From: Petr M. <mi...@ph...> - 2004-04-05 19:03:00
|
> *) HB or Lars make a source tarball. > > Circulate that in private (Lars' ftp server? Or the project home > directory at sf.net?) to check for last-minute glitches. Where do the released files go? - sourceforge - darthmouth?? - CTAN > *) Distribute work on binary packages for PCs. > > One important note: I don't think we can provide binaries with > the pdf driver compiled in. It's "non-commercial use only". If someone proofs this, then binaries will be without this feature. > I would volunteer building the 32-bit DOS version (DJGPP). > Cygwin by Petr (both Unix gnuplot/X11 and Win32 wgnuplot/pgnuplot, > in a single or two separate packages)? I can organize the following: 1. OS/2 binary. 2. Mingw binary -- probably with two executables: one normal, the other with PIPES defined for more unixish users 3. Cygwin+X11 by ./configure; make > 'docs tarball' by Lars? A prerelease of 1. and 2. is at www.sci.muni.cz/~mikulik/gnuplot/ I think FAQ should be replaced by FAQ.html Any other thing proposed to be there? > All ready by, let's say, Friday this week? Yes, till Friday. Other comments: *) File README.1st: This text is to be deleted? Note 3 ------ some files from Bruce Ravel's gnuplot-mode distribution have not been included here, namely o INSTALL (covered by gnuplot install instructions) o Win9x/INSTALL.Win9x o Win9x/pgnuplot.c (already in src/win) o gnuplot.info (can be created from docs/gnuplot.texi) o gpelcard.ps (can be created from lisp/gpelcard.tex) o install-sh, mkinstalldirs (provided by gnuplot) *) README (several of them) vs README.html: I remember someone has contributed html-ized version of README, where is its end nowadays? *) INSTALL (several of them): Should be unified too. *) FAQ vs FAQ.html: I would prefer to enclose FAQ.html instead of the plain text FAQ. I will please majority of users I guess. Anyway, should the FAQ file be in gnuplot sources anyway? Maybe it could be removed from there. *) BUGS: A note about Atari, Lars can remove that? --- PM |