You can subscribe to this list here.
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(6) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(12) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(4) |
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(105) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(3) |
2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(7) |
2008 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
2009 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(11) |
2010 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(92) |
Dec
(41) |
2011 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(15) |
2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2013 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(11) |
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
2016 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(8) |
2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(8) |
2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(4) |
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(40) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2004-06-28 22:37:16
|
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145110 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | Ver: unspecified Summary: Documentation suggestion for Gtk2::TreeView - path strings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: dan...@ma... Path strings (as used by Gtk2::TreePath) are not explained in the perl documentation for gtk2. Here's my notes; the first paragraph is mostly cribbed from the Ruby docs, IIRC. The second paragraph was written by me, and is hopefully true. :) Path strings are expected to be a colon separated list of numbers. For example, the string "10:4:0" would create a path of depth 3 pointing to the 11th child of the root node, the 5th child of that 11th child, and the 1st child of that 5th child. If an invalid path string is passed in, an error results. Usually, in a TreeView, you should be looking at depth 1 or 2 path strings. If your TreeView consists of a single column, then the path string for the cell in the first row is "0", the second row is "1", and so on. A multi-column (but still an ordinary, two-dimensional) TreeView would have "0:0" as the cell in the upper, left-hand corner, "0:1" for the cell to its right, and "1:0" for the cell below it. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2004-06-28 22:27:08
|
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145109 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | Ver: unspecified Summary: Documentation suggestion for Gtk2::TreeView Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: dan...@ma... In the original .pod for Gtk2::TreeView, we have: (path, column, cell_x, cell_y) = $tree_view->get_path_at_pos ($x, $y) * $x (integer) * $y (integer) In scalar context, returns the Gtk2::TreePath, in array context, adds the Gtk2::TreeViewColumn, and $x and $y translated to be relative to the cell. I believe that $x and $y are pixel coordinates. This should be made more clear. Possibly I am wrong, in which case, the truth should still be made more clear. :) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. |