|
From: sfgphm <sf...@gm...> - 2025-12-12 21:14:42
|
Dear Ethan, I can confirm that all four issues in the test script have been resolved with commit [4d3398fdd] to branch-6.0-stable. Thank you very much for taking the time to backport this non-trivial fix. Best regards, H. Motoyoshi On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 8:17 AM Ethan A Merritt <me...@uw...> wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 December 2025 15:20:28 PST sfhm wrote: > > Dear Ethan, > > > > I would like to request a backport to the 6.0.4 release. > > > > I have observed differences in polygon color rendering between the > > development version and previous release versions (including > > 6.0.4-testing). The development version renders polygons with the > intended > > colors, while the release versions render them with different colors. > > [snip example] > > > If the fix for this issue in the development version is sufficiently > > stable, I would greatly appreciate its backport to the 6.0.4 release, > even > > if only for some of the cases rather than all of them. > > Unfortunately, that is not a trivial change. > > The code that deals with how fill color and border color are specified, > stored, and eventually applied to graphical elements in the plot has > diverged between 6.0 and the development branch. > > A partial list of relevant commits in 6.1 that do not apply cleanly to 6.0 > c92721 fc9818 > > Nevertheless, it is possible that the specific cases of "splot with > polygons" > in your test script could be handled either by some subset of the changes > currently in the development branch or by some ad hoc fixes for 6.0. > The trick is not to break anything else. > > I will look into it, but no promises about 6.0.4. > > Ethan > > > |