Re: possible missing entry in configure.in

[Lars H. <lhe...@us...>]

James R. Van Zandt writes:
> 
> I'd like to see the following change in autoconfiguration.  It fixed a
> build problem I was having.  I don't remember the details now, but
> they involved my having two versions of automake installed, and
> without this change both versions were run for different parts of the
> build resulting in incompatible files.
> 
> I'd be glad to check this in, but don't want to break something this
> close to release.
 
 Please describe the problem in detail. The change is neither required,
 nor does it make sense, because lisp/Makefile is generated by
 lisp/configure.