You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(5) |
2005 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
|
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
2006 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(15) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(12) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
From: M.B. S. <mb....@ar...> - 2005-05-04 16:31:08
|
Jeff Welty schrieb: > Glad you have GWC working! You might look and see if there is an > alsa-devel-1.0.8-0 package for your system. That > may be what you need to compile/link GWC for a native > ALSA environment. Thank you, Jeff, the alsa-devel-1.0.8-0 package is installed on my system, otherwise I would have got compile errors in: ./configure --enable-alsa make The error I was talking about, is a runtime error: "failed to open output device /dev/dsp" and then gwc crashes :-( ALSA lib pcm.c:2068:(snd_pcm_open_noupdate) Unknown PCM /dev/dsp ########################################################## audio_device_open: snd_pcm_open No such file or directory gwc: pcm.c:920: snd_pcm_delay: Assertion `pcm' failed. If anyone as any idea, I will test that. Thank you again - bernhard -- http://www.mb-schiekel.de/ GPG-Key available: GnuPG-1.4.0 |
From: Jeff W. <we...@ya...> - 2005-05-04 12:37:55
|
Bernhard, Glad you have GWC working! You might look and see if there is an alsa-devel-1.0.8-0 package for your system. That may be what you need to compile/link GWC for a native ALSA environment. Thank you for your persistence, and your reports to the list, it will help others! Jeff M.B. Schiekel wrote: >M.B. Schiekel schrieb: > > > >>"failed to open output device /dev/dsp" >>and then gwc crashes :-( >> >> > > >Sorry for spamming the list twice with my question - but after some time >I thought, my first mail was lost. > >Now I've found, that gwc-playback works on my system (that means >/dev/dsp is found), if I configure & make gwc without the --enable-alsa >option. >So I can work with gwc and feel thankful for this wonderful tool. > >But the question remains open for me, why the gwc alsa-option doesn't >work with my alsa-1.0.8-0 environment. >If I could be in any way helpful with testing, I'll like to do that. > >Thank you, >bernhard > > > |
From: M.B. S. <mb....@ar...> - 2005-05-03 13:37:51
|
M.B. Schiekel schrieb: > "failed to open output device /dev/dsp" > and then gwc crashes :-( Sorry for spamming the list twice with my question - but after some time I thought, my first mail was lost. Now I've found, that gwc-playback works on my system (that means /dev/dsp is found), if I configure & make gwc without the --enable-alsa option. So I can work with gwc and feel thankful for this wonderful tool. But the question remains open for me, why the gwc alsa-option doesn't work with my alsa-1.0.8-0 environment. If I could be in any way helpful with testing, I'll like to do that. Thank you, bernhard -- http://www.mb-schiekel.de/ GPG-Key available: GnuPG-1.4.0 |
From: M.B. S. <mb....@ar...> - 2005-05-02 16:24:31
|
Hallo all, sorry for making trouble again. Now after compiling gwc-0.20-10b (with --enable-alsa) and running under KDE-3.3.2a with alsa-1.0.8-0 and with kernel 2.4.20-4GB-athlon I'm getting an error, when starting to play a .wav-file: "failed to open output device /dev/dsp" and then gwc crashes :-( Well, I think, first of all, gwc could handle this error and should not crash. Now the console shows: ALSA lib pcm.c:2068:(snd_pcm_open_noupdate) Unknown PCM /dev/dsp ########################################################## audio_device_open: snd_pcm_open No such file or directory gwc: pcm.c:920: snd_pcm_delay: Assertion `pcm' failed. Before starting gwc I've closed down aRtsd with 'killall artds'. All other sound-applications do work, not only the KDE-stuff, but also gwc-0.17.6 and audicity 1.2.0-pre3 (also using /dev/dsp ). Any help is very much appreciated, thank you. bernhard -- http://www.mb-schiekel.de/ GPG-Key available: GnuPG-1.4.0 |
From: M.B. S. <mb....@ar...> - 2005-05-02 13:20:18
|
Hallo all, sorry for making trouble again. Now after compiling gwc-0.20-10b (with --enable-alsa) and running under KDE-3.3.2a with alsa-1.0.8-0 and with kernel 2.4.20-4GB-athlon I'm getting an error, when starting to play a .wav-file: "failed to open output device /dev/dsp" and then gwc crashes :-( Well, I think, first of all, gwc could handle this error and should not crash. Now the console shows: ALSA lib pcm.c:2068:(snd_pcm_open_noupdate) Unknown PCM /dev/dsp ########################################################## audio_device_open: snd_pcm_open No such file or directory gwc: pcm.c:920: snd_pcm_delay: Assertion `pcm' failed. Before starting gwc I've closed down aRtsd with 'killall artds'. All other sound-applications do work, not only the KDE-stuff, but also gwc-0.17.6 and audicity 1.2.0-pre3 (also using /dev/dsp ). Any help is very much appreciated, thank you. bernhard -- http://www.mb-schiekel.de/ GPG-Key available: GnuPG-1.4.0 |
From: M.B. S. <mb....@ar...> - 2005-04-29 15:22:28
|
M.B. Schiekel schrieb: > 3. Now the next problem is running gwc: > gwc is fine, menus are there, I can load .wav-files - > but most buttons are not visible. When starting gwc from the console > (under KDE-3.3.2a) I got the messages: > --------- > (gwc:6306): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Can not open pixbuf loader module file > '/etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders': No such file or directory > > (gwc:6306): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Error loading XPM image loader: Image > type 'xpm' is not supported > --------- > > Now I have no dir /etc/gtk-2.0 and no file gdk-pixbuf.loaders on my system. Hallo, uff - suse-gnome-morass! SuSE online-update YOU for gtk2.rpm (2.2.1-102) didn't create /etc/gtk-2.0 with gdk-pixbuf.loaders. A deinstallation of gtk2 and new installation (with Yast2 !) fixed this. Now gwc-0.20-10b is complete and I'm happy - thank you! bernhard -- http://www.mb-schiekel.de/ GPG-Key available: GnuPG-1.4.0 |
From: M.B. S. <mb....@ar...> - 2005-04-28 20:10:45
|
Jeff Welty schrieb: > I'm going to put a fix for your problem up to sourceforge.net a little > later. Jeff Martin > submitted a patch which fixes the compile issue with FFTW 2.x > libraries. I don't have > the FFTW 2.x libs installed anymore, so if you haven't already upgraded > to the FFTW > 3.x libs, I'd appreciate it if you could hold off and test gwc-0.20-10b > for me. Thank you, Jeff, 1. the fix for FFTW 2.x is fine and now I can compile gwc. 2. with the linking I got some warnings and errors, but after deinstalling and reinstalling all the SuSE-8.2 stuff for: libgnome, bonobo, gnome-vfs, gconf, gdk-pixbuf, pango I got a fine gwc executable without any more linker-warnings. 3. Now the next problem is running gwc: gwc is fine, menus are there, I can load .wav-files - but most buttons are not visible. When starting gwc from the console (under KDE-3.3.2a) I got the messages: --------- (gwc:6306): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Can not open pixbuf loader module file '/etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders': No such file or directory (gwc:6306): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Error loading XPM image loader: Image type 'xpm' is not supported --------- Now I have no dir /etc/gtk-2.0 and no file gdk-pixbuf.loaders on my system. What I've found is a /opt/gnome/lib/gdk-pixbuf/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so and related files. I'm using gdk-pixbuf 0.18.0-233. Any hints are appreciated. Thank you - bernhard -- http://www.mb-schiekel.de/ GPG-Key available: GnuPG-1.4.0 |
From: Jeff W. <we...@ya...> - 2005-04-27 23:14:52
|
gwc-0.20-10b is on sourceforge. Hopefully it will fix the compilation problems with the fftw 2.x libs. I stopped the current release number at 0.20-10, because the there are a couple of folks working on a version that will compile for OSX as well as linux/bsd. While not posted, there is a gwc-0.21.x series, which will appear when they have finished, and I'll merge back in all the 0.20-10 stuff. I am aware there is some problem with the help menu too. Thanks everyone! jw |
From: Jeff W. <we...@ya...> - 2005-04-27 22:45:35
|
Hi Bernhard, I'm going to put a fix for your problem up to sourceforge.net a little later. Jeff Martin submitted a patch which fixes the compile issue with FFTW 2.x libraries. I don't have the FFTW 2.x libs installed anymore, so if you haven't already upgraded to the FFTW 3.x libs, I'd appreciate it if you could hold off and test gwc-0.20-10b for me. Thanks! jw M.B. Schiekel wrote: >M.B. Schiekel schrieb: > > > >>... I made my last SuSE-online update and it seems that >>this update installed a new gnome file-hierarchy, because I found in >>/opt/gnome2 a file named REMOVE_IN_PROGRESS: >> >>So I think, my GNOME installation is broken by these online-updates and >>I have to find a way to fix it, ... >> >> > > >Well, actually the SuSE-8.2-online update has broken my GNOME >installation. After deinstalling and reinstalling of: >libgnomeui-devel (DVD), libgnome-devel (DVD), libgnomecanvas-devel >(DVD), gtk2-devel (ftp-Update) the missing header-files were there again >and the gwc-make started Ok! > >Next problem is the next compile-error in declick.c >(I'm playing with gwc-0.20-10a under GNOME-2.2.0.1). > >Thank you for your help. >Kind regards, bernhard > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >declick.c: In function `do_declick_fft': >declick.c:575: error: `left' undeclared (first use in this function) >declick.c:575: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once >declick.c:575: error: for each function it appears in.) >declick.c:577: error: `right' undeclared (first use in this function) >declick.c:586: warning: unused variable `y' >declick.c:605: warning: unused variable `click_end' >declick.c:536: warning: unused variable `nclicks_not_repaired_start' >declick.c:538: warning: unused variable `loop_flag' >declick.c:474: warning: unused variable `min_sample' >declick.c:474: warning: unused variable `max_sample' >declick.c:475: warning: unused variable `sample' >declick.c:478: warning: unused variable `n_samples' >declick.c:480: warning: unused variable `n_last_pass' >declick.c:482: warning: unused variable `n' >declick.c:483: warning: unused variable `offset0' >declick.c:483: warning: unused variable `offsetF' >declick.c:500: warning: unused variable `window_overlap' >make: *** [declick.o] Error 1 > > > > |
From: Stewart E. <st...@lu...> - 2005-04-27 21:46:56
|
This looks like a bug with gwc's support for FFTW versions prior to 3. If you can, upgrading to FFTW 3 would probably be the easiest fix. -- Stewart -- Help get Bill Monroe on a US postage stamp! http://www.billmonroestamp.org/ |
From: M.B. S. <mb....@ar...> - 2005-04-27 19:41:35
|
M.B. Schiekel schrieb: > ... I made my last SuSE-online update and it seems that > this update installed a new gnome file-hierarchy, because I found in > /opt/gnome2 a file named REMOVE_IN_PROGRESS: > > So I think, my GNOME installation is broken by these online-updates and > I have to find a way to fix it, ... Well, actually the SuSE-8.2-online update has broken my GNOME installation. After deinstalling and reinstalling of: libgnomeui-devel (DVD), libgnome-devel (DVD), libgnomecanvas-devel (DVD), gtk2-devel (ftp-Update) the missing header-files were there again and the gwc-make started Ok! Next problem is the next compile-error in declick.c (I'm playing with gwc-0.20-10a under GNOME-2.2.0.1). Thank you for your help. Kind regards, bernhard --------------------------------------------------------------------- declick.c: In function `do_declick_fft': declick.c:575: error: `left' undeclared (first use in this function) declick.c:575: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once declick.c:575: error: for each function it appears in.) declick.c:577: error: `right' undeclared (first use in this function) declick.c:586: warning: unused variable `y' declick.c:605: warning: unused variable `click_end' declick.c:536: warning: unused variable `nclicks_not_repaired_start' declick.c:538: warning: unused variable `loop_flag' declick.c:474: warning: unused variable `min_sample' declick.c:474: warning: unused variable `max_sample' declick.c:475: warning: unused variable `sample' declick.c:478: warning: unused variable `n_samples' declick.c:480: warning: unused variable `n_last_pass' declick.c:482: warning: unused variable `n' declick.c:483: warning: unused variable `offset0' declick.c:483: warning: unused variable `offsetF' declick.c:500: warning: unused variable `window_overlap' make: *** [declick.o] Error 1 -- http://www.mb-schiekel.de/ GPG-Key available: GnuPG-1.4.0 |
From: M.B. S. <mb....@ar...> - 2005-04-27 17:40:18
|
Gottfried Necker schrieb: > did you install the libgnome-devel package? Under SuSE and probably some other > distributions, most packages have been split into a standard and a devel > package. There might be some more missing packages. Under recent SuSE > distribution you can use the pin comand to look for the packages which > contain the missing files. Thank you, Gottfried, your question seems to go in the right direction. Well, I did install all the (gwc) requested devel packages from the SuSE-8.2-DVD these days. But a few weeks ago, I made my last SuSE-online update and it seems that this update installed a new gnome file-hierarchy, because I found in /opt/gnome2 a file named REMOVE_IN_PROGRESS: "THIS DIRECTORY IS RENDERED OBSOLETE AND WILL BE REMOVED SOON!!! Filesystem hierarchy was significantly changed in SuSE Linux 9.0 and all GNOME/GTK related programs now reside in /opt/gnome. Please move out this directory, otherwise it will be deleted by SuSEconfig.gnome-filesystem in one week since last change. GNOME themes can be simply moved to /opt/gnome/share/themes, all other programs must be re-installed." So I think, my GNOME installation is broken by these online-updates and I have to find a way to fix it, before I can do other things, like compiling gwc. kind regards, bernhard -- http://www.mb-schiekel.de/ GPG-Key available: GnuPG-1.4.0 |
From: Gottfried N. <Got...@gm...> - 2005-04-25 19:07:53
|
On Monday 25 April 2005 12:03, M.B. Schiekel wrote: > James Tappin schrieb: > >>2. make started the gcc, and the in the first c-file there is a: > >> libgnome/libgnome.h: file or directory not found. > >> > >> This header-file is available on my system in > >> /opt/gnome/include/gnome-1.0/libgnome/libgnome.h > > > > I've not done a gwc build recently, but most configure systems have a > > --with-extra-includes option that can be used to specify > > /opt/gnome/include/gnome-1.0 as an extra directory to search. > > Thank you, James, > > well, I tried a > ./configure --with-extra-includes /opt/gnome/include/gnome-1.0 > didn't work. > > Then I looked in the help of the configure script and tried: > ./configure --includedir=/opt/gnome/include/gnome-1.0 > but this didn't work too. > > kind regards, > bernhard Hi, did you install the libgnome-devel package? Under SuSE and probably some other distributions, most packages have been split into a standard and a devel package. There might be some more missing packages. Under recent SuSE distribution you can use the pin comand to look for the packages which contain the missing files. Kind regards, Gottfried |
From: M.B. S. <mb....@ar...> - 2005-04-25 09:50:59
|
James Tappin schrieb: >>2. make started the gcc, and the in the first c-file there is a: >> libgnome/libgnome.h: file or directory not found. >> >> This header-file is available on my system in >> /opt/gnome/include/gnome-1.0/libgnome/libgnome.h >> > > I've not done a gwc build recently, but most configure systems have a > --with-extra-includes option that can be used to specify > /opt/gnome/include/gnome-1.0 as an extra directory to search. Thank you, James, well, I tried a ./configure --with-extra-includes /opt/gnome/include/gnome-1.0 didn't work. Then I looked in the help of the configure script and tried: ./configure --includedir=/opt/gnome/include/gnome-1.0 but this didn't work too. kind regards, bernhard -- http://www.mb-schiekel.de/ GPG-Key available: GnuPG-1.4.0 |
From: James T. <ja...@ta...> - 2005-04-25 07:38:21
|
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:24:24 +0200 "M.B. Schiekel" <mb....@ar...> wrote: > Hallo, > > here's a newbie question about compiling. I' using a SuSE-8.2 distro > with GNOME-2.2.0.1. > I did an untar of GWC into: /usr/local/updates/gwc/gwc-0.20-10a . > > 1 ./configure was Ok > 2. make started the gcc, and the in the first c-file there is a: > libgnome/libgnome.h: file or directory not found. > > This header-file is available on my system in > /opt/gnome/include/gnome-1.0/libgnome/libgnome.h > I've not done a gwc build recently, but most configure systems have a --with-extra-includes option that can be used to specify /opt/gnome/include/gnome-1.0 as an extra directory to search. James -- James Tappin, O__ "I forget the punishment for using ja...@ta... -- \/` Microsoft --- Something lingering http://www.tappin.me.uk/ with data loss in it I fancy" |
From: M.B. S. <mb....@ar...> - 2005-04-25 07:12:00
|
Hallo, here's a newbie question about compiling. I' using a SuSE-8.2 distro with GNOME-2.2.0.1. I did an untar of GWC into: /usr/local/updates/gwc/gwc-0.20-10a . 1 ./configure was Ok 2. make started the gcc, and the in the first c-file there is a: libgnome/libgnome.h: file or directory not found. This header-file is available on my system in /opt/gnome/include/gnome-1.0/libgnome/libgnome.h How to adapt the Makefile (or the configure), so that the header files are found? Thank you. Kind regards, bernhard ------------------------------------------------------------------------ gcc -DDATADIR=\"/usr/local/share\" -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" -DAPPNAME=\"gnome_wave_cleaner\" -DHAVE_DFFTW -Wall -g -O2 -mcpu=i686 -march=i686 -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/opt/gnome2/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/opt/gnome2/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/opt/gnome2/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/opt/gnome2/include/gconf/2 -I/opt/gnome2/include/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/opt/gnome2/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/opt/gnome2/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/opt/gnome2/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/linc-1.0 -I/opt/gnome2/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -c dialog.c dialog.c:24:31: libgnome/libgnome.h: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden In file included from dialog.c:25: gwc.h:27:19: gnome.h: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden -- http://www.mb-schiekel.de/ GPG-Key available: GnuPG-1.4.0 |
From: Stewart E. <st...@lu...> - 2005-04-19 04:43:22
|
Update on my odd problem. I read somewhere (though, of course, I can no longer find the reference) that this card and/or driver only supported a buffer size of 8192 bytes (which is the fragment size). audio_device_best_buffer_size was returning 24576 (3x fragsize), so I tried changing it to return oss_info.fragsize directly - it worked now! Out of curiousity, I decided to check what happened when it returned 2x fragsize - that worked also. I still don't really know what any of that means...but at least I know a workaround! -- Stewart |
From: Jeff W. <we...@ya...> - 2005-04-16 15:47:29
|
Mike's correct. My apologies for not getting a fix out promptly. I'll post one later today. jw Mike Fleetwood wrote: > > Stewart Evans wrote: > >> ...looks like this could be fixed by a simple forward declaration. > > > Heres the fix: > --- biquad.c.orig 2005-01-17 19:39:26.000000000 +0000 > +++ biquad.c 2005-04-16 14:15:14.431766000 +0100 > @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ > static int filter_type = NOTCH ; > static int feather_width = 20 ; > > +static void load_filter_preferences(void); > + > > void filter_audio(struct sound_prefs *p, long first, long last, int > channel_mask) > { > > Mike |
From: Mike F. <mi...@ro...> - 2005-04-16 14:04:34
|
Stewart Evans wrote: > ...looks like this could be fixed by a simple forward declaration. Heres the fix: --- biquad.c.orig 2005-01-17 19:39:26.000000000 +0000 +++ biquad.c 2005-04-16 14:15:14.431766000 +0100 @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ static int filter_type = NOTCH ; static int feather_width = 20 ; +static void load_filter_preferences(void); + void filter_audio(struct sound_prefs *p, long first, long last, int channel_mask) { Mike -- __ __ _ _ ___ ____ _ ___ ___ _ ___ ___ _ | \/ (_| | _ / _ \ | ___| | / _ \/ _ \| |_ _ _ _/ \/ \ _| | | |\/| | | |/ | ___| | _| | |_| __| ___| __| \/ \/| O | O / _ | |_| |_|_|_|\_\\___| |_| |____\___|\___||____\_/^\_/\___/\___/\___| |
From: Stewart E. <st...@lu...> - 2005-04-13 09:27:30
|
Thanks for the reply, Jeff. I put in debugging to look at the value returned by audio_device_processed_bytes() when called from set_playback_cursor_position(). I get output like this: audio_device_processed_bytes: 16432 play_a_block: bytes_left 1454776 leaving start with audio_playback=1 audio_device_processed_bytes: 22528 audio_device_processed_bytes: 29552 play_a_block: bytes_left 1441656 audio_device_processed_bytes: 31520 audio_device_processed_bytes: 40512 audio_device_processed_bytes: 28864 play_a_block: bytes_left 1442344 audio_device_processed_bytes: 33136 audio_device_processed_bytes: 40960 audio_device_processed_bytes: 40960 play_a_block: bytes_left 1430248 audio_device_processed_bytes: 40960 audio_device_processed_bytes: 40960 audio_device_processed_bytes: 40960 play_a_block: bytes_left 1430248 Curiously, the number that it freezes at is always 40960. What's the magic in 40960, I wonder? It's not even divisible by 42. ;-) Jeff Welty wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry to be late answering, I was on the road all last week. I have > to get my taxes filed in 2 days so I > can't spend any time digging into this right now. As I recall, in the > audio util section, it queries the sound > driver to find out how many bytes it can throw at the playback > device. My first guess is that the playback > device is reporting there is no room in it's buffers, and that's why > gwc is showing the bytes_left staying > constant. > > jw |
From: Stewart E. <st...@lu...> - 2005-04-13 09:00:31
|
Joseph Daly wrote: >Have you tried using OSS instead of ALSA? > >I don't know if it will help but you changed a lot of things at once >so it might narrow down the possibilities. > > Unfortunately, I don't think I can. It's one of those sawing the table leg situations...I changed soundcards because the one I had was junk. The new one is an M-Audio Revolution 7.1, which has a good reputation for quality sound (and so far it seems good to me). However, there's no support in OSS for Envy-based cards, only in ALSA. And trying to install the latest version of ALSA on my ancient RH9 installation was leaving me in dependency hell, so I installed FC3. So everything had to get changed at once and now my tabletop's about three inches off the ground. ;-) -- Stewart |
From: Jeff W. <we...@ya...> - 2005-04-12 23:56:36
|
Hi all, Sorry to be late answering, I was on the road all last week. I have to get my taxes filed in 2 days so I can't spend any time digging into this right now. As I recall, in the audio util section, it queries the sound driver to find out how many bytes it can throw at the playback device. My first guess is that the playback device is reporting there is no room in it's buffers, and that's why gwc is showing the bytes_left staying constant. jw Stewart Evans wrote: > Esben Stien wrote: > >> I would try the alsa-user mailinglist. >> >> >> > Thanks for the suggestion. I've been thinking about it more, though, > and I think it's more related to gwc than I first thought. > > In particular, the playback cursor moves slightly with the burst of > sound, then stops. I placed a debug line right after the calculation > of bytes_left inside the play_a_block function in gwc.c: > > bytes_left = > set_playback_cursor_position(&audio_view, prev_cursor_millisec); > d_print("play_a_block: bytes_left %ld\n", bytes_left) ; /* my > addition */ > > And I get stdout like this: > Current stack limit: 10485760 bytes > press mx:235 my:179 > play_a_block: bytes_left 87224 > leaving start with audio_playback=1 > play_a_block: bytes_left 71528 > play_a_block: bytes_left 72296 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 > ... > > And it'll keep spewing this pretty much as long as I let it. So it > seems like gwc is failing to update the playback cursor position, and > as a result not playing any more audio. I think I need to keep digging... > > -- Stewart > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Gwc-general mailing list > Gwc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general > > > > !DSPAM:425b8048253912151919005! |
From: Joseph D. <jos...@gm...> - 2005-04-12 10:43:18
|
Have you tried using OSS instead of ALSA? I don't know if it will help but you changed a lot of things at once so it might narrow down the possibilities. -- Joseph Daly <jos...@gm...> |
From: Stewart E. <st...@lu...> - 2005-04-12 05:39:39
|
Help isn't working for me either (though I must admit that I didn't try it until just now). In my case, the files were actually installed into /share (for some reason GNOME was blank in the Makefile). But if I move it to /usr/share/gnome/help/ , I still get the same error as you. My best guess is that it has to do with changes in the configure/make process, since there don't seem to be any significant help-related changes between the two versions, but there are some configure changes that that could be a side-effect of. But I don't know either the gwc or gnome code well enough to offer a real answer. -- Stewart John Cirillo wrote: > Hi, > > I've recently installed GWC 0.20.10. So far it's working fine, except > when I click the Help-How to Use, or Help-Quickstart buttons, those > helpfiles can't be found. I have been using GWC 0.20.7 and the help > files worked fine. I've looked in the Makefile, and it shows they will > be installed in /usr/share/gnome/help/gnome_wave_cleaner/C and indeed > they are. The files have the correct names too. I wonder what went > wrong. Does anyone else with GWC 0.20.10 see this? > By the way, when I run gwc from the command line, and click on either of > the above help topics, the error is: > > gnome_help_display failed: Unable to find the help files in either > /usr/local/share/gnome/help/gnome_wave_cleaner/ or > /usr/share/gnome/help/. Please check your installation |
From: Stewart E. <st...@lu...> - 2005-04-12 05:08:44
|
Esben Stien wrote: >I would try the alsa-user mailinglist. > > > Thanks for the suggestion. I've been thinking about it more, though, and I think it's more related to gwc than I first thought. In particular, the playback cursor moves slightly with the burst of sound, then stops. I placed a debug line right after the calculation of bytes_left inside the play_a_block function in gwc.c: bytes_left = set_playback_cursor_position(&audio_view, prev_cursor_millisec); d_print("play_a_block: bytes_left %ld\n", bytes_left) ; /* my addition */ And I get stdout like this: Current stack limit: 10485760 bytes press mx:235 my:179 play_a_block: bytes_left 87224 leaving start with audio_playback=1 play_a_block: bytes_left 71528 play_a_block: bytes_left 72296 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 play_a_block: bytes_left 63080 ... And it'll keep spewing this pretty much as long as I let it. So it seems like gwc is failing to update the playback cursor position, and as a result not playing any more audio. I think I need to keep digging... -- Stewart |