From: <ve...@ar...> - 2010-12-19 18:53:29
|
> The tag_pattern could also be moved into the union, which means > in case of a pcre host pattern we would need three pointers and > two integers less, at the cost of a byte (or integer) for the > pattern type. In case of the traditional host pattern we'd > still need two pointers less. So I should create 3 new structures to put in the union? One for traditional, one for pcre and one for tag patterns? Is this what you mean? > Are you sure you attached the right patch? host_traditional_matches / Yes. I've added a level: host_matches() to be clearer. \ host_pcre_matches What's wrong? venom00 |