From: Hans-Bernhard B. <br...@ph...> - 2004-07-10 01:21:49
|
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Daniel J Sebald wrote: [...] > What do you think? Certainly, duplicating this code is a no-no. The > core translation could be defined as a macro and included in two > separate functions, one where xt and yt are doubles, one where xt and yt > are unsigned ints... As a matter of fact, map3d_xy() is a bit of a mess already as it is. It does two unrelated jobs rolled into one function call. This will need some cleanup eventually. But maybe not right now... > or as I've argued in the discussion initiated by Ethan, just plain ints. No. Using 'int' for this is a placebo. It may appear to cure the worst of the symptoms, but that's more by coincidence and belief in the cure than by design. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (br...@ph...) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain. |