From: <pl...@pi...> - 2007-07-01 20:26:50
|
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 20:56:11 +0200, Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBB...@t-...> wrote: > pl...@pi... wrote: > >> I think it would be very useful to add lanczos filter as an >> interpolation >> method. > > So file it as a feature request. Well I thought it best to sound the idea out here before taking the time to make feature request. Should I take that sort of reply mean you think it may be a useful idea? > But make sure you describe the > background a bit more accurately: So what is inaccurate? > >> The existing splines are fine but have a strong tendancy to extend >> well outside the path of the existing data when the data has a lot of >> fluctuations, a common situation. > > That's actually only true for csplines and acsplines, but not for any of > the other filters. That's why I said ***existing splines*** and not "any of the other filters." > >> Although the implementation is correct this can be very misleading >> when viewing data presented with this sort of "smoothing". > > And how is that news? *All* viewing of smoothed data is misleading, > because it pretends you have smoother data than you actually do. The > only question is how the plot misleads the viewer, not if. What is "news" is that one would expect a smoothing function to reduce the excursions from the local mean , not exagerate them. If smoother means reduced second differential it's smoother, but badly distorted. I'm not sure what real use this sort of smoothing is , it always makes my data look worse than the original and gives it a totally misleading form. Probably mainly useful for doing pseudo-science with misleading results. How about dropping the smart, sarcastic tone in *All* your posts? It gets rather tiring. |