Re: proposal for cvs'ing "with image"

[Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...>]

Ethan Merritt wrote:

>On Thursday 12 August 2004 12:00 am, mi...@ph... wrote:
>  
>
>>I propose the patch gets committed into cvs.
>>    
>>
>
>Question:
>
>The patch contains a new file gplt_x11.h
>Why is it marked
>
> Copyright 2000   Thomas Williams, Colin Kelley
>
>This seems very unlikely to be correct.
>

I did a block copy from some other header file when that was created and 
didn't think about it again.  Hans or someone probably updated all 
Copyright notices in all other files before the 4.0 release.  That would 
be my guess.

That new header is meant to make common some of the codes and parameters 
used on both sides of the gnuplot_x11 pipe.  (A start anyway.)

What should the notice be?  In fact, what should the notice be for this 
new "binary datafile.c" file?

Dan