From: <HBB...@t-...> - 2007-06-14 20:00:51
|
Erik Schaff. wrote: > may be a bug? No. You just don't understand about sampling and finite resolution. You're plotting a function that only exists in for -1 < x < 1, but over a range from -10 to 10. Which means that you're wasting 90 percent of sampling points on nonexistent values. The remaining 10 points at which the function actually returns a usable value come nowhere close enough to +/- 1.0 to generate the huge y amplitude you expect. > I've just added the .ps output that I got with the expression atanh(x). Why does > the plot stop at once ( around 2 on the y-axe), artanh has to be printed until + > / - infinity as it reaches + - 1 on x-axe. And how do you suppose infinity would fit onto a finite range of display? I suggest you run an experiment: find the biggest number that's smaller than 1.0, and compute atanh() of that. Explain why the result is so much smaller than infinity. |