From: Philipp B. <fi...@fi...> - 2003-06-23 12:54:17
|
Hi, I am running 3.0.2-stable on an OpenBSD-3.2 system (via ports) with 'actionsfile default' disabled. 500-1000 requests per minute are typically for this system. Within 15-20 minutes privoxy will eat up over 64MB memory (where it get's killed by userlimits right now). Would you say, that this is the 'typical memory requirement' or might there be another memleak? I think so, since it is not actually caching requests and 64meg sounds a bit hefty for that moderate load. The openbsd port replaces several strcpy by strlcpy, but i dont see an issue there. Right now, I am not bored enough to read a whole diff -uNr between stable and current and i've not found the cvs-changelog so far. My other trackdown could be the pthread subsystem of openbsd, which was fixed in some ways since 3.2, but those fixes would rather cure 'real' crashes or total misfunction, then memory consumptions. And I cannot update this machine remotly now and have no 3.3 or -current system around which would get loaded in the way the system is right now. Comments? Questions? If this can be considered a "real bug", I'll open a ticket in the bugtracker system. TIA, -- Philipp Buehler, aka fips | sysfive.com GmbH | BOfH | NUCH | <double-p> #1: Break the clue barrier! #2: Already had buzzword confuseritis ? |