From: Ethan M. <merritt@u.washington.edu> - 2004-02-19 16:57:13
|
On Thursday 19 February 2004 07:01 am, Petr Mikulik wrote: > > > > 3.8k ASAP, and a release of 4.0 on, say, Easter (mid-April). > > > > > > No objections. Altough I think code freezes have never worked > > > around here ... > > > > 6) release the 4.0 version in April > > Why should we wait till April? Do you think that anybody will take care > about looking to the frozen code of gnuplot for months? I only said April because I was responding to a proposal that mentioned April. I agree with you that sooner is better. > > As I've noticed, there were no (serious) bug reports for some months. > > I've noticed people (including some developers!) get very frustrated > that gnuplot gets releases in timescale of several years. That really > makes people disappointed. Let's don't do that. > > > The 1000th changelog entry for the trunk! If that's not something to > > be celebrated by a release, what could be? > > I propose to release 4.0 on February 27. > Or even better on Sunday February 29, which better follows gnuplot's > release timescales :-)) > > > With this strict deadline, people (at least on this list) will be > strongly motivated to make fastly all tests. I fear that for April, > nobody will have enough motivation. > > And release gnuplot-3.8k today. > > --- > Petr Mikulik > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > gnuplot-beta mailing list > gnu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta -- Ethan A Merritt merritt@u.washington.edu Biomolecular Structure Center (206)543-1421 Mailstop 357742 University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 |