Menu

#147 StrucTiSM package: Add exogenous variables into univariate time series basic structural model forecast

None
closed
nobody
None
5
2024-11-23
2021-03-27
No

The STS BSM can be estimated incorporating exogenous variables, but they cannot be incorporated into the forecast function option (evidently it would only be relevant if projected values of these were to be user provided). This seems to be a significant limitation of the current BSM version.

Related

Feature Requests: #147

Discussion

  • Brian J Revell

    Brian J Revell - 2021-03-27

    The present BSM is limited in usefulness for projection purpises.

     
  • Sven Schreiber

    Sven Schreiber - 2021-03-27
    • summary: Add exogenous variables into univariate ime series basic structural model forecast --> StrucTiSM package: Add exogenous variables into univariate time series basic structural model forecast
    • Group: -->
     
  • Sven Schreiber

    Sven Schreiber - 2021-03-27

    Thanks for the reminder. Yes it would be useful. (Internal note: Perhaps it would make sense to leverage the ksimul apparatus for that.)

     
  • Sven Schreiber

    Sven Schreiber - 2021-10-09

    That feature is implemented in a not-yet-released version of the package. We are still trying to verify results with some known-good cross-check from some other software. Hopefully, that shouldn't take too long.

     
  • Sven Schreiber

    Sven Schreiber - 2021-11-09
    • status: open --> closed
     
    • Brian J Revell

      Brian J Revell - 2021-11-09

      Hi Sven
      Much appreciated
      Brian

      On Tue, 9 Nov 2021, 07:10 Sven S., svetosch@users.sourceforge.net wrote:

      • status: open --> closed
      • Comment:

      Version 0.7 of the package has been released with this feature, so I'm
      closing this.


      Status: closed
      Group:
      Created: Sat Mar 27, 2021 11:47 AM UTC by Brian J Revell
      Last Updated: Sat Oct 09, 2021 07:04 PM UTC
      Owner: nobody

      The STS BSM can be estimated incorporating exogenous variables, but they
      cannot be incorporated into the forecast function option (evidently it
      would only be relevant if projected values of these were to be user
      provided). This seems to be a significant limitation of the current BSM
      version.


      Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in
      https://sourceforge.net/p/gretl/feature-requests/147/

      To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit
      https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/

       

      Related

      Feature Requests: #147

  • Sven Schreiber

    Sven Schreiber - 2021-11-09

    Version 0.7 of the package has been released with this feature, so I'm closing this.

     
  • Brian J Revell

    Brian J Revell - 2024-02-06

    Is there a simple way to deselect specific Panel units in the Panel
    Regression Sample menu?
    For example I have a Panel of 12 units. Whilst I can delete say units 1-3
    by resetting the sample to 4-12, or say units 9-12 by setting the sample to
    units 1-8 I cannot for example remove units 6 and 8, as the sample
    selction menu does no lend itself to that option.
    It would be helpful to be able to have an option to itemise the specific
    panel units in the sample menuu,either to include eg 1,2,3,4,5,7,9,10,
    11,12, or to exclude 6 and 8..
    Suggestions welcomed

    Brian J Revell
    Harper Adams University UK

     
  • Sven Schreiber

    Sven Schreiber - 2024-02-06

    Brian, you're replying to a ticket that has been closed for over two years, and the topic is unrelated. If the problem persists after my reply, please re-post your question (or follow-ups) on the mailing list.
    Having said that, you would have to choose Sample/Restrict by condition, and then enter an expression like "unit != 6 && unit != 8" (without the quotes). If the series "unit" doesn't exist yet, create it with "Add/Panel group index" first (or similar wording).
    Whether that qualifies as a "simple way", I don't know.

     
  • Brian J Revell

    Brian J Revell - 2024-11-23

    Is there any reason why recursive forecasts cannot be included in the ARIMA
    option for univariate modelling together with confidence intervals when no
    exogenous varaibles are included in the specification Clearly post sample
    data the MA terms would drop out.

    Brian

    Brian J Revell
    Professor Emeritus (Agricultural Economics)
    Harper Adams University UK
    Current Chair of Defra Economic Advisory Panel
    Former President Agricultural Economics Society

    Tel: home 01952 728153 Mobile 07976 538712
    Address: Orchard Croft, Vineyard Rd, Homer, Much Wenlock TF!3 6NG
    Alt. Email bjrevell@harper-adams.ac.uk

     
    • Sven Schreiber

      Sven Schreiber - 2024-11-23

      Hi, again I don't think that you're actually talking about the topic in this (closed) ticket, which was about StrucTiSM. Please re-post your question on the gretl mailing list. (like you did with your other message today)

       
      • Brian J Revell

        Brian J Revell - 2024-11-23

        O k
        Though the issue was one of a feature request. I will selete the feature
        request address from my contacts.
        B

        On Sat, 23 Nov 2024, 16:26 Sven S., svetosch@users.sourceforge.net wrote:

        Hi, again I don't think that you're actually talking about the topic in
        this (closed) ticket, which was about StrucTiSM. Please re-post your
        question on the gretl mailing list. (like you did with your other message
        today)


        [feature-requests:#147]
        https://sourceforge.net/p/gretl/feature-requests/147/ StrucTiSM package:
        Add exogenous variables into univariate time series basic structural model
        forecast

        Status: closed
        Group:
        Created: Sat Mar 27, 2021 11:47 AM UTC by Brian J Revell
        Last Updated: Tue Feb 06, 2024 03:45 PM UTC
        Owner: nobody

        The STS BSM can be estimated incorporating exogenous variables, but they
        cannot be incorporated into the forecast function option (evidently it
        would only be relevant if projected values of these were to be user
        provided). This seems to be a significant limitation of the current BSM
        version.


        Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in
        https://sourceforge.net/p/gretl/feature-requests/147/

        To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit
        https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/

         

        Related

        Feature Requests: #147


Log in to post a comment.

MongoDB Logo MongoDB