Menu
▾
▴
gtk2-perl-bugs — Bug reports and mail from bugzilla
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(12) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(105) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(92) |
Dec
(41) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(8) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(40) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-08 22:43:30
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633410 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-11-08 22:43:16 UTC --- Committed, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-08 22:43:30
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633410 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #173445|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-08 20:05:32
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634349 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Kevin Ryde <user42> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-08 20:01:09
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570793 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Kevin Ryde <user42> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |us...@zi... --- Comment #1 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-11-08 20:00:54 UTC --- Adding this could make it implementable now, if a class also made its own properties=>[Glib::ParamSpec->boolean('orientation')] Not sure that's to be recommended though, if the glib interface stuff is going to automatically create the interface properties later on. Depends perhaps what the glib stuff is going to do if it finds the property in question already exists. You'd be inclined to make it an error/warning/log/whatever, but I suppose it could quietly assume the subclass knew what it was doing and omit interface properties already in the subclass (and not in a superclass). Would that be a bit painful? One thing it might allow though is the pspec=>,get=>,set=> style property creation dispatching to individual handler funcs instead of GET_PROPERTY/SET_PROPERTY. properties => [ { pspec => Glib::ParamSpec->override ('orientation', Gtk2::Orientable->find_property('orientation')), get => \&_my_orient_get, set => \&_my_orient_set, } ] Bit tedious to write as well as to implement maybe :-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-08 19:45:53
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570792 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-11-08 19:45:42 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=174092) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=174092 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=570792&attachment=174092 patch installing properties, but they don't reach GET_PROPERTY/SET_PROPERTY I think saying "interfaces => [ ... ]" could automatically add the interface properties. If you're implementing an interface then that'll be usually what you want. Worry about subtle variations later. I wondered if it was as easy as the gobject manual suggested and you just had to g_object_class_override_property() each of the g_object_interface_list_properties(). I even threw down the attached few lines to that end. However, The pspec which reaches gperl_type_get_property() is the underlying one out of the interface, and its pspec->owner_type is the interface, not the class implementing the interface. This means gperl_type_get_property() doesn't go to the class' GET_PROPERTY. The way g_object_get_property() looks through an override to the underlying can be seen in object_get_property() of gobject.c. I suppose someone thought that was a good idea. I suspect this is another case of the C code being oriented towards individual class funcs such as class->get_property implicitly knowing which class they're for, rather than a generic like gperl_type_get_property(). Perhaps the property_id number could encode something to identify the actual target class. Normally those ids are consecutive 1 to N, but I get the impression it's an arbitrary integer for use by the class in question. Second, I see g_object_class_override_property() looks first in parent classes and then in interfaces for a property of the given name. If a subclass has an interface with an interface property with the same name as a superclass property then g_object_class_override_property() might end up taking the superclass one as the target, not the interface. I suppose that affects C code as well. Unless the gobject manual has something better to say I suspect an explicit pspec = g_param_spec_override (name, iface_pspec); g_object_class_install_property (oclass, property_id, pspec); might be necessary to ensure it's the interface one which is installed. This sort of thing might come up if a subclass re-implements an interface already implemented in a superclass. That's fairly common of course if a subclass wants to do things slightly differently. Eg. I've made various subclasses redoing TreeDragSource to have different answers about draggability. Whether there's any like that with interface properties would be another matter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-08 19:14:07
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634350 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: Object properties pspec/get/set form vs subclass Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=174088) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=174088 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=634350&attachment=174088 patch and test cases If a class adds a property with properties => [ { pspec=>, get=>, set=> } ] then those get/set funcs are not called from a further subclass of that class. I think the lookup for those get/set funcs should be on the pspec->owner_type, not the instance type. The instance type is the subclass, whereas the owner type is one which defined the property and where the get/set are stored -- per attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-08 19:03:07
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634349 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: ParamSpec get_default_value() for override and gtype Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=174087) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=174087 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=634349&attachment=174087 patch and test cases This is a get_default_value() method for the new Glib::Param::Override and Glib::Param::GType, using g_param_value_set_default(). It's done slightly with an eye to replacing the specific get_default_value() methods of the various param types, per other ticket, but to start with it gets override and gtype going. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-31 05:34:04
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626902 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #4 from sis...@op... 2010-10-31 05:33:50 UTC --- I eventually added the pre-requisite libraries to my Cygwin installation so that I could build, test and install Glib-1.223 (including the GType.xs patch). All went fine - all tests passed !! (That was perl 5.10.1 and gcc-4.3.4, btw.) Cheers, Rob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-31 02:51:48
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626902 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #3 from sis...@op... 2010-10-31 02:51:36 UTC --- The patch works fine for me. I'm not set up to test Cygwin, but I've tested with: 1) gcc-3.4.5 (x86), perl 5.8.9 2) gcc-4.6.0 (x64), perl 5.12.2 3) MSVC++ 7.0 (x86), perl 5.10.0 My x64 Microsoft compiler (Microsoft Platform SDK for Windows Server 2003 R2) won't build glib because of some issue with the glib headers: C:/Gtk+_64\include\glib-2.0\glib\gmessages.h(140) : error C2010: '.' : unexpected in macro formal parameter list C:/Gtk+_64\include\glib-2.0\glib\gmessages.h(140) : error C2010: '.' : unexpected in macro formal parameter list C:/Gtk+_64\include\glib-2.0\glib\gmessages.h(140) : error C2010: '.' : unexpected in macro formal parameter list C:/Gtk+_64\include\glib-2.0\glib\gmessages.h(147) : error C2010: '.' : unexpected in macro formal parameter list C:/Gtk+_64\include\glib-2.0\glib\gmessages.h(147) : error C2010: '.' : unexpected in macro formal parameter list C:/Gtk+_64\include\glib-2.0\glib\gmessages.h(147) : error C2010: '.' : unexpected in macro formal parameter list [snip - more similar] The offending section of the header is: 140: #define g_error(...) G_STMT_START { \ 141: g_log (G_LOG_DOMAIN, \ 142: G_LOG_LEVEL_ERROR, \ 143: __VA_ARGS__); \ 144: for (;;) ; \ 145: } G_STMT_END 146: 147: #define g_message(...) g_log (G_LOG_DOMAIN, \ 148: G_LOG_LEVEL_MESSAGE, \ MSVC++ 7.0 has no problem with the same syntax, so I don't know why Microsoft have decided that my x64 compiler should find it unacceptable. Thanks for the patch. Cheers, Rob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 23:49:28
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626902 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaf...@gm... --- Comment #2 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-10-30 23:49:13 UTC --- Can you try this patch? If you have the tools, test results with MS's compiler and Cygwin would also be interesting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 23:48:09
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626902 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-10-30 23:47:58 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=173579) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=173579 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=626902&attachment=173579 Try to fix the 64bit converters for mingw32 If we're not being compiled with the Microsoft compiler, just use strtoll and strtoull everywhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 22:49:55
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628564 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-10-30 22:49:39 UTC --- Reading the gobject code confirms your conclusions. Committed. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 22:49:53
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628564 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #169306|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 22:42:34
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633413 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #173449|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 22:42:34
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633413 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-10-30 22:42:19 UTC --- Committed. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 22:38:42
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633517 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-10-30 22:38:28 UTC --- Looks good, committed. Thanks. If you're looking for more missing functionality in this area, I can offer <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570792> and <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570793>. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 22:38:42
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633517 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #173534|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 18:17:31
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633521 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #173541|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 18:17:23
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633521 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-10-30 18:17:12 UTC --- Looks good, committed. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 18:09:00
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628748 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution|INCOMPLETE |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-10-30 18:08:51 UTC --- Some experimentation suggests that the '=for apidoc' line needs to match the ALIAS line completely in order for Glib::GenPod to pick up the POD. I haven't investigated much further, but I just fixed this particular instance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 18:03:58
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633519 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #173539|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 18:03:52
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633519 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-10-30 18:03:41 UTC --- Cool, thanks! Committed with a minor tweak to the POD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 00:14:24
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633521 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: GenPod show style properties Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=173541) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=173541 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=633521&attachment=173541 patch "style properties" similar to the child properties in the generated pods. The ->can() should mean it quietly does nothing on object classes without style properties. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-30 00:10:08
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633519 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: find_style_property(), list_style_properties() Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=173539) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=173539 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=633519&attachment=173539 patch and test case Wrappers for find_style_property(), list_style_properties() cut and pasted from the GObject and GtkContainer code. (Should look into some sharing for these three find/list, but start with something that runs at least.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-10-29 23:57:48
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633517 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: ParamSpec "override" funcs Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=173534) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=173534 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=633517&attachment=173534 patch and test case Wrappers for the g_param_spec_override() and g_param_spec_get_redirect_target(). I think the override can be used just by adding it to your "properties" list, without g_object_class_override_property() as such. The g_param_spec_get_redirect_target() is in any case a getter so can be used on any pspec you might strike. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
13 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
