From: Harald H. <h.h...@tu...> - 2004-08-14 17:12:56
|
> You are right, and I was unduly accepting of the first line of the > output file, which has been > %!PS-Adobe-2.0 > since at least gnuplot version 3.7 This is not the Postscript level but the Version number of the DSC comment structure. Version 3.0 of the "PostScript Language Document Structuring Conventions Specification" is dated 25 September 1992, long before Postscript Level 3 has been started. The Postscript header does not specify which Postscript level is used. > In a quick check of the source for Level 2 extensions listed in the > PostScript reference manual I don't see any obvious ones. I am not > sure about whether our code assumes Level 2 behaviour with > regard to font encodings. I will have a look to the Postscript Language Reference to find out if we really are free of level2 code. > However, Daniel's upcoming binary + image patch depends on the > Level2 operator "filter", so we will have to keep an eye on that. We should speak to him to ensure that also the filter operator is not used when using level1. --=20 Harald Harders Langer Kamp 8 Technische Universit=E4t Braunschweig D-38106 Braunschweig Institut f=FCr Werkstoffe Germany E-Mail: h.h...@tu... Tel: +49 (5 31) 3 91-3062 WWW : http://www.harald-harders.de Fax: +49 (5 31) 3 91-3058 |