From: Ralph F. De W. <ral...@ch...> - 2003-04-24 22:48:40
|
Hi all: I have just installed Gramps 0.9.1 and I like the improvements. In the past I have submitted my data to the LDS via the Temple Ready Program, at that time I used a windows program called Ancestral Quest. Since I have moved to Gramps and there is no easy way to do this, I have stopped the effort. I earlier versions of Gramps I have not seen this error but, since I changed versions to 0.9.1 I am noticing a lot of duplicate parents in the database with SLGC in the relationship block. Does anyone know what that stands for? My best current guess is that it is some code the Temple Ready program put in the Data Base. What I would like to do is remove these duplicates and move the code to the appropriate LDS tab. Does any one know what the code stands for? Thanks for your help. Ralph |
From: Don A. <dal...@us...> - 2003-04-24 23:03:50
|
Ralph, SLGC is a GEDCOM code for an LDS sealing. Did these occur after you imported a GEDCOM into GRAMPS? Don On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 16:47, Ralph F. De Witt wrote: > Hi all: > I have just installed Gramps 0.9.1 and I like the improvements. In the > past I have submitted my data to the LDS via the Temple Ready Program, > at that time I used a windows program called Ancestral Quest. Since > I have moved to Gramps and there is no easy way to do this, I have > stopped the effort. I earlier versions of Gramps I have not seen > this error but, since I changed versions to 0.9.1 I am noticing a lot > of duplicate parents in the database with SLGC in the relationship > block. Does anyone know what that stands for? My best current guess is > that it is some code the Temple Ready program put in the Data Base. What > I would like to do is remove these duplicates and move the code to the > appropriate LDS tab. > > Does any one know what the code stands for? Thanks for your help. > > Ralph -- Don Allingham <dal...@us...> GRAMPS - Open Source Genealogy |
From: Ralph F. De W. <ral...@ch...> - 2003-04-25 04:43:30
|
On 24 Apr 2003 17:03:43 -0600 Don Allingham <dal...@us...> wrote: > SLGC is a GEDCOM code for an LDS sealing. Did these occur after you > imported a GEDCOM into GRAMPS? > > Don Don: These were done before the GEDCOM was imported into GRAMPS, possible around 1999. I have not submitted anything to the LDS since changeing to GRAMPS, as there is no easy way to get data submitted to Temple Ready into GRAMPS, and I do not have a windows system any more. Could you email the GEDCOM code meaning for these LDS codes so I know where to move that detail when I clean up these duplicates. Thanks for your quick reply. Ralph |
From: Ralph F. De W. <ral...@ch...> - 2003-04-25 05:22:34
|
On 24 Apr 2003 17:03:43 -0600 Don Allingham <dal...@us...> wrote: > SLGC is a GEDCOM code for an LDS sealing. Did these occur after you > imported a GEDCOM into GRAMPS? Don: I found the codes on line, so I do not need a copy now. Now my question is Since no dates and temple names seem to be associated with the event, Can I assume that the event code only indicates a submittal to the Temple Ready program, and not the completion of the ordinance which should have a Temple Code and Date component? Ralph |
From: Ralph F. De W. <ral...@ch...> - 2003-04-25 07:57:51
|
On 24 Apr 2003 17:03:43 -0600 Don Allingham <dal...@us...> wrote: > SLGC is a GEDCOM code for an LDS sealing. Did these occur after you > imported a GEDCOM into GRAMPS? Don: I have looked more closely at this problem, and I believe that it may be an error in the code. In my wife's case she is dead, as well as her father. Her mother is still living. In her case both her parents are listed twice the second time with SLGC in the Relationship window. In another case my uncle is dead, as well as his parents. His parents are listed twice with the same SLGC in the Relationship window. In the case of my wife, I am fairly sure the Temple Ready program would not have flagged her to be sealed to her parents as one is still living. In the case of my uncle I am not sure as two children (uncles) are still living. Hope this quick look helps some. Ralph |