing really as good as swig.
> > > The include files are optional - you can include your whole header
> > > file
> > > but then you don't have control of what swig does.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Gloor [mailto:p_...@ho...]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:59 PM
> > > To: and...@in...; nei...@ho...
> > > Subject: SWIG Csharp module
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've found your email address in one ore more mail list archives
> > > after
> > > searching the Internet for SWIG and C#.
> > >
> > > Now, I'm curious whether your still working on a SWIG .NET
> > > (csharp/clr)
> > > module and how you proceed.
> > >
> > > Since I'm in progress of implementing a wrapper class to provide
> > > access
> > > to a
> > > hughe API from C# and other .NET languages I'm highly interested in
> a
> > > SWIG
> > > module that will support this process.
> > >
> > > I already tried Neil's work I found in SwicCLRNeilCawse10dec02.zip
> > > and
> > > Tiger's (Feng Songyan) csharp.cxx.
> > >
> > > I was impressed by the results I've got using Neils implementation.
> > > However
> > > it obviousely still needs some work to be done and one of the
> biggest
> > > obstacle to me is the lack of support for callbacks (maybe I'm doing
> > > something wrong?).
> > >
> > > What do you thing in general:
> > > Is SWIG the right tool to do this?
> > > What about the interface files? Is this really the right approach? I
> > > could
> > > think about a preprocessor that at least prepares them based on some
> > > options.
> > > What about the concept is it o.k.? (I think, yes).
> > > Is it the right approach to build the clr.cxx from java.cxx?
> > > Is it worth spending the time to improve clr.cxx? Or better take it
> > > as
> > > is
> > > and use the time to implement my callbacks manually?
> > >
> > > If it will not take too much of my time I'll be willing to
> > > contribute.
> > > Are
> > > you organized somehow? I didn't yet contact David Beazley so far.
> > >
> > > I hope to hear from you. Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Peter
> > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > > Peter Gloor
> > > Notes Development AG
> > > Gewerbezentrum Strahlholz
> > > CH-9056 Gais / AR
> > > Switzerland
> > > Phone: +41 71 793 30 40
> > > Fax: +41 71 793 35 11
> > > EMail: p....@no...
> > > http://www.notesdev.ch
> > >
> >
> >
> > =====
> > James Michael DuPont
> > http://introspector.sourceforge.net/
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> >
>