Re: misc for readmes

[Petr M. <mi...@ph...>]

> > My old complaint:
> > I always find the "Note 3" completely useless and vote for removing it.
>
> That would be very unfriendly to the author of gnuplot-mode.  We can't
> just swallow a copy of his package into ours without explaining why that
> copy is incomplete.
>
> > (I don't consider myself to be an ordinary user of gnuplot but never met
> > gnuplot-mode; and I wonder how gnuplot 4.0 is affected by some files
> > not being present from this mode...)
>
> Frankly, whether or not anyone of *us* is using that package is completely
> irrelevant.  gnuplot-mode is a user-interface to gnuplot that people are

Ok then but ordinary people have no idea what that front-end is for, and
just got confused immediately in README.1st. Could you please add 1 sentence
or a better title like "gnuplot-mode for emacs (??)  for (arbitrary??) OS".

Then, about those file which are missing (compared to what? link to the web
site of this mode as the "Front-ends" section on gnuplot's web page?), could
rather be written in its own directory then in README.1st which will be read
by more people then lisp/README.


---
PM