From: Hans-Bernhard B. <br...@ph...> - 2004-07-23 23:04:12
|
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > If you recall, there was a discussion of precisely controlling the size > of a plot. It concerned how labels would take away space from the plot > so that the eventual size of the borders was random, or at least not > known to the user. The solution was to set the margins to 0, for which > the values specified in "size" matched the borders of the plot. Not quite. You just have to set the margins to value other than the default, so gnuplot doesn't auto-size them. It doesn't strictly have to be zero. > But there is a similar situation with the key. When the key is > specified as "below", that uses up space, so again "set size X,Y" is no > longer the precise size of the borders. It is, if you set bmargin to a value large enough to let the key fit below the graph. That said, I like the suggestion. But for now, we're not quite done with the "with pixels" stuff yet, are we? I think that should take priority now. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (br...@ph...) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain. |