htmlvalidator-help Mailing List for HTML Validator for Mozilla and Firefox
Brought to you by:
mgueury
Menu
▾
▴
htmlvalidator-help — Help for HTML Validator extension for Firefox
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(65) |
Jun
(52) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(48) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Gabriel L. <li...@je...> - 2008-03-31 09:56:31
|
Hi Marc, Sure I understand : I didn't want the 0.844 specifically, I was just wondering why the sources where at 0.843 while the Linux version was at 0.844 ;) I am currently running a snapshot of OpenBSD 4.3, but when the final OpenBSD 4.3 will be available I will build a XPI of your extension and send it to you. On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:36:02 +0100 Marc Gueury <mg...@sk...> wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > > The main reason is that my life is currently a never ending story of > running in all directions > It is fun, but in short, I had no enough time to spend on the > extension in the last weeks :-) > > Anyway, when I have read your post in the forum, I knew already that > there is a problem with the version 0.844. > There was a XPCOM change introduced in Firefox 3 beta 4. Due to it, > the part of the extension in C would need to be recompiled on all > platforms to work with the final Firefox 3. That is why I spent my > time doing the 0.845 version. > > I can put the version 0.844 but if you have understood, it will not > work with the final Firefox 3. > If you have a version 0.845, do not hesitate to mail me directly and > I will put it on the site. > > Thanks, > > Marc |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2008-03-26 21:36:11
|
Hi Gabriel, The main reason is that my life is currently a never ending story of running in all directions It is fun, but in short, I had no enough time to spend on the extension in the last weeks :-) Anyway, when I have read your post in the forum, I knew already that there is a problem with the version 0.844. There was a XPCOM change introduced in Firefox 3 beta 4. Due to it, the part of the extension in C would need to be recompiled on all platforms to work with the final Firefox 3. That is why I spent my time doing the 0.845 version. I can put the version 0.844 but if you have understood, it will not work with the final Firefox 3. If you have a version 0.845, do not hesitate to mail me directly and I will put it on the site. Thanks, Marc Gabriel Linder wrote: > Hi, > > On the download page[1], the latest and greatest is 0.844 for Linux. I > have to compile the extension myself for OpenBSD, but the source > package is only at 0.843, why ? > > By the way is there any OpenBSD user right here interested by running > this extension with native OpenBSD Firefox ? I can provide a method to > build the extension (need cleanup, but it works) or binary xpi at your > convenience. > > > > [1] http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/download.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > > |
|
From: Gabriel L. <li...@je...> - 2008-03-21 08:57:33
|
Hi, On the download page[1], the latest and greatest is 0.844 for Linux. I have to compile the extension myself for OpenBSD, but the source package is only at 0.843, why ? By the way is there any OpenBSD user right here interested by running this extension with native OpenBSD Firefox ? I can provide a method to build the extension (need cleanup, but it works) or binary xpi at your convenience. [1] http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/download.html |
|
From: Benjamin D. <ben...@gm...> - 2008-03-12 01:42:40
|
Hello, I have compiled a xpi of the latest version 0.8.4.4 for Linux x86_64. I have uploaded it to: http://www.file-upload.net/download-721821/tidy_firefox_linux64_0844.xpi.html Compiled on Ubuntu 7.10 with gcc 4.1.2 and glibc 2.6.1 Regards, Benjamin Drung |
|
From: Werner F. <wer...@uf...> - 2008-01-19 11:20:33
|
Hi Marc, I had the 64 bit version installed before, I just switched from 64bit FF to 32bit. On first start of 32bit FF, I was lead to the error page for the first time. I then uninstalled 64bit HTML validator, restarted FF and installed the 32bit HTML validator from the download page. The following errors are shown in the OP. So I now use the localized FF provided by http://firefox-browser.de. It works, same profile. No hassle with HTML validator. Thanks for your help! Regards, Werner Marc Gueury schrieb: > Hi Werner, > > If I understand, you use the 32 bits of Firefox on a Linux 64 bits ? > I would think to try 2 things: > - be sure to use the Firefox distributed by mozilla.org and not the one > of your OS > - maybe try the 32 bits version of the extension and the 64 bit one to > see if it change something: > > See here: > http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/download.html > > Good luck ! > > Marc > > > Werner Flamme wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> again me with the same problem :-( You helped me before (Feb 2007, for >> example) when you put my nose on the doc, I hope you succeed this >> time, too ;-) >> >> Well, I use openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 and - because I want to use Java - >> the 32bit Version of Firefox 2.0.0.11. >> >> On starting FF, I am thrown to a page that tells me "FATAL ERROR : The >> dynamic C library contained in the extension file could not be >> found." This is independent of my selection of the validation method. >> >> So I follow the link to >> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/faq.html#LINUX and find the >> usual solution, ldd. I get: >> >> ~/.mozilla/firefox/g87hlvrl.default/extensions/{3b56bcc7-54e5-44a2-9b44-66c3ef58c13e}/components> >> ldd libnstidy.so >> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) >> libxpcom.so => /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.8.1.10/libxpcom.so >> (0xf7d7e000) >> libplds4.so => /usr/lib/libplds4.so (0xf7d7a000) >> libplc4.so => /usr/lib/libplc4.so (0xf7d74000) >> libnspr4.so => /usr/lib/libnspr4.so (0xf7d3f000) >> libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xf7d27000) >> libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xf7d23000) >> libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0xf7c62000) >> libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xf7c3d000) >> libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xf7c31000) >> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xf7afe000) >> libxul.so => /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.8.1.10/libxul.so (0xf7062000) >> libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xf6f74000) >> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x56555000) >> libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0xf6f54000) >> libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0xf6f2f000) >> libmozjs.so => /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.8.1.10/libmozjs.so >> (0xf6e9f000) >> libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0xf6e8b000) >> libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xf6d70000) >> libXft.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXft.so.2 (0xf6d5d000) >> libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0xf6d54000) >> libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0xf6d28000) >> libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0xf6cb9000) >> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0xf6947000) >> libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0xf68c3000) >> libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0xf68a8000) >> libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 >> (0xf688f000) >> libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 >> (0xf6885000) >> libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0xf6849000) >> libcairo.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0xf67ca000) >> libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0xf678f000) >> libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0xf678a000) >> libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0xf66e9000) >> libXt.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 (0xf6698000) >> libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0xf6693000) >> libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 >> (0xf6664000) >> libxcb-xlib.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0 (0xf6661000) >> libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0xf6648000) >> libexpat.so.1 => /lib/libexpat.so.1 (0xf6627000) >> libXcomposite.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcomposite.so.1 (0xf6623000) >> libXdamage.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXdamage.so.1 (0xf661e000) >> libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0xf6618000) >> libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0xf6609000) >> libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0xf6605000) >> libXi.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXi.so.6 (0xf65fc000) >> libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0xf65f4000) >> libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0xf65ea000) >> libglitz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libglitz.so.1 (0xf65c3000) >> libxcb-render-util.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-render-util.so.0 >> (0xf65be000) >> libxcb-render.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-render.so.0 (0xf65b6000) >> libpcre.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpcre.so.0 (0xf658d000) >> libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 (0xf6584000) >> libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 (0xf656b000) >> librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0xf6562000) >> libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0xf655e000) >> >> I do not see a missing library. I do not see a 64bit library, they are >> all in /usr/lib64. >> >> After adding /usr/lib/firefox (before xulrunner) to the ldconfig files >> and running ldconfig as root, I get: >> >> ldd libnstidy.so >> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) >> libxpcom.so => /usr/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so (0xf7def000) >> libplds4.so => /usr/lib/libplds4.so (0xf7deb000) >> libplc4.so => /usr/lib/libplc4.so (0xf7de5000) >> libnspr4.so => /usr/lib/libnspr4.so (0xf7db0000) >> libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xf7d98000) >> libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xf7d94000) >> libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0xf7cd3000) >> libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xf7cae000) >> libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xf7ca2000) >> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xf7b6f000) >> libxpcom_core.so => /usr/lib/firefox/libxpcom_core.so >> (0xf7adc000) >> libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xf79ee000) >> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x56555000) >> >> Hm. We are not amused ;-) >> >> What will be the reason for the eror, when ldconfig tells me all >> libraries are present? At the bottom of the Errors/FAQ page, you give >> instructions how to create a debug file, but the directory contains >> files from last August only, though I'm reproducing the bug on every >> restart of FF. I will disable HTML validator now to get FF working :-( >> >> Regards, >> Werner >> -- Werner Flamme, Abt. WKDV Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung GmbH - UFZ Permoserstr. 15 - 04318 Leipzig Tel.: (0341) 235-1921 - Fax (0341) 235-451921 http://www.ufz.de - eMail: wer...@uf... |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2008-01-19 11:02:58
|
Hi Werner, If I understand, you use the 32 bits of Firefox on a Linux 64 bits ? I would think to try 2 things: - be sure to use the Firefox distributed by mozilla.org and not the one of your OS - maybe try the 32 bits version of the extension and the 64 bit one to see if it change something: See here: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/download.html Good luck ! Marc Werner Flamme wrote: > Hi Marc, > > again me with the same problem :-( You helped me before (Feb 2007, for > example) when you put my nose on the doc, I hope you succeed this time, > too ;-) > > Well, I use openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 and - because I want to use Java - the > 32bit Version of Firefox 2.0.0.11. > > On starting FF, I am thrown to a page that tells me "FATAL ERROR : The > dynamic C library contained in the extension file could not be found." > This is independent of my selection of the validation method. > > So I follow the link to > http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/faq.html#LINUX and find the usual > solution, ldd. I get: > > ~/.mozilla/firefox/g87hlvrl.default/extensions/{3b56bcc7-54e5-44a2-9b44-66c3ef58c13e}/components> > ldd libnstidy.so > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) > libxpcom.so => /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.8.1.10/libxpcom.so (0xf7d7e000) > libplds4.so => /usr/lib/libplds4.so (0xf7d7a000) > libplc4.so => /usr/lib/libplc4.so (0xf7d74000) > libnspr4.so => /usr/lib/libnspr4.so (0xf7d3f000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xf7d27000) > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xf7d23000) > libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0xf7c62000) > libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xf7c3d000) > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xf7c31000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xf7afe000) > libxul.so => /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.8.1.10/libxul.so (0xf7062000) > libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xf6f74000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x56555000) > libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0xf6f54000) > libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0xf6f2f000) > libmozjs.so => /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.8.1.10/libmozjs.so (0xf6e9f000) > libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0xf6e8b000) > libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xf6d70000) > libXft.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXft.so.2 (0xf6d5d000) > libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0xf6d54000) > libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0xf6d28000) > libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0xf6cb9000) > libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0xf6947000) > libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0xf68c3000) > libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0xf68a8000) > libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 > (0xf688f000) > libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 > (0xf6885000) > libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0xf6849000) > libcairo.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0xf67ca000) > libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0xf678f000) > libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0xf678a000) > libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0xf66e9000) > libXt.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 (0xf6698000) > libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0xf6693000) > libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0xf6664000) > libxcb-xlib.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0 (0xf6661000) > libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0xf6648000) > libexpat.so.1 => /lib/libexpat.so.1 (0xf6627000) > libXcomposite.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcomposite.so.1 (0xf6623000) > libXdamage.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXdamage.so.1 (0xf661e000) > libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0xf6618000) > libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0xf6609000) > libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0xf6605000) > libXi.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXi.so.6 (0xf65fc000) > libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0xf65f4000) > libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0xf65ea000) > libglitz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libglitz.so.1 (0xf65c3000) > libxcb-render-util.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-render-util.so.0 > (0xf65be000) > libxcb-render.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-render.so.0 (0xf65b6000) > libpcre.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpcre.so.0 (0xf658d000) > libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 (0xf6584000) > libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 (0xf656b000) > librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0xf6562000) > libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0xf655e000) > > I do not see a missing library. I do not see a 64bit library, they are > all in /usr/lib64. > > After adding /usr/lib/firefox (before xulrunner) to the ldconfig files > and running ldconfig as root, I get: > > ldd libnstidy.so > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) > libxpcom.so => /usr/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so (0xf7def000) > libplds4.so => /usr/lib/libplds4.so (0xf7deb000) > libplc4.so => /usr/lib/libplc4.so (0xf7de5000) > libnspr4.so => /usr/lib/libnspr4.so (0xf7db0000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xf7d98000) > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xf7d94000) > libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0xf7cd3000) > libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xf7cae000) > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xf7ca2000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xf7b6f000) > libxpcom_core.so => /usr/lib/firefox/libxpcom_core.so (0xf7adc000) > libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xf79ee000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x56555000) > > Hm. We are not amused ;-) > > What will be the reason for the eror, when ldconfig tells me all > libraries are present? At the bottom of the Errors/FAQ page, you give > instructions how to create a debug file, but the directory contains > files from last August only, though I'm reproducing the bug on every > restart of FF. I will disable HTML validator now to get FF working :-( > > Regards, > Werner > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > > |
|
From: Werner F. <wer...@uf...> - 2008-01-19 10:51:24
|
Hi Marc, again me with the same problem :-( You helped me before (Feb 2007, for example) when you put my nose on the doc, I hope you succeed this time, too ;-) Well, I use openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 and - because I want to use Java - the 32bit Version of Firefox 2.0.0.11. On starting FF, I am thrown to a page that tells me "FATAL ERROR : The dynamic C library contained in the extension file could not be found." This is independent of my selection of the validation method. So I follow the link to http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/faq.html#LINUX and find the usual solution, ldd. I get: ~/.mozilla/firefox/g87hlvrl.default/extensions/{3b56bcc7-54e5-44a2-9b44-66c3ef58c13e}/components> ldd libnstidy.so linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) libxpcom.so => /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.8.1.10/libxpcom.so (0xf7d7e000) libplds4.so => /usr/lib/libplds4.so (0xf7d7a000) libplc4.so => /usr/lib/libplc4.so (0xf7d74000) libnspr4.so => /usr/lib/libnspr4.so (0xf7d3f000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xf7d27000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xf7d23000) libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0xf7c62000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xf7c3d000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xf7c31000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xf7afe000) libxul.so => /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.8.1.10/libxul.so (0xf7062000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xf6f74000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x56555000) libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0xf6f54000) libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0xf6f2f000) libmozjs.so => /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.8.1.10/libmozjs.so (0xf6e9f000) libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0xf6e8b000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xf6d70000) libXft.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXft.so.2 (0xf6d5d000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0xf6d54000) libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0xf6d28000) libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0xf6cb9000) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0xf6947000) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0xf68c3000) libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0xf68a8000) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0xf688f000) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (0xf6885000) libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0xf6849000) libcairo.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0xf67ca000) libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0xf678f000) libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0xf678a000) libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0xf66e9000) libXt.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 (0xf6698000) libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0xf6693000) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0xf6664000) libxcb-xlib.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0 (0xf6661000) libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0xf6648000) libexpat.so.1 => /lib/libexpat.so.1 (0xf6627000) libXcomposite.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcomposite.so.1 (0xf6623000) libXdamage.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXdamage.so.1 (0xf661e000) libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0xf6618000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0xf6609000) libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0xf6605000) libXi.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXi.so.6 (0xf65fc000) libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0xf65f4000) libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0xf65ea000) libglitz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libglitz.so.1 (0xf65c3000) libxcb-render-util.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-render-util.so.0 (0xf65be000) libxcb-render.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-render.so.0 (0xf65b6000) libpcre.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpcre.so.0 (0xf658d000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 (0xf6584000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 (0xf656b000) librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0xf6562000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0xf655e000) I do not see a missing library. I do not see a 64bit library, they are all in /usr/lib64. After adding /usr/lib/firefox (before xulrunner) to the ldconfig files and running ldconfig as root, I get: ldd libnstidy.so linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) libxpcom.so => /usr/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so (0xf7def000) libplds4.so => /usr/lib/libplds4.so (0xf7deb000) libplc4.so => /usr/lib/libplc4.so (0xf7de5000) libnspr4.so => /usr/lib/libnspr4.so (0xf7db0000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xf7d98000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xf7d94000) libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0xf7cd3000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xf7cae000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xf7ca2000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xf7b6f000) libxpcom_core.so => /usr/lib/firefox/libxpcom_core.so (0xf7adc000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xf79ee000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x56555000) Hm. We are not amused ;-) What will be the reason for the eror, when ldconfig tells me all libraries are present? At the bottom of the Errors/FAQ page, you give instructions how to create a debug file, but the directory contains files from last August only, though I'm reproducing the bug on every restart of FF. I will disable HTML validator now to get FF working :-( Regards, Werner |
|
From: Kazuhito K. <kaz...@gm...> - 2007-12-03 05:09:21
|
I'm so sorry about this - PLEASE ignore and delete this e-mail. This wasn't sent by me, but by SNS named Yaari, which take Google e-mail addresses automatically. 2007/11/29, Kazuhito <kaz...@gm...>: > > Kazuhito > Kazuhito Kidachi wants you to join Yaari! > Is Kazuhito your friend? > [image: Yes]<http://www.yaari.com/y-register.php?i=9LSGN378ECA5NA1Q1196286757> [image: > No] <http://www.yaari.com/y-register.php?i=no> > Please respond or Kazuhito might think you said no :( > > > To stop receiving emails from Yaari.com, click here<http://yaari.com/y-email-opt-out.php?param=aHRtbHZhbGlkYXRvci1oZWxwQGxpc3RzLnNvdXJjZWZvcmdlLm5ldA%3D%3D>. > > If you have any concerns regarding the content of this message, please > email ab...@ya.... > Yaari LLC, 358 Angier Ave, Atlanta, GA 30312 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper > from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going > mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. > http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > > -- Kazuhito Kidachi mailto:kaz...@gm... |
|
From: Kazuhito <kaz...@gm...> - 2007-11-28 23:50:54
|
CjxodG1sPgo8aGVhZD4KPC9oZWFkPgo8Ym9keT4KPHRhYmxlIGFsaWduPSJjZW50ZXIiIHdpZHRo PSI1NTAiIGhlaWdodD0iMjQ2IgpiYWNrZ3JvdW5kPSJodHRwOi8veWFhcmkuY29tL3ktdmlyYWwv aW1nL2JveC1hbGwuanBnIj48dHI+PHRkPgogIDxkaXYgaWQ9ImNvbnRhaW5lciIKc3R5bGU9InRl eHQtYWxpZ246Y2VudGVyO2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlZlcmRhbmEsQXJpYWw7Zm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6Ym9s ZDtmb250LXNpemU6MTFwdDsiPgogICAgPHRhYmxlIHdpZHRoPSI5NyUiIGhlaWdodD0iOTAlIiBh bGlnbj0iY2VudGVyIiBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLXRvcDoxMHB4OyI+CiAgICAgIDx0ciB2YWxpZ249 Im1pZGRsZSI+CiAgICAgICAgPHRkIHdpZHRoPSIyMCUiPgogICAgICAgICAgPGltZyBzcmM9Imh0 dHA6Ly93d3cueWFhcmkuY29tL3VzZXJfMTAwcHhwaWMvbm9faW1nX2JpZy5qcGciCnN0eWxlPSJk aXNwbGF5OmJsb2NrO21hcmdpbjphdXRvO21hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTBweDtib3JkZXI6bm9uZTsi IC8+CiAgICAgICAgICA8ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6OXB0O3RleHQtYWxpZ246Y2VudGVy OyI+S2F6dWhpdG88L2Rpdj4KICAgICAgICAgIDxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTo5cHQ7Y29s b3I6I0IwMDt0ZXh0LWFsaWduOmNlbnRlcjsiPjwvZGl2PgogICAgICAgIDwvdGQ+CiAgICAgICAg PHRkPgogICAgICAgICAgPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0idGV4dC1hbGlnbjpjZW50ZXI7Ij5LYXp1aGl0byBL aWRhY2hpIHdhbnRzIHlvdSB0byBqb2luIFlhYXJpITwvZGl2PgogICAgICAgICAgPGRpdgpzdHls ZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEzcHQ7bWFyZ2luLXRvcDozNXB4O21hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTBweDt0ZXh0 LWFsaWduOmNlbnRlcjtmb250LXdlaWdodDpib2xkOyI+SXMKS2F6dWhpdG8geW91ciBmcmllbmQ/ PC9kaXY+CiAgICAgICAgICA8ZGl2IGFsaWduPSJjZW50ZXIiIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW46MjVweDt0 ZXh0LWFsaWduOmNlbnRlcjsiPgogICAgICAgICAgICA8YSBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlhYXJp LmNvbS95LXJlZ2lzdGVyLnBocD9pPTlMU0dOMzc4RUNBNU5BMVExMTk2Mjg2NzU3Ij4KICAgICAg ICAgICAgICA8aW1nIHNyYz0iaHR0cDovL3lhYXJpLmNvbS95LXZpcmFsL2ltZy9idXR0b24teWVz LmdpZiIgYWx0PSJZZXMiCnN0eWxlPSJib3JkZXI6bm9uZTttYXJnaW46MCA1cHg7Ii8+PC9hPgog ICAgICAgICAgICA8YSBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlhYXJpLmNvbS95LXJlZ2lzdGVyLnBocD9p PW5vIj4KICAgICAgICAgICAgICA8aW1nIHNyYz0iaHR0cDovL3lhYXJpLmNvbS95LXZpcmFsL2lt Zy9idXR0b24tbm8uZ2lmIiBhbHQ9Ik5vIgpzdHlsZT0iYm9yZGVyOm5vbmU7bWFyZ2luOjAgNXB4 OyIgLz48L2E+CiAgICAgICAgICA8L2Rpdj4KICAgICAgICAgIDxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6 ZTo5cHQ7dGV4dC1hbGlnbjpjZW50ZXI7Ij5QbGVhc2UgcmVzcG9uZCBvciBLYXp1aGl0byBtaWdo dCB0aGluayB5b3UKc2FpZCBubyA6KDwvZGl2PgogICAgICAgIDwvdGQ+CiAgICAgIDwvdHI+CiAg ICA8L3RhYmxlPgogIDwvZGl2Pgo8L3RkPjwvdHI+PC90YWJsZT4KPHAgYWxpZ249ImNlbnRlciIg c3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMHB0Ij4KICA8YnIgLz4KICBUbyBzdG9wIHJlY2VpdmluZyBlbWFp bHMgZnJvbSBZYWFyaS5jb20sIGNsaWNrIDxhCmhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly95YWFyaS5jb20veS1lbWFp bC1vcHQtb3V0LnBocD9wYXJhbT1hSFJ0YkhaaGJHbGtZWFJ2Y2kxb1pXeHdRR3hwYzNSekxuTnZk WEpqWldadmNtZGxMbTVsZEElM0QlM0QiPmhlcmU8L2E+LgogIDxiciAvPgogIElmIHlvdSBoYXZl IGFueSBjb25jZXJucyByZWdhcmRpbmcgdGhlIGNvbnRlbnQgb2YgdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlLCBwbGVh c2UgZW1haWwgYWJ1c2VAeWFhcmkuY29tLgogIDxiciAvPgogIDxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNp emU6OHB0Ij5ZYWFyaSBMTEMsIDM1OCBBbmdpZXIgQXZlLCBBdGxhbnRhLCBHQSAKMzAzMTI8L3Nw YW4+CjwvcD4KPC9ib2R5Pgo8L2h0bWw+Cg== |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-08-27 07:06:22
|
Hi Matt, Wondefull, I will place it on the website ! Some other people are trying to compile it on several other platforms (also in x86-64) and have linking problem. So, this helps a lot ! Thanks, Marc Matt wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello all, > > I have compiled a xpi of the latest 0.8.x branch for Linux x86_64. it is > available at: > > http://indexof.co.uk/HtmlValidator-0.8.4.1-x86-64/ > > Changes to get it to compile cleanly are available at: > > http://indexof.co.uk/HtmlValidator-0.7.9.5-x86-64/ > (the changes don't differ much) > > Was compiled on Gentoo-2007.0: > > gcc-4.1.2 > glibc-2.6.1 > > Regards, > > Matthew Lawrence > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFG0dxvQGTWuYy4LG8RAketAJ9JTH+QmNFwXHIytsGXK/aqclet8wCePoUO > gqqyQgcv8ahijoZe2432yMg= > =+01B > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > > |
|
From: Matt <fw...@ds...> - 2007-08-26 20:03:12
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I have compiled a xpi of the latest 0.8.x branch for Linux x86_64. it is available at: http://indexof.co.uk/HtmlValidator-0.8.4.1-x86-64/ Changes to get it to compile cleanly are available at: http://indexof.co.uk/HtmlValidator-0.7.9.5-x86-64/ (the changes don't differ much) Was compiled on Gentoo-2007.0: gcc-4.1.2 glibc-2.6.1 Regards, Matthew Lawrence -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG0dxvQGTWuYy4LG8RAketAJ9JTH+QmNFwXHIytsGXK/aqclet8wCePoUO gqqyQgcv8ahijoZe2432yMg= =+01B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Kazuhito K. <kaz...@gm...> - 2007-07-30 04:26:06
|
Hello Marc, As you probably know, W3C/QA has released new version of Markup Validator. [ANN] Markup Validator 0.8.0 released from olivier Thereaux on 2007-07-25 (www...@w3... from July 2007) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2007Jul/0138.html Does this release impact to the current version of your extension? I mean, does the extension show the same parsing result with Markup Validator 0.8.0 at this moment? Best, Kazuhito -- Kazuhito Kidachi mailto:kaz...@gm... |
|
From: Colin B. <Col...@of...> - 2007-07-18 18:07:23
|
Since rebuilding my dev workstation I noticed that the HTML Validator cause= s Firefox to crash. If I start in safe mode and disable the validator it w= orks, but when I enable it with a page loaded it crashes. Any thoughts on = next steps for troubleshooting? Thanks, Colin |
|
From: Werner F. <wer...@uf...> - 2007-07-10 14:29:03
|
Matthew Boehm schrieb: > HI, > I'm running Firefox 2.0.0.4 on Fedora 7 on an x86_64 machine. This is > the only extension that I cannot get working. Does anyone out there have > a 64bit version they can send me? > > Thanks, > Matthew Matthew, as you use a rpm based distri, you may try the rpm provided on http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/download_070.html. At least on openSUSE 10.2 x86_64 it works great. Or you look on http://www.html-validator.org/ for another possibility ;-) - the 0.8x is not available as x86_64 yet, I am waiting for a long time... HTH Werner -- Werner Flamme, Abt. WKDV Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung GmbH - UFZ Permoserstr. 15 - 04318 Leipzig Tel.: (0341) 235-3921 - Fax (0341) 235-453921 http://www.ufz.de - eMail: wer...@uf... |
|
From: Matthew B. <htm...@ma...> - 2007-07-05 22:30:53
|
HI, I'm running Firefox 2.0.0.4 on Fedora 7 on an x86_64 machine. This is the only extension that I cannot get working. Does anyone out there have a 64bit version they can send me? Thanks, Matthew |
|
From: NoWhereMan <now...@fl...> - 2007-06-10 10:10:38
|
I still think this bug is more related to gtk+firefox than to htmlvalidator, but in the meantime it would be nice a workaround, as explained http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=211&can=2&q=gnome (firebug bug, but applies to htmlvalidator as well... actually I've discovered it *in* htmlvalidator) sorry for "bugging" :) It's not a serious issue anyway, just a bit annoying -- NoWhereMan (e.v.) -- http://www.nowhereland.it -- http://flatpress.nowhereland.it |
|
From: Werner F. <wer...@uf...> - 2007-06-06 16:56:29
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Morris Fassberg schrieb am 07.05.2007 16:33: > I downloaded the html validator for firefox, but It does not work. > I cannot get it to operate. > > Morris Fassberg Hi Morris, after you read http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/faq.html and checked every item, what exactly is the problem? "does not work" is nothing you will get help with... Regards, Werner - -- Werner Flamme, Abt. WKDV Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung GmbH - UFZ Permoserstr. 15 - 04318 Leipzig Tel.: (0341) 235-3921 - Fax (0341) 235-453921 http://www.ufz.de - eMail: wer...@uf... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGZucrk33Krq8b42MRAkjiAJ40mNntTxLuLMtmFU9GlkRHPgaPqQCdGNPz a7s2gvjOlnvruTo6QQDWRRY= =xlSA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Kristof M. <kr...@kr...> - 2007-05-15 19:09:36
|
Hi, I installed the extension, the latest version (0,839) on Ubuntu Feisty, 32 bit. But every time I install/reopen the browser, it asks me which validator to choose. I installed the package tidy, and libstdc++5 (was already installed), but none solve the issue. Should Kristof Mattei <http://www.kristofmattei.be/> kr...@kr... |
|
From: Morris F. <jew...@er...> - 2007-05-07 14:33:55
|
I downloaded the html validator for firefox, but It does not work. I cannot get it to operate. Morris Fassberg |
|
From: <te...@al...> - 2007-05-01 18:11:10
|
Thanks, that explains why others seemed to be getting this to work. The computer I mostly use the extension on does not have a local server installed. I have since found that using the 'Page Source' option will do the validation without changing the general enable/disable; however 0.8.3.5 seems to be working just fine, so I'll probably just stick with that for now. Thanks again for a valuable extension and your quick response. If you can add this ability into 0.840 that would be wonderful. > Hello, > > I have added this in the todos. It is a corner case I never thought > about and that is not possible unhappily. > You can have a local server to wa the issue and enable the validation of > http://localhost/ in place.. > > Anyway, I add this in the todos of 0.840. > > Marc > > te...@al... wrote: >> I really like the extension. I am using version 0.8.3.5 and would >> like to update to the current version since I believe the one I have >> is a beta. But I like to use the following list of domains to >> validate: >> mysite1.org,mysite2.com, localhost. This works fine in 0.8.3.5 but >> although I can add the others just fine to the Allow list in the new >> version, I cannot get localhost (pages still on my computer and not >> yet uploaded) to be added to the Allow list. I saw a post saying to >> right-click the icon to allow it, but the only option for local pages >> seems to be a general Enable for everything. Firefox 2.0.0.3 on Win >> XP if it mattters. Thanks >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take >> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. >> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Htmlvalidator-help mailing list >> Htm...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help >> >> |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-05-01 08:25:59
|
Hello, I have added this in the todos. It is a corner case I never thought about and that is not possible unhappily. You can have a local server to wa the issue and enable the validation of http://localhost/ in place.. Anyway, I add this in the todos of 0.840. Marc te...@al... wrote: > I really like the extension. I am using version 0.8.3.5 and would like to > update to the current version since I believe the one I have is a beta. > But I like to use the following list of domains to validate: > mysite1.org,mysite2.com, localhost. This works fine in 0.8.3.5 but > although I can add the others just fine to the Allow list in the new > version, I cannot get localhost (pages still on my computer and not yet > uploaded) to be added to the Allow list. I saw a post saying to > right-click the icon to allow it, but the only option for local pages > seems to be a general Enable for everything. Firefox 2.0.0.3 on Win XP if > it mattters. Thanks > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > > |
|
From: Michael H. <mi...@mi...> - 2007-04-30 23:47:29
|
> Anyway, please do this: > - First, right click on the extension and choose disable > - Then go to your favorite domain > - Right click on the icon and choose : Enable for yourdomain.com > That works. Thanks! > Since file:// is not a possible > option in the new firefox filter. > Is it what you need ? What I need is to validate only pages that start with http://localhost; I don't need to validate raw files. Thanks again, Michael |
|
From: <te...@al...> - 2007-04-30 03:23:13
|
I really like the extension. I am using version 0.8.3.5 and would like to update to the current version since I believe the one I have is a beta. But I like to use the following list of domains to validate: mysite1.org,mysite2.com, localhost. This works fine in 0.8.3.5 but although I can add the others just fine to the Allow list in the new version, I cannot get localhost (pages still on my computer and not yet uploaded) to be added to the Allow list. I saw a post saying to right-click the icon to allow it, but the only option for local pages seems to be a general Enable for everything. Firefox 2.0.0.3 on Win XP if it mattters. Thanks |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-04-27 21:38:22
|
Hi Michael, I tried to use the new functionality with the new API of Firefox. I know it is different... Anyway, please do this: - First, right click on the extension and choose disable - Then go to your favorite domain - Right click on the icon and choose : Enable for yourdomain.com In the list you should have only : yourdomain.com - Allow. And that's it. Now, I never thought that people would the extension only for local files. I think it is not possible right now. Since file:// is not a possible option in the new firefox filter. Is it what you need ? Thanks, Marc Michael Hartl wrote: > Hi Marc, > > I've been an enthusiastic user of your Firefox HTML validator plugin, > which makes it easy to maintain valid pages when developing web > applications. In particular, I like to use it to validate only local > pages, which avoids the overhead of running all pages through the > validator, while keeping my own local pages clean and shiny. > > This behavior is available in the version I've mostly used (0.7.9.5), > but I recently upgraded to the latest version (0.8.3.9) and I can't > figure out how to restrict validation to localhost. As far as I can > tell, it is now possible to allow or block sites only on a > case-by-case basis. I've searched the web and the mailing list > archive to no avail. Could you tell me how to restrict validation to > particular domains in the latest version? > > Thanks in advance, > > Michael > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > > |
|
From: Michael H. <mi...@mi...> - 2007-04-26 21:45:44
|
Hi Marc, I've been an enthusiastic user of your Firefox HTML validator plugin, which makes it easy to maintain valid pages when developing web applications. In particular, I like to use it to validate only local pages, which avoids the overhead of running all pages through the validator, while keeping my own local pages clean and shiny. This behavior is available in the version I've mostly used (0.7.9.5), but I recently upgraded to the latest version (0.8.3.9) and I can't figure out how to restrict validation to localhost. As far as I can tell, it is now possible to allow or block sites only on a case-by-case basis. I've searched the web and the mailing list archive to no avail. Could you tell me how to restrict validation to particular domains in the latest version? Thanks in advance, Michael |
2 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
