From: Dave D. <dde...@es...> - 2004-08-05 16:52:08
|
Reginald Beardsley <rb...@su...> writes: > In my view, this violates the principle of "least surprise". It > took me over an hour to figure out why things didn't plot where > I expected. > > plot [x=0:10] x/3+13/3,x/3+13.0/3.0 > > I'm quite familiar w/ the rules for integer math, I just had no > reason to expect integer math rules in this context. > This crops up so often... I wonder if it is worth putting in special code to detect division of two integer constants, and warn once per session. (every evaluation would obviously be too often) Just a quick scan over the action table after parsing, to detect the sequence (puchc int), (pushc int), div gnuplot> show at x/3.0 + 10/3 push x pushc 3.0 div pushc 10 pushc 3 div plus Or even - when appending the 'div' action, peek back at the previous two entries. This isn't going to catch the sequence x=13 print x/3 but it might stop the user scratching their head for too long if they then resort to typing in things like print 13/3 dd -- Dave Denholm <dde...@es...> http://www.esmertec.com |