Re: Finally: 4.0 tagged, tarred and ready to test.

[Hans-Bernhard B. <br...@ph...>]

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Ethan Merritt wrote:

> On Wednesday 14 April 2004 05:55 am, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Ethan Merritt wrote:
> > > Building on Tru64 using DEC cc generates a large number of
> > > compiler warnings due to the re-definition of TBOOLEAN.
> >
> > Not of TBOOLEAN itself, I trust it, but of the system datatype __Bool or
> > similar.  What were the results of configure tests on __Bool and
> > <stdbool.h>?
[...]
> ac_cv_header_stdbool_h=no
> ac_cv_type__Bool=no

In that case, I don't quite see why it would fail this way.

I've lost access to the Digital Unix boxes round here, so it's a bit tough
to guess what might be going on here.  This would be an incompatibility
between DEC cc and GNU autoconf's suggestion how to handle booleans.

Can you have a look at preprocessor output to see what the affected
prototypes and declarations actually come out as?

-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (br...@ph...)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.