Re: Test report for "make gnuplot-ja.pdf" on cygwin64

[Ethan A M. <me...@uw...>]

On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 13:26:09 PST Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote:
> 
> The correct solution would be to call doc2tex like it's done in the rule 
> for gnuplot.pdf:
> 
> 	./doc2tex

OK.
 
> The new production rule for gnuplot-ja.pdf has a few other problems 
> beside that:
> 
> * It doesn't work for out-of-source-tree builds, because of missing 
> $(srcdir)/ prefixes and a lack of TEXINPUTS addition of $(srcdir)

My understanding is that TEXINPUTS is disrecommended for luatex.
Has that changed?

	Ethan


> * It doesn't list prerequisite doc2tex$(EXEEXT), so
> 
> 	make clean
> 	make gnuplot-ja.pdf
> 
>    will fail.
> 
> Generally this rule should be re-done to be much closer to that for 
> gnuplot.pdf.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnuplot-beta mailing list
> gnu...@li...
> Membership management via: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta
>