| 
      
      
      From: Yury <yur...@gm...> - 2024-05-19 13:59:10
      
     | 
| On 19/05/2024 10:03, Ethan Merritt wrote: > First some background. My thanks and my apologies. I sincerely appreciate that exposition, but I should've been more specific, too, it seems. I knew about multiplication factors and when testing, I've set all of those to 1.0, and I've expressed all sizes (as appropriate) in metric units. E.g. line width 50mm as 72.0/25.4*50. Then I've output the resulting PS and/or PDF to screen and measured things with a ruler. Also checked in the resulting PS and uncompressed PDF to see sizes of things as expressed in points, however much of that I could understand. > If you are unhappy with the default settings, you can change them when > you select the terminal. Thing is, all scalable terminals seem to do their own thing with sizes. With `postscript+eps` we at least know something *determinate* in advance. With other ones, nope. Posting this, I'm sort of hoping developers would give the matter a look, if possible. Undocumented behaviour > You can set the tic format to whatever you want. > The default format for latex terminal output is "$%h$", Somehow I've imagined that format to be hardcoded in tex terminals. Nice. > Does that help? Thank you. Also, see the 1st paragraph of this reply. Thank you, regardless. -Yury |