You can subscribe to this list here.
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(6) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(12) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(4) |
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(105) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(3) |
2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(7) |
2008 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
2009 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(11) |
2010 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(92) |
Dec
(41) |
2011 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(15) |
2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2013 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(11) |
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
2016 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(8) |
2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(8) |
2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(4) |
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(40) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-07-02 15:33:44
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732628 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tca...@re... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-07-02 14:38:22
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732628 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: gtk colored buttons Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: ad...@mi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME version: --- perl-gtk2 applications that set the background color for buttons aren't producing colored output. Note: this bug was originally filed under perl-Gtk2-1.247-1.fc18.x86_64, but is also relevant with perl-Gtk2-1.247-1.fc19.x86_64. How reproducible: Create a trivial perl-gtk application with a coloured button. Steps to Reproduce: 1. see below for code example to run Actual results: Button is created, but no colour. Expected results: Coloured button. (Red.) Additional info: Note: this worked as expected in Fedora 17. (perl-Gtk2-1.241-2.fc17.i686) Sample colored button code: #!/bin/perl use Gtk2 qw/-init/; my $window = Gtk2::Window->new; $window->set_title("Window!"); my $button = Gtk2::Button->new("Coloured _button"); # does not affect text $button->modify_bg(normal => Gtk2::Gdk::Color->new(0xffff, 0, 0)); $window->add($button); $window->show_all; Gtk2->main; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-06-11 10:51:57
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731488 gnome-perl | general | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |INCOMPLETE --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2014-06-11 10:51:41 UTC --- You need to be more specific than that. Please demonstrate (with console output, a short example program, or similar) what is crashing and how. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-06-10 23:15:56
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731488 gnome-perl | general | unspecified Summary: teste Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: general AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: mor...@gm... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME version: --- Weird crashes with Gnome 2.18, possibly bindings-related. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-05-30 10:36:56
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727085 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #3 from intrigeri <int...@bo...> 2014-05-30 10:36:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Let us know if that still doesn't fix your builds. Thank you! I've just cherry-picked this commit, and uploaded to Debian as 1.2491-3. I'll let you know how it goes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-05-29 21:04:55
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727085 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2014-05-29 21:04:40 UTC --- There have been many reports in the past of this test causing spurious failures, so I've now simply disabled it: https://git.gnome.org/browse/perl-Gtk2/commit/?id=e5a2004f41c82efb31e7823a9c44f29180d52be2 Let us know if that still doesn't fix your builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-05-17 20:52:37
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729453 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Dominique Dumont <domi.dumont> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dom...@fr... --- Comment #1 from Dominique Dumont <dom...@fr...> 2014-05-17 20:52:20 UTC --- Note that the failing test is: is_deeply ([ sort keys %hits ], [ qw/edit init render size/ ], 'callbacks encountered'); The following similar line succeeds: is_deeply ([ sort keys %hits_compat ], [ qw/edit init render size/ ], 'callbacks encountered'); The second line performs callback test in compat mode (quoting the comment in the test: "in the style of 1.02x") which succeeds. The first line test callback in newer mode and fails. This looks like a regression. HTH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-05-03 11:18:17
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729453 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: t/GtkCellRenderer.t sometimes fails on armhf, mips and mipsel architectures Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: int...@bo... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME version: --- Hi, since April 2010 (1.1.221), libgtk2-perl sometimes fails to build from source in Debian, on the armhf, mips and mipsel architectures, due to a failing test (t/GtkCellRenderer.t). I did not find any similar failure on other architectures. This is tracked in Debian as https://bugs.debian.org/746761. Any idea what could be wrong? Build logs on mips: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgtk2-perl&arch=mips&ver=2:1.249-1&stamp=1389205083 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgtk2-perl&arch=mips&ver=2:1.249-2&stamp=1395691192 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgtk2-perl&arch=mips&ver=1:1.230-1&stamp=1278406057 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgtk2-perl&arch=mips&ver=1:1.230-1&stamp=1278278634 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgtk2-perl&arch=mips&ver=1:1.221-6&stamp=1271111575 Build logs on mipsel: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgtk2-perl&arch=mipsel&ver=2:1.247-2+b1&stamp=1378112269 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgtk2-perl&arch=mipsel&ver=2:1.242-1&stamp=1327181795 Build logs on armhf: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgtk2-perl&arch=armhf&ver=2:1.247-1&stamp=1360945938 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-03-26 12:31:58
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727085 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #1 from intrigeri <int...@bo...> 2014-03-26 12:31:40 UTC --- FTR, this is tracked as https://bugs.debian.org/742687 in Debian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-03-26 12:18:03
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727085 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: t/GtkSocket-GtkPlug.t sometimes times out on Debian/kFreeBSD Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: int...@bo... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME version: --- Hi, since early 2012 (1.242), the libgtk2-perl package build on Debian/kFreeBSD (both 32-bit and 64-bit) sometimes fails. The end of the failed build log always is: t/GtkSimpleMenu.t .................. ok t/GtkSizeGroup.t ................... ok Xlib: extension "RANDR" missing on display ":99". Xlib: extension "RANDR" missing on display ":99". E: Caught signal ‘Terminated’: terminating immediately make: *** [build-arch] Terminated make[2]: *** [test_dynamic] Terminated make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Terminated Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity ... so I'm inclined to believe that t/GtkSocket-GtkPlug.t sometimes times out. Any idea what could trigger this? Note that this never happens with our Linux architectures. Full build logs can be found there: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libgtk2-perl&arch=kfreebsd-i386 I'll forward this to the Debian kFreeBSD porters, in case they have an idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-03-24 19:36:19
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725055 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #272765|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-03-24 19:36:10
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725055 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2014-03-24 19:36:01 UTC --- Thanks a lot for tracking this down. Patch committed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-03-24 12:02:03
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725055 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #4 from Colin Watson <cjw...@de...> 2014-03-24 12:01:50 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=272765) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=272765 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=725055&attachment=272765 t/GdkPixbufLoader.t: Use a bigger file to test chunking -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-03-24 12:01:38
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725055 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #3 from Colin Watson <cjw...@de...> 2014-03-24 12:01:24 UTC --- OK, so the problem now is that gtk-demo/gnome-foot.png is less than the new buffer size, so the loader doesn't trigger any signals until forced to by closing the file. We can work around this by simply using a bigger test file. Patch attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-03-24 11:51:44
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725055 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Colin Watson <cjwatson> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cjw...@de... --- Comment #2 from Colin Watson <cjw...@de...> 2014-03-24 11:51:32 UTC --- I bisected this to this gdk-pixbuf change: commit 0352f8589831a7f76f3c66db643c4bf920422110 Author: Matthias Clasen <mc...@re...> Date: Tue Dec 17 08:51:09 2013 -0500 Unify sniff buffer size GdkPixbufLoader was using 1k as a buffer size for sniffing file types, and the gdk_pixbuf_new_from_file() family of functions was using 4k, for no good reason. Unify this so we use the same buffer size everywhere. :040000 040000 2060af0428f68667cbe9a90db8f173479149c9a7 eec9ecaf91ef4305dcb48a3486b395e5d5257053 M gdk-pixbuf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-03-22 10:55:41
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725055 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #1 from intrigeri <int...@bo...> 2014-03-22 10:55:30 UTC --- FTR, I can still reproduce this on current Debian unstable. Any information I could provide to help fix this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-02-24 11:26:09
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725055 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified intrigeri <intrigeri> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |int...@bo... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-02-24 11:24:23
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725055 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: t/GdkPixbufLoader.t fails test 'got some area-updated signals' with recent gdk-pixbuf Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: int...@bo... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME version: --- On current Debian unstable, t/GdkPixbufLoader.t fails test 'got some area-updated signals', as reported on https://bugs.debian.org/739809. It does not fail (yet) on current Debian testing. Both distributions have the same version of libgtk2, but testing has gdk-pixbuf 2.28.2, while unstable has 2.30.5. I suspect the gdk-pixbuf update is the cause of the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2014-02-20 23:08:16
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724840 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: Cannot get dependencies installed Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: hak...@li... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME version: --- I am in the process of installing GTK+ but it needs various pre-requisites. These are glib - 2.0 >= 2.35.3 atk - >= 2.7.5 Pango- >= 1.32.4 gdk-pixbuf-2.0 >= 2.27.1 Now I upgraded my glib-2.0 to 2.38.2, and I've tried upgrading atk, pango and gdk-pixbuf checking for GLIB - version >= 2.31.2... 'pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.38.2, but GLIB (2.32.4) was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it is best to remove the old version of GLib. You may also be able to fix the error by modifying your LD_LIBRARY_PATH enviroment variable, or by editing /etc/ld.so.conf. Make sure you have run ldconfig if that is required on your system. If pkg-config was wrong, set the environment variable PKG_CONFIG_PATH to point to the correct configuration files configure: error: GLIB 2.31.2 or better is required. The latest version of GLIB is always available from ftp://ftp.gtk.org/. If GLIB is installed but not in the same location as pkg-config add the location of the file glib-2.0.pc to the environment variable PKG_CONFIG_PATH. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-12-20 17:50:27
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720784 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-12-20 17:50:00 UTC --- Should be fixed in git: <https://git.gnome.org/browse/perl-Glib/commit/?id=4e85501a3b03c4636dc1d9529bcacdffcbfadf2c>. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-12-19 23:02:00
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720784 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: Build failure on travis-ci Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: the...@gm... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME version: --- Hello! It seems that the latest version of Glib (1.303) fails to build on travis-ci: [ CC gperl-gtypes.c ] gperl-gtypes.c: In function ‘gperl_spawn_flags_get_type’: gperl-gtypes.c:190:9: error: ‘G_SPAWN_SEARCH_PATH_FROM_ENVP’ undeclared (first use in this function) gperl-gtypes.c:190:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in make: *** [gperl-gtypes.o] Error 1 FAIL (Full build log can be found here: https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/15736507/log.txt ) Switching to previous stable version Glib (1.302) causes not that a problem. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-12-08 18:27:55
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710417 gnome-perl | general | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-12-08 18:27:42 UTC --- Committed. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-12-08 18:27:55
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710417 gnome-perl | general | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #257592|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-12-08 17:40:27
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710403 gnome-perl | general | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-12-08 17:40:12 UTC --- Should be fixed in 1.044. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2013-12-08 17:31:12
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=711839 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaf...@gm... --- Comment #2 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2013-12-08 17:31:00 UTC --- The patch looks good to me (apart from some minor spaces-vs-tabs issues), but it needs some unit tests. Also, as far as I can see, this would suffer from the same kinds of problems that the Glib::Idle approach has when used by Perl code running in different threads: If you call $context->invoke() from some thread on a context not attached to that thread, then gperl_main_context_invoke_callback() will access SV* pointers from the calling thread in the context's thread, i.e. it will try to use SV* pointers belonging to one Perl interpreter instance with another Perl interpreter instance. This is unreliable. This is not an argument against the patch, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |