Menu
▾
▴
gtk2-perl-bugs — Bug reports and mail from bugzilla
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(12) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(105) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(92) |
Dec
(41) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(8) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(40) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-28 23:30:13
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633413 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: Doc Object find_property return undef Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=173449) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=173449 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=633413&attachment=173449 doc patch A couple of words to make clear find_property() can return undef. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-28 23:15:18
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633410 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: doc MenuItem new is new_with_mnemonic Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=173445) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=173445 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=633410&attachment=173445 doc patch I didn't for a while realize Gtk2::MenuItem new() is new_with_mnemonic() rather than new_with_label(). Perhaps the could of words attached. (A perl-wrapper thing, unrelated to the C code interfaces of course.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-17 23:28:42
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632413 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: GdkCairo docs Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=172572) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=172572 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=632413&attachment=172572 doc patch Are the Gtk2::Gdk::Cairo::Context methods meant to be used with all kinds of Cairo::Context objects too? Is that in fact the usual way to draw from a pixbuf or pixmap onto a printer (Gtk2::PrintOperation stuff) etc? Perhaps a bit for the docs as attached. The args listed for ->rectangle come out in reverse order with current GenPod.pm, but I think that might be down to it rather than the pod. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-16 00:47:12
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632270 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: gtk_aspect_frame_new() allows NULL for no label Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=172473) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=172473 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=632270&attachment=172473 patch and test case I think gtk_aspect_frame_new() allows NULL/undef to make a frame with no label, per attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-13 09:48:35
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632040 gnome-perl | Cairo | unspecified Summary: perl-Cairo test suite fails with cairo 1.10 Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Cairo AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: vu...@gn... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Apparently, distros need to work around the issue with patches like this one: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/56312946/libcairo-perl_1.070-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-21 00:20:52
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629727 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #3 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-09-21 00:20:38 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=170727) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=170727 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=629727&attachment=170727 tests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-21 00:19:57
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629727 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #2 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-09-21 00:19:44 UTC --- As a boolean it's unchanged (new .t diff attached), if that helps. It seems unlikely that getting back a non-cell from get_cells could do anyone much good. My guess would be that nobody has done an empty get_cells before now and that returning undef instead of empty may be rated a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-21 00:05:04
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628748 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Kevin Ryde <user42> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED Resolution|FIXED |INCOMPLETE --- Comment #2 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-09-21 00:04:49 UTC --- I see I did something wrong to the apidoc bit =for apidoc Gtk2::Container::list_child_properties which doesn't come out in final pod. What should it look like for one of these dual ALIAS func thingies? (I thought I copied what GObject.xs had ...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-19 16:58:15
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629227 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #169910|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-19 16:58:08
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629227 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-09-19 16:57:58 UTC --- Works perfectly. Committed. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-19 16:56:38
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628748 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #169460|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-19 16:56:38
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628748 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-09-19 16:56:23 UTC --- Terrific patch! Committed. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-19 16:24:22
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629723 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #170304|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-19 16:24:16
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629723 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-09-19 16:24:04 UTC --- Committed: <http://git.gnome.org/browse/perl-Gtk2/commit/?id=58aeee94c3969466c60a2cdefae114634e451e0b>. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-19 16:23:45
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622323 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #164251|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-19 16:23:33
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622323 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-09-19 16:23:22 UTC --- Committed: <http://git.gnome.org/browse/perl-Gtk2/commit/?id=3b9f004e9e0856cc513d967cdb72d03bc3414464>. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-19 16:05:55
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629727 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |kaf...@gm... Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-09-19 16:05:43 UTC --- I agree that (undef) for no cells is definitely very inconvenient, and your patch corrects that. (And git puts the blame on me. :-/) But I worry about backwards compatibility. Is it conceivable that someone somewhere relies on (undef) signaling "no cells"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-19 00:57:40
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630031 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-09-19 00:57:26 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=170573) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=170573 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=630031&attachment=170573 Correctly store and look up custom signal marshallers Rather than storing (signal name => (marshaller, instance type)) associations, use (instance type => (signal name => marshaller)). This ensures that we handle signal names occurring more than once in the object hierarchy. For example, Gtk2::Dialog and Gtk2::InfoBar both have a "response" signal (for which we want to install custom signal marshallers). This implies that the look up implementation used during signal connection needs to walk the ancestry and the interfaces of the instance's type in the search for custom signal marshallers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-19 00:56:34
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630031 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: Handle custom marshallers for signals from different type but with the same name Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: kaf...@gm... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Gtk2::Dialog's and Gtk2::InfoBar's "response" signal demonstrates this. Here's a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-15 00:23:01
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629727 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: CellLayout get_cells() empty list not undef Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=170309) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=170309 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=629727&attachment=170309 patch and test case When a CellLayout interfaced widget has no renderers I think get_cells() should return an empty list, not an undef. An undef return is rather inconvenient if doing a foreach ($viewer->get_cells). Perhaps per attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-14 23:28:21
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629723 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: ComboBox set_model() allow NULL Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=170304) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=170304 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=629723&attachment=170304 patch and test case ComboBox set_model() accepts NULL for no model in gtk 2.6, perhaps per attached. I'm not sure whether to restrict the _ornull to 2.6 up. It looks like it only provokes an g_assert() in 2.4 so wouldn't matter too much if it was made right for 2.6 and worry later about the previous. I tried a #if with and without _ornull but it doubled up in the generated pod. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-14 23:14:11
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629720 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: Action and create menu/tool items Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- It'd be good if Gtk2::Action subclasses could implement the GtkActionClass class functions create_menu_item() and create_tool_item(). Those functions allow an arbitrary class for the menu item or tool item. For example GtkRecentAction uses them to make a GtkMenuToolButton instead of a plain GtkToolButton. Those class functions don't appear in the GtkAction docs, but seem to be the way to get the desired effect. Being non-signal class functions means all the usual gtk-perl trouble with how to call to a superclass. Initially it could be enough to have no chaining. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-09 23:07:54
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629227 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: GenPod show child properties Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=169910) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=169910 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=629227&attachment=169910 patch This is a couple of lines to show a "CHILD PROPERTIES" section in the pod of container classes like Gtk2::Table. It uses $class->list_child_properties() of bug 628748. Until that's added it does nothing, since in any class without a list_child_properties() it does nothing. I think this can pick up Goo::Canvas::Item child properties too, if/when goo_canvas_item_class_list_child_properties() is wrapped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-09 22:55:01
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629226 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: Region spans_intersect_foreach() docs Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=169909) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=169909 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=629226&attachment=169909 doc patch I was unsure quite what $region->spans_intersect_foreach() took and its callback args. Perhaps the few words attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-07 00:25:37
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616655 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #3 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-09-07 00:25:25 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=169635) --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=169635) loop program which doesn't leak memory, but does provoke the _noinc problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
13 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
