Re: [hotproject-devel] specs updated

[Jimmy J T. <tom...@cs...>]

On 10 Aug 2002, Jamey Sharp wrote:

> Could somebody glance over the specifications to see if there's anything
> important I should change? Bart, it'd be especially useful if you could
> do this.

Just one main thing that I noticed -- the phases in the spec and the
phases in the requirements still don't match.   Should they?  For the sake
of consistency, I would say yes.  

However, the fact that they don't match is/was a major isssue in
determining the outcome of the project, so perhaps it is a good idea to
leave them as they are, and include a short but concise document that
explains why the phases don't match and the controversy that followed.

> 
> Hey, if any of you are like me, you're trying to use hevea to translate
> LaTeX to HTML, and you're running the unstable distribution of Debian.
> Well, hevea doesn't work with unstable's ocaml-base package, version
> 3.05-1, so I had to pin that back to testing with a priority that
> allowed downgrades. But you're probably not like me, so I won't bore you
> with details. :) Just e-mail me if you'd find it useful to know about
> APT pinning.
> -- 
> Jamey Sharp <ja...@sh...> - http://jamey.is.dreaming.org/
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> hotproject-devel mailing list
> hot...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hotproject-devel
>