Menu
▾
▴
gtk2-perl-bugs — Bug reports and mail from bugzilla
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(12) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(105) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(92) |
Dec
(41) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(8) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(40) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-07-11 16:39:52
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704000 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-07-11 16:39:39 UTC --- This happens because "use Gtk2 -init" calls Gtk2->init which calls the C function gtk_init which ends up calling setlocale(). This sets up the environment for locale-specific formatting, among other things. And apparently, the hu_HU locale defines the decimal separator to be a comma. The perl interpreter avoids calling setlocale() by default (unless "use locale" is used), which explains the different formatting when "use Gtk2 -init" is not used. You can call Gtk2->disable_setlocale before Gtk2->init if you do not want setlocale() to be called. But notice that if you want to continue to use the "use Gtk2 -init" shortcut, the Gtk2->disable_setlocale call needs to be in a BEGIN block. So, I don't think this is a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-07-11 12:53:20
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704000 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: Gtk2 -init brokes perl internal locale handling Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: do...@uh... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME version: --- Preamble: Hungarian locale uses a comma instead of a decimal point in fractional numbers. The two oneliner examples below show the bug: doome@freedom:~$ LC_ALL=hu_HU.utf8 perl -e 'print 3.123."\n";' 3.123 doome@freedom:~$ LC_ALL=hu_HU.utf8 perl -e 'use Gtk2 -init; print 3.123."\n";' 3,123 Somehow using Gtk2 -init; mangles (localizes) how Perl fetches a number from the memory, thus all modules trying to access a number got it converted to the locale, even if it shouldn't have. Using pack shows the problem, too, so hopefully it is not in printing or some weird IO Layer of Perl: doome@freedom:~$ LC_ALL=hu_HU.utf8 perl -e 'use Gtk2 -init; print unpack("H*", 3.123)."\n";' 332c313233 doome@freedom:~$ LC_ALL=hu_HU.utf8 perl -e 'print unpack("H*", 3.123)."\n";' 332e313233 This shows the problem lies somewhere deep, because even pack show difference: 2c (an ASCII comma) with Gtk2 -init, and 2e (an ASCII period) without it, so internal stringifying goes wrong.. Tried it on a system with perl-gtk2 1.247, Gtk 2.24 and Perl 5.16, and another one with perl-gtk2 1.220, Gtk2 2.18.9, Perl 5.10.1, both were affected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-05-14 08:59:57
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700275 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: [PATCH] gperl.h:411:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes] Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: an...@mi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME version: --- This fixes a warning generated by the installed header file under gcc -Wstrict-prototypes. (The (void) is needed to distinguish a function that takes no arguments from an old-style variadic function.) --- a/gperl.h +++ b/gperl.h @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ typedef struct { void *priv; } GPerlArgv; -GPerlArgv * gperl_argv_new (); +GPerlArgv * gperl_argv_new (void); void gperl_argv_update (GPerlArgv *pargv); void gperl_argv_free (GPerlArgv *pargv); -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-03-03 23:45:11
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690464 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #7 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2013-03-03 23:25:20 UTC --- > I took a look at Test::ConsistentVersion... it works, but I had to turn most of > the functionality off... We don't put the version in the README file, we no > longer use Changelog, and the VERSION block is in none of our POD pages > currently. Yes, I don't put a version in readme or the pod parts of my stuff either. > It does however check all of the static *.pm files, so it has some > usefulness. Yes, that's it's best thing. I think I had trouble at one time with some .pm files which only loaded with dependent modules. That probably doesn't apply to glib. If it's an author-only test you don't rely on what the final user has available anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-28 07:32:48
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690464 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #6 from Brian Manning <cp...@xa...> 2013-02-28 07:24:02 UTC --- Also pushed to private github repo if you want to pull the change from there: https://github.com/cpanxaoc/perl-Glib.git -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-28 07:22:56
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690464 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #4 from Brian Manning <cp...@xa...> 2013-02-28 07:14:19 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=237580) --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=237580) Test module containing tests that use Test::ConsistentVersions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-28 07:22:48
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690464 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Brian Manning <cpan> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cp...@xa... --- Comment #5 from Brian Manning <cp...@xa...> 2013-02-28 07:14:56 UTC --- I took a look at Test::ConsistentVersion... it works, but I had to turn most of the functionality off... We don't put the version in the README file, we no longer use Changelog, and the VERSION block is in none of our POD pages currently. It does however check all of the static *.pm files, so it has some usefulness. Here's a quick test that includes Test::ConsistentVersion, please try to run 'make test' both before and after installing Test::ConsistentVersion, in order to verify it works with a clean system and one that has that test module installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-28 01:01:42
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690461 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #2 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2013-02-28 01:00:15 UTC --- Perhaps Glib::Object::Base::New to suggest its purpose. I don't see much either "Base" or "Mixin" on cpan. Where does all the multi-inheritence hide? Or is no-one foolish enough to try it? :-) "Roles" are to declare that you have certain features or methods, rather than actually implementing them, are they? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-17 23:53:17
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694051 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: GdkPixbuf new_from_data() length check Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=236511) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=236511 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=694051&attachment=236511 patch and test This is my idea from a while ago to check that gdk_pixbuf_new_from_data() has the data string long enough for the given width,height,rowstride, so that dodgy inputs don't cause a segv for going past the end of the data string. There's no string length passed to gdk, it's the caller's responsibility to ensure the data block is big enough. The aim here would be to stop dubious values at the perl level from crashing the interpreter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-17 20:16:34
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690464 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #3 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2013-02-17 20:16:18 UTC --- For that module-authors thread I think I'm in the same-version-throughout-the-dist camp :). Too hard to remember to increment per-file versions at sensible times, and hard for a user to find what number to depend on if there's only a single Changes file. For tests I've tended to put an explicit "my $want_version = 1.234" in each .t file which exercises a module and its version number. Which is even more work to update for a dist, though emacs search-and-replace makes it easy enough. Testing everything else against Glib->VERSION() may be enough. I'll see if I can do something like that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-17 20:10:13
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604861 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #3 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2013-02-17 20:10:01 UTC --- Are you sure about sv_2mortal() in this context? How far away is a FREETMPS (or whatever it is that normally cleans up)? Perhaps an explicit SvREFCNT_dec() when finished. A SIG{__WARN__} handler could still take its own reference to the sv if it wanted, I imagine. Might be worth exercising such a ref in the tests either way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-17 11:55:08
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604861 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #2 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-02-17 11:54:57 UTC --- Messing with PL_mess_sv seems dangerous, so how about this patch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-17 11:54:21
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604861 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaf...@gm... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-17 11:54:20
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604861 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-02-17 11:54:09 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=236444) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=236444 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=604861&attachment=236444 Ensure that Glib::Log messages are marked as UTF-8-encoded -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-17 11:15:31
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690464 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #2 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-02-17 11:15:20 UTC --- Brian writes that he's OK with this change. So let's do it. Kevin, can you come up with a patch, preferably including a unit test that does something like the following? ok ($Glib::VERSION == $Glib::CodeGen::VERSION == ...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-16 20:46:01
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690464 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaf...@gm... --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-02-16 20:45:47 UTC --- The work required for a release really is the problem here, I think. Brian, you've been doing the releases lately, so what do you think? Coincidentally, there's been discussion about this problem recently on the module-authors list: <http://markmail.org/thread/426ayvgqem3joe5s>. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-16 20:39:36
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690461 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaf...@gm..., | |sc...@as... --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-02-16 20:39:22 UTC --- Make sense to me, and my testing doesn't reveal any compatibility issues. muppet, what do you think? I'm not completely sold on the name "Glib::Object::New". I wouldn't have guessed that it provides a default constructor. I can't think of a better alternative right now, though. Nowadays, modules of this kind seem to be called roles or mixins, but there appears no clear naming convention for them yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-09 11:50:50
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693473 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified intrigeri <intrigeri> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |int...@bo... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-02-09 11:50:14
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693473 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: Tests missing in MANIFEST and released tarball. Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: int...@bo... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME version: --- Hi! While packaging 1.247 for Debian, I noticed that commit bfa63e3df moved some tests to new files, that were not added to MANIFEST, so they don't end up in the released tarball. Looks trivial to fix. Thanks for these bindings! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-01-19 10:48:35
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692043 gnome-perl | general | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-01-19 10:48:22 UTC --- This has already been reported and fixed. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685865 http://git.gnome.org/browse/perl-Gtk2/commit/?id=f7be199c11060d91260570666301e4d5557f7b7d *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 685865 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-01-19 10:48:33
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685865 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ge...@hu... --- Comment #3 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-01-19 10:48:22 UTC --- *** Bug 692043 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-01-18 23:17:20
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692043 gnome-perl | general | unspecified Summary: test failure Gtk2 Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: general AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: ge...@hu... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME version: --- t/GtkRecentChooser.t ............... 1/15 *** unhandled exception in callback: *** No item for URI 'file:///home/root/.cpan/build/Gtk2-1.246-ulZd30/t/GtkRecentChooser.t' found at t/GtkRecentChooser.t line 58. *** ignoring at /home/root/.cpan/build/Gtk2-1.246-ulZd30/blib/lib/Gtk2/TestHelper.pm line 84. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-01-06 19:47:35
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690462 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-01-06 19:47:18 UTC --- Applied, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-01-06 19:47:35
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690462 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #231847|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-01-03 23:23:22
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690459 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-01-03 23:23:03 UTC --- Patch committed (after some reformatting of the commit message), thanks. In a previous commit, I think I fixed the underlying problem of Glib::Type->register_object's order dependence. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
13 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
