From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2004-07-05 20:50:45
|
Ethan Merritt wrote: >Is everyone OK with the idea "if a label is out of bounds don't >try to draw it at all"? > Not totally. It would be nice that if a partial text string were supposed to show it would. I would say that if you pin this down as the actual problem and it seems that there is no easy solution, then OK. If it seems like it is the PDF utilities fault, then it should be fixed there by someone else. > This would be change, as right now some >drivers will draw the piece of the label that is in-bounds even though >the label coordinates themselves are out of bounds. > This would be preferred, I think. A few things about the datastrings.dem, because I'm not sure my observations agree with the problem you are describing. First, the demo looks nice. I notice that the 3D case for X11 clips off the bottom three labels. I notice that the PostScript output file shows the bottom three. I notice that inside the 'test.ps' file the bottom three labels (the ones that X11 truncates) have negative y positions associated with them. (So, is PostScript expanding the screen to include everything?) I notice that ps2pdf on 'test.ps' produces a 'test.pdf' that works fine in Acroread. (Does that imply that translating negative numbers for PDF may not really pose a problem?) I notice in both X11 and PostScript that the labels at the very bottom and very top do not have red lines drawn to them. Is gnuplot treating the "extent" of the plot to the portion inside the labels, and anything beyond that is clipped? I would say that the clipping should be part of the visible plot *or* the "plotting region" plot, but not a combination of both as is the case with the labels being visible at the outer regions but not the red lines. Dan |