From: <pl...@pi...> - 2007-08-08 12:24:15
|
------- Forwarded message ------- To: "Hans-Bernhard Bröker" <HBB...@t-...> Subject: Re: Gnuplot time is 5 hours ahead of the rest of the world Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:15:23 +0200 On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:04:43 +0200, Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBB...@t-...> wrote: > pl...@pi... wrote: >> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:52:33 +0200, Hans-Bernhard Bröker >> <HBB...@t-...> wrote: > >>> That's the mean number of seconds of the actual astronomical year. But >>> we're dealing with calendars here, not with astronomy. The average >>> length of a calender year, in the period under consideration (1970 to >>> roughly 2038), is 365.25 days. Multiply that by DAY_SEC and you get >>> exactly those 31557600 seconds found in our YEAR_SEC. > >> That's the average over a period with exactly 3 non leap years and one >> leap year. This will not be the average of any arbitary period within >> the range you indicate. > > It is, in the only sense that such an average can be defined: it's the > expectation value of the corresponding random variable. The actual > possible values are 365 or 366, but on average, the length is 365.25. > WTF? We dont need an "expectation value" we need the number of seconds. This is not a "random variable". There is a precise length of time which elapsed according to a definitively defined calendar system. That is precisely why I pointed out that use of a mean value is _incorrect_. Calculate the length of that actual years in question , it is known and defined. We dont need to start apply statistics , thermodynamics or quantum theory. Just count the days! |