Menu
▾
▴
gwc-general — Gnome Wave Cleaner discussion list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
|
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(15) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(12) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
|
From: John C. <ci...@pu...> - 2003-06-05 01:31:36
|
Hi Jeff,
I decided to try gwc 0.19-3 and see how the new mp3 filesave
works. Everything configured perfectly but shortly into the make,
I got a fatal error caused by what gcc claims is a parsing error
in audio_util.c.
I compared the file to that from 0.19-2 and did find a difference,
at line 432 there used to be an opening brace {
and the corresponding closing brace } after the return, thus:
432 need { here
433 char buf[1000] ;
434 sprintf(buf, "Save %ld bytes to %s", total_bytes,
filename_new) ;
435 if(yesno(buf)) {
436 return ;
437 }
438 need } here
If I add those braces back, the rest of the files build and the
make completes. Here's my diff:
diff audio_util.c audio_util.c.orig
432,433c432
<
< {
---
>
439c438
< }
---
I don't know why this fails, it seems there are the right number
of braces... This is gcc 2.96 from Red Hat 7.3, maybe that makes a
difference.
I tried the new gwc briefly to make sure it ran, then sent this
note in case anyone else has this problem.
John
|
|
From: Tim W. <ti...@th...> - 2003-06-04 23:32:13
|
On 6/4/2003 6:52 PM, someone claiming to be Jeff Welty wrote: > Bill Jetzer improved the click detection speed somewhere around > gwc-17.6, which was late last October. The click detection/repair > algorithms don't use the fftw libs at all... > Then Bill Jetzer should get my heartfelt thanks. And I need to get back to restoring more LPs. I declicked an entire side in hardly any time at all, and the performance impact on my system was negligable. I send a virtual beer to Mr. Jetzer. |
|
From: Jeff W. <we...@ya...> - 2003-06-04 22:49:36
|
Bill Jetzer improved the click detection speed somewhere around gwc-17.6, which was late last October. The click detection/repair algorithms don't use the fftw libs at all... jw Tim Wunder wrote: > Can encoding be turned off when running configure? > > BTW, 0.19 seems faster at declicking than I remember GWC being. What did you > guys do (I'm using fftw 2.1.6, if that matters)? > > On Wednesday 04 June 2003 12:53 am, someone claiming to be Jeff Welty wrote: > >>I suggest you drop back to gwc-0.19-2, it doesn't do the mp3/ogg >>encoding. Charles Morgan has been working on the encoding side of >>things (and doing a great job of it by the way), and it will do the >>encoding directly using the "lame" or "oggenc" programs, so you won't >>have these conflicts. >> >>jw >> >>da...@da... wrote: >> >>>Jeff-- >>> >>>Got rid of the fftw3 libraries, installed fftw2.1.5.... >>> >>>When I tried to configure GWC again, this time it failed with this: >>> >>>Lame libs not found, you will need to get and install: >>>lame-libs and lame-libs-devel (rpms are available >>> >>>I figure I have the same problem as before, but I can't seem to find >>>earlier versions of lame-libs (I have version 1.0.5 installed). >>> >>>Dave >>> >>>Quoting Jeff Welty <we...@ya...>: >>> >>>>Dave, >>>> >>>>The new fftw3 libraries are incompatible with GWC. You need to get and >>>>install the fftw2.1.5 libraries. There is a lot of work to incorporate >>>>the fftw3 libraries, and GWC *should* work just fine with the 2.1.5 libs >>>>-- I say should because I have the 2.1.3 fftw libs myself... >>>> >>>>I plan to incorporate the new fftw3 libs into a future release, but it's >>>>a low priority. >>>> >>>>jw >>>> >>>>da...@da... wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hello-- >>>>>I'm sorta new to Linux, so bear with me here... >>>>> >>>>>I'm looking forward to trying this program, but when I try to run >>>> >>>>Configure, I >>>> >>>> >>>>>get an error message that says: >>>>> >>>>>configure: error: "You need to install the fftw libraries from >>>> >>>>www.fftw.org" >>>> >>>> >>>>>I've already installed this, but keep getting the above error. It must >>>>>be >>>> >>>>that >>>> >>>> >>>>>it doesn't know where to look for them, but then, neither do I! >>>>> >>>>>Any suggestions? >>>>> >>>>>Thanks! >>>>>Dave >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay >>>>>Get office equipment for less on eBay! >>>>>http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 >>>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>>Gwc-general mailing list >>>>>Gwc...@li... >>>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best >>>thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features >>>you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Gwc-general mailing list >>>Gwc...@li... >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best >>thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features >>you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. >>_______________________________________________ >>Gwc-general mailing list >>Gwc...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general > > |
|
From: Tim W. <ti...@th...> - 2003-06-04 12:06:57
|
On 6/4/2003 7:23 AM, someone claiming to be Tim Wunder wrote: > Can encoding be turned off when running configure? > > BTW, 0.19 seems faster at declicking than I remember GWC being. What did you > guys do (I'm using fftw 2.1.6, if that matters)? > um, make that 2.1.3... |
|
From: Tim W. <ti...@th...> - 2003-06-04 11:25:01
|
Can encoding be turned off when running configure? BTW, 0.19 seems faster at declicking than I remember GWC being. What did you guys do (I'm using fftw 2.1.6, if that matters)? On Wednesday 04 June 2003 12:53 am, someone claiming to be Jeff Welty wrote: > I suggest you drop back to gwc-0.19-2, it doesn't do the mp3/ogg > encoding. Charles Morgan has been working on the encoding side of > things (and doing a great job of it by the way), and it will do the > encoding directly using the "lame" or "oggenc" programs, so you won't > have these conflicts. > > jw > > da...@da... wrote: > > Jeff-- > > > > Got rid of the fftw3 libraries, installed fftw2.1.5.... > > > > When I tried to configure GWC again, this time it failed with this: > > > > Lame libs not found, you will need to get and install: > > lame-libs and lame-libs-devel (rpms are available > > > > I figure I have the same problem as before, but I can't seem to find > > earlier versions of lame-libs (I have version 1.0.5 installed). > > > > Dave > > > > Quoting Jeff Welty <we...@ya...>: > >>Dave, > >> > >>The new fftw3 libraries are incompatible with GWC. You need to get and > >>install the fftw2.1.5 libraries. There is a lot of work to incorporate > >>the fftw3 libraries, and GWC *should* work just fine with the 2.1.5 libs > >>-- I say should because I have the 2.1.3 fftw libs myself... > >> > >>I plan to incorporate the new fftw3 libs into a future release, but it's > >>a low priority. > >> > >>jw > >> > >>da...@da... wrote: > >>>Hello-- > >>>I'm sorta new to Linux, so bear with me here... > >>> > >>>I'm looking forward to trying this program, but when I try to run > >> > >>Configure, I > >> > >>>get an error message that says: > >>> > >>>configure: error: "You need to install the fftw libraries from > >> > >>www.fftw.org" > >> > >>>I've already installed this, but keep getting the above error. It must > >>> be > >> > >>that > >> > >>>it doesn't know where to look for them, but then, neither do I! > >>> > >>>Any suggestions? > >>> > >>>Thanks! > >>>Dave > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>------------------------------------------------------- > >>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > >>>Get office equipment for less on eBay! > >>>http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>Gwc-general mailing list > >>>Gwc...@li... > >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best > > thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features > > you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. > > _______________________________________________ > > Gwc-general mailing list > > Gwc...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best > thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features > you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. > _______________________________________________ > Gwc-general mailing list > Gwc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general -- RedHat Psyche 8.0, stock kernel, KDE 3.1.CVS, Xfree86 4.2.1 7:20am up 9 days, 8:30, 4 users, load average: 0.14, 0.26, 0.17 It's what you learn after you know it all that counts |
|
From: Jeff W. <we...@ya...> - 2003-06-04 04:51:01
|
I suggest you drop back to gwc-0.19-2, it doesn't do the mp3/ogg encoding. Charles Morgan has been working on the encoding side of things (and doing a great job of it by the way), and it will do the encoding directly using the "lame" or "oggenc" programs, so you won't have these conflicts. jw da...@da... wrote: > Jeff-- > > Got rid of the fftw3 libraries, installed fftw2.1.5.... > > When I tried to configure GWC again, this time it failed with this: > > Lame libs not found, you will need to get and install: > lame-libs and lame-libs-devel (rpms are available > > I figure I have the same problem as before, but I can't seem to find earlier > versions of lame-libs (I have version 1.0.5 installed). > > Dave > > > Quoting Jeff Welty <we...@ya...>: > > >>Dave, >> >>The new fftw3 libraries are incompatible with GWC. You need to get and >>install the fftw2.1.5 libraries. There is a lot of work to incorporate >>the fftw3 libraries, and GWC *should* work just fine with the 2.1.5 libs >>-- I say should because I have the 2.1.3 fftw libs myself... >> >>I plan to incorporate the new fftw3 libs into a future release, but it's >>a low priority. >> >>jw >> >>da...@da... wrote: >> >>>Hello-- >>>I'm sorta new to Linux, so bear with me here... >>> >>>I'm looking forward to trying this program, but when I try to run >> >>Configure, I >> >>>get an error message that says: >>> >>>configure: error: "You need to install the fftw libraries from >> >>www.fftw.org" >> >>>I've already installed this, but keep getting the above error. It must be >> >>that >> >>>it doesn't know where to look for them, but then, neither do I! >>> >>>Any suggestions? >>> >>>Thanks! >>>Dave >>> >>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay >>>Get office equipment for less on eBay! >>>http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Gwc-general mailing list >>>Gwc...@li... >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general >> >> >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best > thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features > you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. > _______________________________________________ > Gwc-general mailing list > Gwc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general |
|
From: <da...@da...> - 2003-06-04 01:08:15
|
Jeff-- Got rid of the fftw3 libraries, installed fftw2.1.5.... When I tried to configure GWC again, this time it failed with this: Lame libs not found, you will need to get and install: lame-libs and lame-libs-devel (rpms are available I figure I have the same problem as before, but I can't seem to find earlier versions of lame-libs (I have version 1.0.5 installed). Dave Quoting Jeff Welty <we...@ya...>: > Dave, > > The new fftw3 libraries are incompatible with GWC. You need to get and > install the fftw2.1.5 libraries. There is a lot of work to incorporate > the fftw3 libraries, and GWC *should* work just fine with the 2.1.5 libs > -- I say should because I have the 2.1.3 fftw libs myself... > > I plan to incorporate the new fftw3 libs into a future release, but it's > a low priority. > > jw > > da...@da... wrote: > > Hello-- > > I'm sorta new to Linux, so bear with me here... > > > > I'm looking forward to trying this program, but when I try to run > Configure, I > > get an error message that says: > > > > configure: error: "You need to install the fftw libraries from > www.fftw.org" > > > > I've already installed this, but keep getting the above error. It must be > that > > it doesn't know where to look for them, but then, neither do I! > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > Thanks! > > Dave > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > > _______________________________________________ > > Gwc-general mailing list > > Gwc...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general > > > |
|
From: Jeff W. <we...@ya...> - 2003-06-03 04:27:53
|
Dave, The new fftw3 libraries are incompatible with GWC. You need to get and install the fftw2.1.5 libraries. There is a lot of work to incorporate the fftw3 libraries, and GWC *should* work just fine with the 2.1.5 libs -- I say should because I have the 2.1.3 fftw libs myself... I plan to incorporate the new fftw3 libs into a future release, but it's a low priority. jw da...@da... wrote: > Hello-- > I'm sorta new to Linux, so bear with me here... > > I'm looking forward to trying this program, but when I try to run Configure, I > get an error message that says: > > configure: error: "You need to install the fftw libraries from www.fftw.org" > > I've already installed this, but keep getting the above error. It must be that > it doesn't know where to look for them, but then, neither do I! > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks! > Dave > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > Gwc-general mailing list > Gwc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general |
|
From: Jeff W. <we...@ya...> - 2003-05-31 05:11:36
|
1) find out what directory you installed the fftw libs, let's
say it's /usr/local/lib
2) look at your /etc/ld.so.conf file -- does it have "/usr/local/lib"
(or where-ever you installed the fftw libs) as one of the lines? If
not, become root, add the install directory, and issue the command
"ldconfig"
Hope this works. Let me know if it doesn't...
jw
da...@da... wrote:
> Hello--
> I'm sorta new to Linux, so bear with me here...
>
> I'm looking forward to trying this program, but when I try to run Configure, I
> get an error message that says:
>
> configure: error: "You need to install the fftw libraries from www.fftw.org"
>
> I've already installed this, but keep getting the above error. It must be that
> it doesn't know where to look for them, but then, neither do I!
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks!
> Dave
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
> Get office equipment for less on eBay!
> http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
> _______________________________________________
> Gwc-general mailing list
> Gwc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general
|
|
From: <da...@da...> - 2003-05-31 02:51:18
|
Hello-- I'm sorta new to Linux, so bear with me here... I'm looking forward to trying this program, but when I try to run Configure, I get an error message that says: configure: error: "You need to install the fftw libraries from www.fftw.org" I've already installed this, but keep getting the above error. It must be that it doesn't know where to look for them, but then, neither do I! Any suggestions? Thanks! Dave |
|
From: John C. <ci...@pu...> - 2003-03-29 03:35:15
|
Jeff, Thanks. Your clue got me on the path to find the culprit. Turns out -ldb1 is specified in /usr/bin/gnome-config. I removed the instances of that library from the libs list in that file, and the make finished and installed. I have used gwc briefly for about 10 minutes now. It did an amazing job cleaning up a couple of songs from one of my old crackly Bee Gees LPs, and I haven't even begun to figure out how to use it yet! Now I'll go and wring it out a bit, see what it can do. It's great to run into another Boilermaker! The world seems awfully small once you've been associated with Purdue. I have to confess I'm not an alumnus, I am on staff here. It's a great place to work, I might add. Thanks again, John Jeff Welty wrote: > Hey fellow Boilermaker! > > I have a BS in forestry 1982 > An AS in comp sci 1983 > and an MS in forestry 1984 > > All at Purdue. > -- > I don't have time to dig deep, but gwc doesn't directly use that > library. I'm guessing it has something to do with the gnomelibs config > -- gnome uses a lot of other libs. > > I'll see what else I can find when I get home from work later today. > > jw > > John Cirillo wrote: > >> I am very interested in using GWC. I have been using CoolEdit for many >> years and it's the one thing that I have to keep booting into Windows >> to use. >> I'm currently using Red Hat 7.3 on an AMD Duron system. It's a fairly >> mature installation so I'm not sure why I'm having trouble. >> The problem is this: >> I downloaded gwc-0.19-2, ran configure. There's no problem at all. >> Then I run MAKE. I see a problem when it gets to the very end, making >> gwc. It dies with: >> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldb1 >> >> I have tried but cannot determine what it is looking for and where, >> what package provides this. Only thing I can think of is the old >> Berkeley database db1, but that's already installed (db1-1.85.i386.rpm). >> Any help in finding what it wants or a workaround would be >> appreciated. I'm very anxious to try this out. >> >> Thanks! >> John >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: >> The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! >> NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! >> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en >> _______________________________________________ >> Gwc-general mailing list >> Gwc...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general > > > > |
|
From: John C. <ci...@pu...> - 2003-03-28 05:36:40
|
I am very interested in using GWC. I have been using CoolEdit for many years and it's the one thing that I have to keep booting into Windows to use. I'm currently using Red Hat 7.3 on an AMD Duron system. It's a fairly mature installation so I'm not sure why I'm having trouble. The problem is this: I downloaded gwc-0.19-2, ran configure. There's no problem at all. Then I run MAKE. I see a problem when it gets to the very end, making gwc. It dies with: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldb1 I have tried but cannot determine what it is looking for and where, what package provides this. Only thing I can think of is the old Berkeley database db1, but that's already installed (db1-1.85.i386.rpm). Any help in finding what it wants or a workaround would be appreciated. I'm very anxious to try this out. Thanks! John |
|
From: Jeff W. <we...@ya...> - 2003-03-01 05:46:45
|
This is definitely a bug that needs to be fixed. Singular matrices are no fun at all -- I'll think of a work around (a singular matrix means it's unable to repair the click based on the data it was given). I will dig deeper... jw Tim Wunder wrote: > Hi, > I've recently run into a couple scenarios where gwc will close during declick. > So far, it's only happened at the beginning, or the end of a trac. This is > the console output to gdb: > Starting program: /usr/local/bin/gwc > > "solve.c", line 87: singular matrix in function Usolve() > Sorry, too many errors: 100 > Exiting program > > Program exited normally. > > Not a big deal, but thought I'd mention it. > Regards, > Tim > |
|
From: Tim W. <ti...@th...> - 2003-02-27 04:46:54
|
Hi, I've recently run into a couple scenarios where gwc will close during declick. So far, it's only happened at the beginning, or the end of a trac. This is the console output to gdb: Starting program: /usr/local/bin/gwc "solve.c", line 87: singular matrix in function Usolve() Sorry, too many errors: 100 Exiting program Program exited normally. Not a big deal, but thought I'd mention it. Regards, Tim -- RedHat Psyche 8.0, stock kernel, KDE 3.1.CVS, Xfree86 4.2.1 11:40pm up 9 days, 13:37, 4 users, load average: 1.13, 0.62, 0.63 It's what you learn after you know it all that counts |
|
From: Tim W. <ti...@th...> - 2003-02-25 12:29:21
|
There are some interesting discussions on the kde-multimedia list of late. Pertaining to aRts, JACK, Gstreamer, NMM and a bunch of other stuff. If you're interested, http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-multimedia&r=1&b=200302&w=2 Regards, Tim -- RedHat Psyche 8.0, stock kernel, KDE 3.1.CVS, Xfree86 4.2.1 7:15am up 7 days, 21:12, 0 users, load average: 0.32, 0.07, 0.02 It's what you learn after you know it all that counts |
|
From: James T. <ja...@ta...> - 2003-02-24 20:10:15
|
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 22:19:33 -0500 Tim Wunder <ti...@th...> wrote: > Is it better to denoise a track first, then de-click it, or should the > de-clickig be done first? It all depends -- I think it's best to remove the dominant component first. So for 78's it's definitely de-click first while for tapes you would want to denoise first -- for LP's it all depends... James -- James Tappin, O__ "I forget the punishment for using ja...@ta... -- \/` Microsoft --- Something lingering http://www.tappin.me.uk/ with data loss in it I fancy" |
|
From: Jeff W. <we...@ya...> - 2003-02-24 14:26:54
|
Tim Wunder wrote: > > Do you declick the entire track? > > I've gotten into the habit of declicking 7 second intervals (or so) and > progressing thru the track. GWC was typically finding 10-30 clicks, until it > hit a section where there was alot of saxaphone, it'd then find hundreds of > clicks. Much of the time, the end result was worse than the original. Excellent point. I have seen that. It was on a track where the singer's voice was rough, and singing a word with an "ah" sound. I can see a sax having the same problem, especially in the lower notes. I generally don't declick a whole track at once, unless I'm *real sure* that the underlying music is very soft, and smooth. I almost always listen to the track, and declick those portions that I can actually hear the clicks. Part of my strategy involves using headphones that accentuate the treble, so the clicks really stand out. jw |
|
From: Tim W. <ti...@th...> - 2003-02-24 04:23:14
|
Well, you oughta know... I'll try that on the rest of the tracks. I was getting some bad delick results on portions of the first track I worked on, perhaps that had something to do with it. Do you declick the entire track? I've gotten into the habit of declicking 7 second intervals (or so) and progressing thru the track. GWC was typically finding 10-30 clicks, until it hit a section where there was alot of saxaphone, it'd then find hundreds of clicks. Much of the time, the end result was worse than the original. Anybody else see anything like that? On Sunday 23 February 2003 11:02 pm, someone claiming to be Jeff Welty wrote: > This is what I do: > > 1) Find the "noise sample" region > 2) Declick the "noise sample" region > 3) Do your denoising > 4) Finally, declick the track. > > The reason for this, is you don't want the noise sample to include > clicks, which will in a sense corrupt the noise sample, because noise > should be more or less a constant sound, whereas clicks are localized > impulsive sound. > > The alternative would be to declick the whole track first, then denoise > the whole track. I don't have anything other than a hunch, but I am > guessing that because declicking will tend to reduce the "energy" of the > declicked region slightly, that the final result will not be as good as > the method I first suggested. This is worth of a "pepsi taste test", > for those of us who remember what that piece of advertising was all > about :-) > > jw > > Tim Wunder wrote: > > Is it better to denoise a track first, then de-click it, or should the > > de-clickig be done first? > > > > Regards, > > Tim > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. > The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. > Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. > www.slickedit.com/sourceforge > _______________________________________________ > Gwc-general mailing list > Gwc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwc-general |
|
From: Jeff W. <we...@ya...> - 2003-02-24 03:59:41
|
This is what I do: 1) Find the "noise sample" region 2) Declick the "noise sample" region 3) Do your denoising 4) Finally, declick the track. The reason for this, is you don't want the noise sample to include clicks, which will in a sense corrupt the noise sample, because noise should be more or less a constant sound, whereas clicks are localized impulsive sound. The alternative would be to declick the whole track first, then denoise the whole track. I don't have anything other than a hunch, but I am guessing that because declicking will tend to reduce the "energy" of the declicked region slightly, that the final result will not be as good as the method I first suggested. This is worth of a "pepsi taste test", for those of us who remember what that piece of advertising was all about :-) jw Tim Wunder wrote: > Is it better to denoise a track first, then de-click it, or should the > de-clickig be done first? > > Regards, > Tim > |
|
From: Tim W. <ti...@th...> - 2003-02-24 03:19:44
|
Is it better to denoise a track first, then de-click it, or should the de-clickig be done first? Regards, Tim -- RedHat Psyche 8.0, stock kernel, KDE 3.1.CVS, Xfree86 4.2.1 10:15pm up 6 days, 12:12, 2 users, load average: 0.42, 0.48, 0.42 It's what you learn after you know it all that counts |
|
From: Tim W. <ti...@th...> - 2003-02-24 01:06:58
|
Hiya fellow WAV cleaners, Just joined the list... didn't know there was one. Is the list active? Any posting rules (how on/off topic does the list get)? I just downloaded 0.19-1 and it's compiling. Gonna try it out on restoring Traffic's "John Barleycorn Must Die" album. Unfortunately, it looks like I recorded it much too loud, as there seems to be quite alot of clipping on the WAVs I ended up with. What recording software is recommended? I've been using gnome-sound-recorder under RedHat 8.0, which works, provided I have my mixer settings right. Is it better to record at too low of a volume? I never had much luck understanding how to go about normalizing a recording. Anyway, enough rambling, just wanted to make a post to the list and see what happens. Regards, Tim Wunder |
5 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
