From: Hans-Bernhard B. <br...@ph...> - 2004-06-02 11:34:39
|
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > Would this be a tolerable hack? Define a special type in some header > for char's as function arguments > > /* Throwback to K&R */ > #ifdef __STDC__ > #define ACHAR char > #else > #define ACHAR int > #endif Ethan already suggested pretty much the same idea, and I rejected it as terminally ugly, and not particularly useful. If the K&R variant (making the parameter 'int') works at all, it'll work for ANSI C, too. > Anyway, is gnuplot.texi a generated file? (I see something called > doc2texi.el) If so, should it be in the cvsignore list so that it isn't > checked out when getting the latest CVS version? gnuplot.texi is a bit tricky to regenerate. Up until rather recently, I never managed to do it myself, because I usually do all builds outside the source tree, which breaks the generation of gnuplot.texi. Therefore, even though I'm not quite happy with the situation, I agree with Lars on this one: it'll have to remain inside CVS for now. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (br...@ph...) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain. |