From: Dianne R. <pra...@ya...> - 2012-02-25 12:29:51
|
I've spent the morning experimenting, and every gedcom I create is corrupt. I've saved directly to my desktop, cutting out Dropbox, and tried a couple of other viewers. Each viewer shows the same corrupt data. When I try in Gramps, it loads, shows the corrupt data, but crashes if I try to change view. Dianne |
From: Martin S. <mar...@ma...> - 2012-02-26 05:44:35
|
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:29:44PM +0000, Dianne Reuby wrote: >I've spent the morning experimenting, and every gedcom I create is >corrupt. I've saved directly to my desktop, cutting out Dropbox, and >tried a couple of other viewers. > >Each viewer shows the same corrupt data. When I try in Gramps, it loads, >shows the corrupt data, but crashes if I try to change view. Just to be clear, inside Gramps your father's not married to your husband's ancestor. However, when you export your family tree to gedcom he is. And if you import this gedcom into Gramps he is. Is that right? Does the gedcom look okay as text? In particular, as it relates to your father? Have you tried a minimal example? E.g. by creating a new family tree with a simple family, then exporting from Gramps to gedcom, etc. Do you have a testing copy of your Gramps db? You could make one by exporting to e.g. Gramps xml then importing into a new family tree. What happens if you make such a tree, but filter out all but your father and his descendants? Are there other connections between your husband's family and yours? What happens if you filter out your husband's line? Martin |
From: Alain A. <ala...@wa...> - 2012-02-26 12:15:45
|
I haven't compile since a few weeks. This morning I have compile without error. I have just noticed and error during the make install command. /make[5]: Rien à faire pour « install-exec-am ». *make[5]: *** Pas de règle pour fabriquer la cible « _PeoplePublic », nécessaire pour « install-pkgpythonPYTHON ». Arrêt.* *make[5]: quittant le répertoire « /home/alain/trunks/gramps-trunk/src/Filters/Rules » make[4]: *** [install-am] Erreur 2 make[4]: quittant le répertoire « /home/alain/trunks/gramps-trunk/src/Filters/Rules » make[3]: *** [install-recursive] Erreur 1 make[2]: *** [install-recursive] Erreur 1 make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Erreur 1 make: *** [install-recursive] Erreur 1* make[3]: quittant le répertoire « /home/alain/trunks/gramps-trunk/src/Filters/Rules » make[2]: quittant le répertoire « /home/alain/trunks/gramps-trunk/src/Filters » make[1]: quittant le répertoire « /home/alain/trunks/gramps-trunk/src » /When launching Gramps, I found this version/: Gramps 3.4.0-0.SVN18665 /And in pySVN workbench, I found that source folder is marked as 18969 Do I have the last trunk version installed ? A+ / / |
From: jerome <rom...@ya...> - 2012-02-26 13:08:01
|
> This morning I have compile without > error. > > I have just noticed and error during the make install > command. Not certain to understand, but there was some change on makefile process. And 3.4 branch has been created. Did you use something like: 'make clean' or re-run './autogen.sh' before using 'make'? > Do I have the last trunk version installed ? You can test a SVN snapshot for 3.4 branch in stead : http://gramps.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gramps/branches/maintenance/gramps34/?view=tar regards, Jérôme --- En date de : Dim 26.2.12, Alain Aupeix <ala...@wa...> a écrit : > De: Alain Aupeix <ala...@wa...> > Objet: [Gramps-users] Some errors when installing trunk > À: > Cc: "gramps-users" <gra...@li...> > Date: Dimanche 26 février 2012, 13h15 > I haven't compile since a few weeks. > This morning I have compile without > error. > > I have just noticed and error during the make install > command. > > /make[5]: Rien à faire pour « install-exec-am ». > *make[5]: *** Pas de règle pour fabriquer la cible « > _PeoplePublic », > nécessaire pour « install-pkgpythonPYTHON ». Arrêt.* > *make[5]: quittant le répertoire « > /home/alain/trunks/gramps-trunk/src/Filters/Rules » > make[4]: *** [install-am] Erreur 2 > make[4]: quittant le répertoire « > /home/alain/trunks/gramps-trunk/src/Filters/Rules » > make[3]: *** [install-recursive] Erreur 1 > make[2]: *** [install-recursive] Erreur 1 > make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Erreur 1 > make: *** [install-recursive] Erreur 1* > make[3]: quittant le répertoire « > /home/alain/trunks/gramps-trunk/src/Filters/Rules » > make[2]: quittant le répertoire « > /home/alain/trunks/gramps-trunk/src/Filters » > make[1]: quittant le répertoire « > /home/alain/trunks/gramps-trunk/src » > > /When launching Gramps, I found this version/: > > Gramps 3.4.0-0.SVN18665 > > /And in pySVN workbench, I found that source folder is > marked as 18969 > > Do I have the last trunk version installed ? > > A+ / > > / > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity > Planning > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud > computing > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a > service. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-users mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users > |
From: Alain A. <ala...@wa...> - 2012-02-26 15:38:52
|
Le 26/02/2012 14:07, jerome a écrit : >> This morning I have compile without >> error. >> >> I have just noticed and error during the make install >> command. > Not certain to understand, but there was some change on makefile process. > And 3.4 branch has been created. > > Did you use something like: > > 'make clean' Didn't did it, but now I make clean, and then launch my shell, and there is always the error. This is the same shell I ever used: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/bash cd ~/trunks/gramps-trunk ./autogen.sh |tee ../jgramps.log make | tee ../jgramps2.log sudo make install |tee ../jgramps3.log cd ~/.gramps/gramps34 rm -r *.* cd ~ cat trunks/jgramps2.log >> trunks/jgramps.log cat trunks/jgramps3.log >> trunks/jgramps.log rm trunks/jgramps2.log rm trunks/jgramps3.log gedit trunks/jgramps.log & ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > or re-run './autogen.sh' > > before using 'make'? As you can see, I do it each time. >> Do I have the last trunk version installed ? > You can test a SVN snapshot for 3.4 branch in stead : > http://gramps.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gramps/branches/maintenance/gramps34/?view=tar Here is the link I point with 'SVN Workbench' https://gramps.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gramps/trunk Isn't it enough, or wrong? I give again the error: *make[5]: *** Pas de règle pour fabriquer la cible « > _PeoplePublic », > nécessaire pour « install-pkgpythonPYTHON ». Arrêt.* > Perhaps isn't it important ? But the version that Gramps return is this: GRAMPS: 3.4.0-0.SVN18665 Python: 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Apr 16 2010, 13:57:41... BSDDB: 4.7.3 (4, 8, 24) LANG: fr_FR.utf8 OS: Linux Distribution: 2.6.32-38-generic © 2001-2006 Donald N. Allingham © 2007-2011 The Gramps Developers <<< curious A+ |
From: Dianne R. <pra...@ya...> - 2012-02-26 15:46:05
|
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 16:44 +1100, Martin Steer wrote: > Just to be clear, inside Gramps your father's not married to your > husband's ancestor. However, when you export your family tree to gedcom > he is. And if you import this gedcom into Gramps he is. Is that right? Yes > > Does the gedcom look okay as text? In particular, as it relates to your > father? I've been comparing it with various sample gedcoms I've found online, but I can't see any obvious differences. But I've never really looked at them before. > > Have you tried a minimal example? E.g. by creating a new family tree > with a simple family, then exporting from Gramps to gedcom, etc. I've had some strange results. I did my daughters ancestors, twice - both times it only includes her fathers line, not mine. I did my paternal great-grandfathers descendants, and it shows no spouses, and parent unknown if the parent is the one not from his birth line (but I imagine this is correct, as those people *aren't* his descendants, they married his descendants). I've tried creating a new tree with sample families, and don't seem to find any problems. But I haven't tried to create a very large tree - only one family, with a few people. > > Do you have a testing copy of your Gramps db? You could make one by > exporting to e.g. Gramps xml then importing into a new family tree. What > happens if you make such a tree, but filter out all but your father and > his descendants? > > Are there other connections between your husband's family and yours? > What happens if you filter out your husband's line? This seems to be a bit random - surnames disappear, although they show OK in gramps. Relationships change, and when I generate a gedcom they errors change. For example in run 1 Person A is incorrectly married to Person B. On a second run, Person A is incorrectly married to person C. But in gramps they show perfectly OK on the database, just incorrect if I load the gedcom. Dianne |
From: jerome <rom...@ya...> - 2012-02-26 16:12:58
|
Hi, At a glance (without seing your gedcoms), FamilyTreeMaker or Ancestry are generating a wrong/empty/exotic ID on family identifiants. Maybe Gramps knows this products did such of thing and Gramps tries to fix it? It is just my guess, because it is easy to corrupt a gedcom (planned or not!), see http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=2710 My though is that something is corrupted on FAMC level (some IDs) Sorry, but why not using CSV or ODS file formats ? Gedcom file format does not provide additionnal support and can be easily corrupted. Maybe you can also try third party tools using Gramps XML as 'data engine/model' ! See: http://members.tele2.nl/m.d.nauta/grampsExhibit/KootExhibit.xml under Android devices ... regards, Jérôme --- En date de : Dim 26.2.12, Dianne Reuby <pra...@ya...> a écrit : > De: Dianne Reuby <pra...@ya...> > Objet: Re: [Gramps-users] Corrupt gedcom (was GEDCOM viewer for Android) > À: gra...@li... > Date: Dimanche 26 février 2012, 16h45 > On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 16:44 +1100, > Martin Steer wrote: > > > Just to be clear, inside Gramps your father's not > married to your > > husband's ancestor. However, when you export your > family tree to gedcom > > he is. And if you import this gedcom into Gramps he is. > Is that right? > > Yes > > > > > Does the gedcom look okay as text? In particular, as it > relates to your > > father? > > I've been comparing it with various sample gedcoms I've > found online, > but I can't see any obvious differences. But I've never > really looked at > them before. > > > > > Have you tried a minimal example? E.g. by creating a > new family tree > > with a simple family, then exporting from Gramps to > gedcom, etc. > > I've had some strange results. I did my daughters ancestors, > twice - > both times it only includes her fathers line, not mine. > > I did my paternal great-grandfathers descendants, and it > shows no > spouses, and parent unknown if the parent is the one not > from his birth > line (but I imagine this is correct, as those people > *aren't* his > descendants, they married his descendants). > > I've tried creating a new tree with sample families, and > don't seem to > find any problems. But I haven't tried to create a very > large tree - > only one family, with a few people. > > > > Do you have a testing copy of your Gramps db? You could > make one by > > exporting to e.g. Gramps xml then importing into a new > family tree. What > > happens if you make such a tree, but filter out all but > your father and > > his descendants? > > > > Are there other connections between your husband's > family and yours? > > What happens if you filter out your husband's line? > > This seems to be a bit random - surnames disappear, although > they show > OK in gramps. Relationships change, and when I generate a > gedcom they > errors change. For example in run 1 Person A is incorrectly > married to > Person B. On a second run, Person A is incorrectly married > to person C. > But in gramps they show perfectly OK on the database, just > incorrect if > I load the gedcom. > > Dianne > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity > Planning > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud > computing > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a > service. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-users mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users > |
From: Martin S. <mar...@ma...> - 2012-02-27 01:11:21
|
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 03:45:48PM +0000, Dianne Reuby wrote: >On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 16:44 +1100, Martin Steer wrote: > >> Just to be clear, inside Gramps your father's not married to your >> husband's ancestor. However, when you export your family tree to gedcom >> he is. And if you import this gedcom into Gramps he is. Is that right? > >Yes > It does sound as though you have some screwed-up IDs in your database. As I understand it, Gramps doesn't use these internally, but does export them to gedcom. Under the Tools menu you will find Family Tree Processing > Reorder Gramps IDs. I suggest running this, then trying the export gedcom, import gedcom cycle again. The 'reorder' tool in fact rewrites the IDs, so if you have customized these and want to keep them, clone your db and try it there. Martin |
From: Benny M. <ben...@gm...> - 2012-02-27 08:38:55
|
if you imported data, running the tools: Family Tree repair --> rebuild reference maps Family Tree repair --> rebuild secondary indices might help in case there where problems with the imported data (like references to events which are not present in reality in the import, ...) Benny 2012/2/27 Martin Steer <mar...@ma...>: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 03:45:48PM +0000, Dianne Reuby wrote: >>On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 16:44 +1100, Martin Steer wrote: >> >>> Just to be clear, inside Gramps your father's not married to your >>> husband's ancestor. However, when you export your family tree to gedcom >>> he is. And if you import this gedcom into Gramps he is. Is that right? >> >>Yes >> > > It does sound as though you have some screwed-up IDs in your database. > As I understand it, Gramps doesn't use these internally, but does export > them to gedcom. Under the Tools menu you will find Family Tree > Processing > Reorder Gramps IDs. I suggest running this, then trying the > export gedcom, import gedcom cycle again. The 'reorder' tool in fact > rewrites the IDs, so if you have customized these and want to keep them, > clone your db and try it there. > > Martin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Try before you buy = See our experts in action! > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-users mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users |
From: Dianne R. <pra...@ya...> - 2012-02-29 14:37:46
|
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 09:38 +0100, Benny Malengier wrote: > if you imported data, running the tools: > > Family Tree repair --> rebuild reference maps > Family Tree repair --> rebuild secondary indices Tried that, but no joy. I may try exporting in other formats, to see if I get good results. Dianne |
From: Martin S. <mar...@ma...> - 2012-02-29 06:39:28
|
Hi Dianne, I'm interested to know if you solved your problem, and if so, how. Martin |
From: Dianne R. <pra...@ya...> - 2012-02-29 14:26:19
|
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:39 +1100, Martin Steer wrote: > Hi Dianne, > > I'm interested to know if you solved your problem, and if so, how. > I'm still looking at some of the suggestions - didn't have time yesterday, I plan to try out some of the repair features (after backups, of course!) and then if necessary try some of the more technical stuff, though I'll probably be back for more instructions before I do. Dianne |