Re: wishlist: dynamic updates
Brought to you by:
captnmark
From: Chris A. <ca...@kc...> - 2001-07-13 23:22:22
|
Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > > Erm... If someone read my statements as Mark-bashing: It wasn't > meant that way. He made great job until 1.0.4 and his experimental 1.1 > tree contains a lot of nice things, alot of cleanups having been > neccessary for a long time. But he also complicated things alot (for both > users and developers) and I don't like the approach to split icewm into > separate applications. Being monolith isn't supposed to be nice... but > it's one of the reasons for IceWM's speed. Well. Maybe icewm could be > modulized by using dynamic loadable modules... But this also adds > complexity... I think that going moduler would be a mistake. I was attracted to iceWM because it is so small and simple, yet functional and nicely configurable. If you start getting into modules and such, you'll end up with another fvwm on your hands. Just my two-cents. |