Re: ice-rox

[Christophe B. <mai...@fr...>]

IMO, Rox is really convenient to use, fast, ...

The *only* negative point I found is the incompatibility with icedock.

Acutally icedock is trying to put itself below the desktop, and so
*behind* rox pinboard (and background manager).

Beyond that, rox is cool :)

Tof


On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 08:25, any...@gm... wrote:
> Hi,
> I intend to use the combo of ice and rox (only as filer and pinboard) for a 
> large amount of systems.
> >From a friend I heard that ice is rockstable.
> I don't know about rox though.
> On the other hand everybuddy uses his system in a different way and so he 
> might always automatically make his way around some nasty bugs which others 
> find quite often.
> *Don't* wanna start a flame ;-) I'm just interested in the negative news 
> about these two progs as I can decide based on that if this combo is usable 
> for unexperienced users (mostly kids who will brake whatever they can ;-)) or 
> not.
> 
> Using:
> rox-base-1.0.2-1.noarch.rpm
> rox-1.2.0-2.i386.rpm
> icewm-default-1.0.9-2.i386.rpm
> icewm-common-1.0.9-2.noarch.rpm
> icewm-themes-1.0.3-4.noarch.rpm
> 
> so far didn't find *any* bugs /probs - but you never know...
> 
> thanks and regards,
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> _______________________________________________
> IceWM-user mailing list
> Ice...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icewm-user
>