Re: [Gtkpod-devel] Upcoming work on libgpod -- opinions wanted

[Christophe F. <te...@gn...>]

> I'd like to wait for some confirmation. It appears strange that it's the =
gcc
> compiler who doesn't seem to be able to cope with the GNU extension...

http://lists.apple.com/archives/Xcode-users/2005/Nov/msg00274.html
confirms it.


> Another possibility would be to reduce the ipod-device code to the bare
> minimum and remove the hole libhal stuff (and adjust the nameing). My
> initial idea was to make it easy to keep libgpod in sync with libipoddevi=
ce,
> but that attempt failed...

Fine with me...

>=20
> If libipoddevice is present, we can of course use that code. I'm just
> wondering if this will be more convenient than keeping the model list
> up-to-date in libgpod as well, which we must do anyway as long as the
> requirements for libipoddevice are so severe.

Any idea if it would be difficult to make libipoddevice hal usage
optional ?

Christophe