|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2005-07-05 19:52:37
|
Ethan Merritt wrote: > On Tuesday 05 July 2005 11:56 am, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > >>I just noticed the key is programmed so that settings are adjusted immediately upon interpretation. Thus if there is a syntax error in a line, settings up to that error will be changed. >> >>Isn't it preferable that nothing be changed until the whole line is verified as valid? > > > Not really. Why would it be? > I think I'd rather get as much of my command as possible, even if the last option has a typo. I don't know, there's just something random about a portion of a line being processed. If there is an error, I'm not likely going to think "Alright, now which properties changed? And which do I have left to change?" Rather, I think most people have a habit of hitting the up arrow to recall the last line and fix it (or just fix the line in a script file) then rerun the command. I'll leave it as is. The other side of the coin is someone types in a command with "exploratory syntax" to see if something works, an error results, the user decides it is fine as is, yet some parameter has changed. Dan |