From: Hans-Bernhard B. <br...@ph...> - 2004-04-06 22:44:18
|
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Ethan Merritt wrote: > On Tuesday 06 April 2004 10:24 am, you wrote: > > So it seems we could withdraw to a position stated in INSTALL that says: > > > > gnuplot+Windows+(current GD built as DLL)+(no libfreetype) == NO GO > > But even if freetype is present, we would still need conditional code in > gd.trm so that it doesn't generate unresolved symbol errors at build time, > right? Right. Oversight on my end. > Is it easy to build libgd as static under windows? I say we leave that to Petr, since he's going to be doing the Windows builds, and he said he's been using static libs all the time and it works. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (br...@ph...) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain. |