From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-03-30 20:38:42
|
Bugs item #711668, was opened at 2003-03-28 21:28 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=111118&aid=711668&group_id=11118 Category: os2-specific Group: version 3.0 Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Mediavilla (davidme) Assigned to: David Schmidt (david__schmidt) Summary: Broken PDFs with OS/2 Initial Comment: After installing 3.0.2 for OS/2, the documentation PDFs are broken. The files are: 25/08/02 19:41 124.685 0 privoxy-developer-manual.pdf 25/08/02 19:41 124.285 0 privoxy-faq.pdf 25/08/02 19:41 334.316 0 privoxy-user-manual.pdf GSView 4.0 with ChostScript 7.0.3 tells that the error is : Scanning PDF file Unrecoverable error: syntaxerror in readxref Acrobat 3.0 simply says that there is an irrecoverable error. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: David Schmidt (david__schmidt) Date: 2003-03-30 15:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=249980 Hal - I'm sure we discussed it, and I'm sure I forgot it. I promise to stick a 'wget' in the OS/2 build script to yank it off the web next time... - David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Burgiss (hal9) Date: 2003-03-29 18:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=322640 First, I am committing fresh PDFs to cvs. Sorry David, or anyone that was depending on these. I thought we had had this conversation before and decided to move away from keeping docs in cvs, and in fact, had decided that PDF docs would be kept on the website (and not cvs). But maybe not ;-) OES, your proposal sounds fine to me, but I'd like to hear from some other packagers, and see what is easiest for them. This is essentially adding a step for packagers, which certainly is no big deal. So now we have txt, html, and pdf. Do we want to have a zip archive for each? One big zip file? Should it be public, or just there for packagers? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andreas Oesterhelt (oes) Date: 2003-03-29 10:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=78811 The PDF docs in CVS are very old. Keeping genereated stuff in CVS does suck big time, but there needs to be a way to build packages without jade, docbook & tools available. How about this: Whoever does the release must, after freezing, but before src package upload, update the docs on the webserver, incl. text, pdf, README etc. The package build targets then suck the docs from privoxy.org. We delete generated docs from CVS once and for all. Any objections / ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Schmidt (david__schmidt) Date: 2003-03-29 08:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=249980 Looks like bad .pdfs made it into the OS/2 package. The soonest I can rebuild it is Monday. - David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Mediavilla (davidme) Date: 2003-03-28 22:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=595264 The PDFs from the .zip at privoxy.org work OK. The ones I listed are those present in privoxyos2_setup_3.0.2.exe. So it seems that corrupt files were shipped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Burgiss (hal9) Date: 2003-03-28 21:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=322640 PS -- Those timestamps look like 3.0.0 time frame. Are they accurate? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Burgiss (hal9) Date: 2003-03-28 21:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=322640 David, thanks! Unfortunately, I downloaded the 3.0.2 PDF docs from the website, and they are all readable with Acrobat, Ghostview, and xpdf on Linux, with no problems. Soooo....I am guessing we have a corruption problem in the OS/2 packaging process or some other platform specific issue. Can you try the ones posted on http://privoxy.org (assuming you are talking about different ones, of course)? TIA. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=111118&aid=711668&group_id=11118 |