From: Petr M. <mi...@ph...> - 2004-07-16 17:26:09
|
> > I will prefer sprintf(). That's compatible to all our famous programming > > languages and does not require user to search / think "what kind of command > > has gnuplot for sprintf?". > > But then, we have to rename `print', too. Or, at least introduce a new > command `printf' which uses the same syntax as sprintf and prints to the > shell (as `print' does with a different syntax). I don't see a problem. sprintf() is a function which creates a string, while print is a command to print something on screen. --- PM |