From: Francois I. <isa...@sy...> - 2005-12-20 13:02:39
|
Jorg Schuler a écrit : >Hi! > > > >> I just got a 30GB video ipod! >> And I was pleased to see that Apple was kind enough or smart enough to >> keep there product line compatible enough from generation to >> generation, so I was pleased to see this great gtkpod application >> working on this recent model, thanks to all the developpers. >> >> I whish I could join the developpers, but I have not enough spare time >> at the moment... >> >> Anyway I ran into a problem with album artwork support >> My collection has the artwork embedded in the id3tags and iTunes was >> used for an initial import on the iPod, so artwork was displayed. >> >> After I updated my iPod from gtkpod I lost the artwork. >> I'm now able to restore it using gtkpod to "add cover" , >> I'ld like to get this automated, using the embedded artwork images, >> is this possible at this time ? Otherwise, it would be a cool feature >> to add. >> >> > >gtkpod/libgpod should read artwork added by iTunes to the database (ithmb >files). Therefore I do not understand why your artwork got lost when using >gtkpod to first read and then write the iTunesDB. All artwork present before >should still be present afterwards. Can you confirm in more detail what you >did? > >gtkpod does not read artwork stored in file tags. Yes, it would be a nice >feature, but since I don't know how that works, I'll be waiting for a patch >:-) > >Cheers, > > >JCS. > > > Well, first I might have been using 0.94.0-1 (ubuntu) for the initial sync, I don't know if that explains anything, I remember seing and Artwork related message (which I still see on some files (maybe the couple of files I've been adding artwork manually : ) ** (gtkpod:6142): WARNING **: iTunesDB and ArtworkDB artwork sizes inconsistent (125329+2 != 125330) I must say that some 3rdparty windows iPod application lead to same results, at that time I used iTunes check box "display cover atwork" to recover them by unchecking it, apply changes then checking it again(iTunes displayed status information "optimizing artwork" or something like that. So I don't have anymore details, I may try to experiment a bit to see how reproducible it is ... With all the work done on artwork, I guess I may be able to reuse the code to sync artwork using id3tags, gtkpod/libgpod already builds against it anyways... I'll try to evaluate the work required, and see if I can submit some patches .. > > >> By the way video support works fine with the CVS version >> >> > >CVS right now is identical to release 0.99.2 / 0.3.0. > > > > > > It's weird that the build system didn't rerun automake when I synced with CVS ,the "about" box still displayed 0.96 until I manual ran "automake". Well it's ok I guess. Bye Frank >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files >for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes >searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Gtkpod-devel mailing list >Gtk...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkpod-devel > > > |